Comments on: AT&T Not Rushing Next Generation 4G Network? 3G Will Not Go Quietly...

By: tom

tom — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:54:48 +0000

To Ronald's post If only 2G is available in your area (home, work, school), you do not buy 3G device. Thats simple.

By: Ronald M Davis

Ronald M Davis — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:59:16 +0000

I bought an IPhone 3GS and AT&T charges me for 3G service and only supplies 2G in our area. That is not fair. The big corporation takes advantage of the little guy. If they can only supplly 2G, then they ought to have a reduced price.

By: N C

N C — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:25:07 +0000

I have the first gen iphone And it works faster than 3G alot of the time, AT&T should just get rid of all there 3g coverage and come out with 4g cause there 3G sucks

By: Sean Peters

Sean Peters — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:18:29 +0000

Yo, AT&T... how 'bout getting 3G extended to more than the dozen or so largest urban areas in the US before we worry about 4G, okay? I've got this lovely 3G hardware and no way to use it.

By: Jeremy Sikora

Jeremy Sikora — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:52:32 +0000

The same source sited that WiMax was a joke... so we shall see how that pans out. But I agree as well, might as well make it the best network before advancing to a technology that is just not there yet. It's good they are taking their time.

By: mrHiDefinition

mrHiDefinition — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:39:40 +0000

I definitely agree with what AT&T is doing this time. They are milking HSPA as much as they possible can. I feel they should stick to the game plan and just increase the bandwidth of their current HSDPA/HSUPA standards and compete with WiMax which only Sprint offers in the U.S.

By: iPhoneMilk

iPhoneMilk — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:51:43 +0000

LOL.... i like that his name is "Kafka"....

Final Fantasy anyone??