<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3GS #1 in Consumer Reports New Smartphone Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Corchado</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-136427</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Corchado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-136427</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey good post! I enjoyed that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey good post! I enjoyed that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsjr2006</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60815</link>
		<dc:creator>dsjr2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Haha. The Pre can&#039;t even do half the things the iPhone can do so it surely didn&#039;t fill in any gaps. Sprint is worse than At&amp;t and I would have to say the Pre is actually more locked down since they have the ability to force software updates on you to remove things if they want. Not to mention you can&#039;t do anything 3rd party with the Pre right now without getting into complex command-line. LMAO, get your facts straight.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha. The Pre can&#8217;t even do half the things the iPhone can do so it surely didn&#8217;t fill in any gaps. Sprint is worse than At&amp;t and I would have to say the Pre is actually more locked down since they have the ability to force software updates on you to remove things if they want. Not to mention you can&#8217;t do anything 3rd party with the Pre right now without getting into complex command-line. LMAO, get your facts straight.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will54880</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60670</link>
		<dc:creator>will54880</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60670</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At risk of getting ripped apart, I do believe the Pre is a better device than the iPhone.  As one website stated, OSX left alot out of it, and WebOS filled in the gaps.
Plus, WebOS is not locked down like OSX is by Apple.  And, you don&#039;t have to put up with at&amp;t.
I have used both devices, in case you are wondering.  Pre &gt; iPhone IMO.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At risk of getting ripped apart, I do believe the Pre is a better device than the iPhone.  As one website stated, OSX left alot out of it, and WebOS filled in the gaps.
Plus, WebOS is not locked down like OSX is by Apple.  And, you don&#8217;t have to put up with at&amp;t.
I have used both devices, in case you are wondering.  Pre &gt; iPhone IMO.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60628</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60628</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Funny how they are mostly touch screen devices near the top. I guess that&#039;s the wave of the future.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how they are mostly touch screen devices near the top. I guess that&#8217;s the wave of the future.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waidt</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60595</link>
		<dc:creator>Waidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 06:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60595</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Waidt
Maybe you should try reading the original post more closely before sounding off.  I think Jeremy clearly said the list was of the &quot;top 8 devices&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, what was it you were saying about incompetency and 16 yr old inattentiveness?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Waidt
Maybe you should try reading the original post more closely before sounding off.  I think Jeremy clearly said the list was of the &#8220;top 8 devices&#8221;. </p>

<p>Now, what was it you were saying about incompetency and 16 yr old inattentiveness?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poop Smells Good</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60551</link>
		<dc:creator>Poop Smells Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60551</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Truth:
I totally agree.....your name says it all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@ice:
You hit the nail on the head.  CR isn&#039;t even good for toilet paper.  The pages are too glossy. :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Truth:
I totally agree&#8230;..your name says it all.</p>

<p>@ice:
You hit the nail on the head.  CR isn&#8217;t even good for toilet paper.  The pages are too glossy. <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60515</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60515</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Consumer Reports reviews are just as crappy as the CNET ones except with CR you have to pay to look at the reviews.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consumer Reports reviews are just as crappy as the CNET ones except with CR you have to pay to look at the reviews.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waidt</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60502</link>
		<dc:creator>Waidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, ok:  &#039;TiPb&#039; and &#039;off&#039; were what i meant. Sorry if I offended.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, why was the volume so low on your otherwise very nice Wed night podcast?  And why can I not listen live on my iPhone?   It just seems funny that a livecast stream about the iPhone can&#039;t be listened to on the device itself. Or am I missing something here?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, ok:  &#8216;TiPb&#8217; and &#8216;off&#8217; were what i meant. Sorry if I offended.</p>

<p>BTW, why was the volume so low on your otherwise very nice Wed night podcast?  And why can I not listen live on my iPhone?   It just seems funny that a livecast stream about the iPhone can&#8217;t be listened to on the device itself. Or am I missing something here?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waidt</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60497</link>
		<dc:creator>Waidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Come on, Tipb, what are you - a bunch of kids?  So you chopped the list of at the Pre without explaining this, then you act surprised when people assume it came in last. I&#039;ve been seeing this kind of incompetence a bit on your site. Try to be more attentive than a 16 yr old.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And Consumer Reports?  What do they really know about anything?  My 3GS is far superior to my 3G. I appreciate it&#039;s responsiveness and crashlessness (aka stability) more and more with each passing day. OS 3.1 just makes it even sweeter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Tipb, what are you &#8211; a bunch of kids?  So you chopped the list of at the Pre without explaining this, then you act surprised when people assume it came in last. I&#8217;ve been seeing this kind of incompetence a bit on your site. Try to be more attentive than a 16 yr old.</p>

<p>And Consumer Reports?  What do they really know about anything?  My 3GS is far superior to my 3G. I appreciate it&#8217;s responsiveness and crashlessness (aka stability) more and more with each passing day. OS 3.1 just makes it even sweeter.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icebike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60489</link>
		<dc:creator>icebike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60489</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Smells Good:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn’t top tier.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve always thought that CS was good at rating canned peas.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anything technical, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Smells Good:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn’t top tier.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that CS was good at rating canned peas.</p>

<p>Anything technical, not so much.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VDR</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60475</link>
		<dc:creator>VDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60475</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Jeremy, thanks for the tip, that explains why there are only 8 phones on the above list.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremy, thanks for the tip, that explains why there are only 8 phones on the above list.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sikora</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sikora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60456</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@VDR, the 8900 is on the complete list but to view it you have to go to Consumer Reports web site. As stated in the post we only listed the top 8 devices. And I&#039;d take a Bold over the 8900 simply for 3G.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@VDR, the 8900 is on the complete list but to view it you have to go to Consumer Reports web site. As stated in the post we only listed the top 8 devices. And I&#8217;d take a Bold over the 8900 simply for 3G.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VDR</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60454</link>
		<dc:creator>VDR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60454</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this report is BS, since Blackberry Curve 8900 isn&#039;t even in the list and there&#039;s no way the Bold ranks higher than the Curve 8900.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this report is BS, since Blackberry Curve 8900 isn&#8217;t even in the list and there&#8217;s no way the Bold ranks higher than the Curve 8900.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cardfan</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60438</link>
		<dc:creator>cardfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60438</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had posted them over at precentral but took em down.  Never know if CR will have a fit.  As a fan of both phones, i can only say they didn&#039;t seem very consistent at all.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Example:  Messaging on the Pre integrates IM and should easily earn a top mark.  It didn&#039;t.  While the iphone is held up because AT&amp;T hasn&#039;t implemented MMS.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Example 2:  &quot;Voicing&quot; received higher on the iphone 3GS vs the iphone 3G.  Huh?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Only the display on the iphones grabbed top score.  The Pre is pretty sharp IMO.  Navigation isn&#039;t in this category if you&#039;re worried about it being as smooth as iphone.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d still put the iphone 3GS on top (easily) if i were doing a similar rankings, but CR clearly needs to stick to rating appliances :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had posted them over at precentral but took em down.  Never know if CR will have a fit.  As a fan of both phones, i can only say they didn&#8217;t seem very consistent at all.  </p>

<p>Example:  Messaging on the Pre integrates IM and should easily earn a top mark.  It didn&#8217;t.  While the iphone is held up because AT&amp;T hasn&#8217;t implemented MMS.  </p>

<p>Example 2:  &#8220;Voicing&#8221; received higher on the iphone 3GS vs the iphone 3G.  Huh?  </p>

<ol>
<li>Only the display on the iphones grabbed top score.  The Pre is pretty sharp IMO.  Navigation isn&#8217;t in this category if you&#8217;re worried about it being as smooth as iphone.</li>
</ol>

<p>I&#8217;d still put the iphone 3GS on top (easily) if i were doing a similar rankings, but CR clearly needs to stick to rating appliances <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Sikora</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Sikora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just so everyone knows, I simply stopped at the Palm Pre. So please don&#039;t think it was dead last. I will update to mention there were more than 8 devices on the list. ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so everyone knows, I simply stopped at the Palm Pre. So please don&#8217;t think it was dead last. I will update to mention there were more than 8 devices on the list. <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ericg1840</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60430</link>
		<dc:creator>Ericg1840</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can&#039;t believe that they ranked the samsung omnia so high that phone is junk. I thought Verizon stopped selling it anyway cause of how bad it was&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that they ranked the samsung omnia so high that phone is junk. I thought Verizon stopped selling it anyway cause of how bad it was</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poop Smells Good</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60428</link>
		<dc:creator>Poop Smells Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60428</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I get Consumer Reports monthly.  One month they rated the Black Berry Storm a &quot;CR Best Buy&quot;.  There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn&#039;t top tier.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Although I do believe the 3Gs is a top tier phone, I don&#039;t put much stock into what Consumer Reports has to say about electronic gadgets, computers, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get Consumer Reports monthly.  One month they rated the Black Berry Storm a &#8220;CR Best Buy&#8221;.  There other instances where they gave a product a good rating which I knew from experience wasn&#8217;t top tier.  </p>

<p>Although I do believe the 3Gs is a top tier phone, I don&#8217;t put much stock into what Consumer Reports has to say about electronic gadgets, computers, etc.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60425</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We all knew the iPhone pawns the Pre, why did we need numbers to tell us?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all knew the iPhone pawns the Pre, why did we need numbers to tell us?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60423</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60423</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m surprised that Pre was last, it opened to very little disappointment! But I guess the people who actually use it don&#039;t like it as much as the gadget blogs do :P&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;iPhone is always on top of customer satisfaction. See, people argue about which phone is the &#039;best&#039;, and I think these surveys tell you, because it&#039;s really about how satisfied you are with the device. You can&#039;t deny these numbers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised that Pre was last, it opened to very little disappointment! But I guess the people who actually use it don&#8217;t like it as much as the gadget blogs do <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>iPhone is always on top of customer satisfaction. See, people argue about which phone is the &#8216;best&#8217;, and I think these surveys tell you, because it&#8217;s really about how satisfied you are with the device. You can&#8217;t deny these numbers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.allen</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60418</link>
		<dc:creator>d.allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60418</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With all the Pre talk, I&#039;m surprised that it finished last.. Good job to apple for having the top two, when only being in the market for 3 years.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the Pre talk, I&#8217;m surprised that it finished last.. Good job to apple for having the top two, when only being in the market for 3 years.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffdc5</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/07/03/iphone-3gs-1-smart-phone-ratings/comment-page-1/#comment-60415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffdc5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=9717#comment-60415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ohh boy here comes the pre hate why did you have to mention it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh boy here comes the pre hate why did you have to mention it?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 21:49:38 -->
