<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod touch Speed Test: How Much Faster is 50%?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PT</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-256744</link>
		<dc:creator>PT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-256744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Percent of&quot; is not the same as &quot;percent faster than.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;Percent faster than&quot; is a kind of &quot;percent change.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;50% is a special case where &quot;percent of&quot; and &quot;percent change&quot; are the same number. But note below what 100 percent faster than really means.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Consider the following...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;50% of 30 seconds is 15 seconds. -- 
10% of 30 seconds is 3 seconds. -- &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;15 seconds is 50% &quot;of&quot; 30 seconds AND 50% &quot;faster than&quot; 30 seconds
 3 seconds is 10% &quot;of&quot; 30 seconds BUT 90% &quot;faster than&quot; 30 seconds&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The two formulas in question are these:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Percent of = X/Y * 100%
percent change = X-Y/Y * 100&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3/30 * 100% = 10% (3 is 10% of 30)
3-30/30 * 100% = -90% (3 is 90% less than 30)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, if 3 is 90% less than (faster than) 30, what is 100% faster than 30?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It must be zero.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;0-30/30 * 100% = -100%&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Percent of&#8221; is not the same as &#8220;percent faster than.&#8221; </p>

<p>&#8220;Percent faster than&#8221; is a kind of &#8220;percent change.&#8221; </p>

<p>50% is a special case where &#8220;percent of&#8221; and &#8220;percent change&#8221; are the same number. But note below what 100 percent faster than really means.</p>

<p>Consider the following&#8230;</p>

<p>50% of 30 seconds is 15 seconds. &#8212; 
10% of 30 seconds is 3 seconds. &#8212; </p>

<p>15 seconds is 50% &#8220;of&#8221; 30 seconds AND 50% &#8220;faster than&#8221; 30 seconds
 3 seconds is 10% &#8220;of&#8221; 30 seconds BUT 90% &#8220;faster than&#8221; 30 seconds</p>

<p>The two formulas in question are these:</p>

<p>Percent of = X/Y * 100%
percent change = X-Y/Y * 100</p>

<p>3/30 * 100% = 10% (3 is 10% of 30)
3-30/30 * 100% = -90% (3 is 90% less than 30)</p>

<p>Now, if 3 is 90% less than (faster than) 30, what is 100% faster than 30?</p>

<p>It must be zero.</p>

<p>0-30/30 * 100% = -100%</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derfuhrer</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-157416</link>
		<dc:creator>derfuhrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-157416</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;if it runs twice as fast wouldnt that be 200% faster&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it runs twice as fast wouldnt that be 200% faster</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xtyp</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76638</link>
		<dc:creator>xtyp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76638</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@27th&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Start thinking about learning to count.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@27th</p>

<p>Start thinking about learning to count.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;All are wrong!!! It is faster because Apple said it is. Never mind how fast, just go out and spend spend spend.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All are wrong!!! It is faster because Apple said it is. Never mind how fast, just go out and spend spend spend.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whatabout</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76261</link>
		<dc:creator>whatabout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76261</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So what&#039;s the battery life like in comparison? For example, how many hours of play in a given game/app on the new device vs the old one?
Always good to know if the increase in performance has sapped battery life.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what&#8217;s the battery life like in comparison? For example, how many hours of play in a given game/app on the new device vs the old one?
Always good to know if the increase in performance has sapped battery life.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milkfat</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76260</link>
		<dc:creator>milkfat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76260</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dickalan: it&#039;s 50% FASTER.  You are correct that 50% is .5, but saying &quot;I improved my speed by 50%&quot; does not mean you took twice as long to finish.  It means you multiply your old speed by .5 and add that to your old speed.  Essentially you&#039;re doing 3 units of work in the amount of time it used to take you to do 2 units of work.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dickalan: it&#8217;s 50% FASTER.  You are correct that 50% is .5, but saying &#8220;I improved my speed by 50%&#8221; does not mean you took twice as long to finish.  It means you multiply your old speed by .5 and add that to your old speed.  Essentially you&#8217;re doing 3 units of work in the amount of time it used to take you to do 2 units of work.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dickalan</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76256</link>
		<dc:creator>Dickalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You guys need a refresh, what is 50 percent as a decimal ..  .5    100 percent is 1 and 200 percent is 2, so if the touch is twice as fast then it is 200 percent faster&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys need a refresh, what is 50 percent as a decimal ..  .5    100 percent is 1 and 200 percent is 2, so if the touch is twice as fast then it is 200 percent faster</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the_other_me</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76245</link>
		<dc:creator>the_other_me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76245</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;nay says the scientist. If you say &quot;faster than&quot; then you&#039;re using the first object as the reference. thus 100% faster would be correct&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nay says the scientist. If you say &#8220;faster than&#8221; then you&#8217;re using the first object as the reference. thus 100% faster would be correct</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdibleFetus</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76243</link>
		<dc:creator>EdibleFetus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;TapTap is correct. Its speed not duration. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if &#039;A&#039; moves at 100mph and &#039;B&#039; moves at 150mph then B is 50% faster or a 50% increase.
To confuse the subject more you could also say that &#039;B&#039; moves at 150% of the speed of &#039;A&#039;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TapTap is correct. Its speed not duration. </p>

<p>if &#8216;A&#8217; moves at 100mph and &#8216;B&#8217; moves at 150mph then B is 50% faster or a 50% increase.
To confuse the subject more you could also say that &#8216;B&#8217; moves at 150% of the speed of &#8216;A&#8217;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBD</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76241</link>
		<dc:creator>TBD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76241</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, Tap Tap, doing the math, you&#039;re right.  For the increase in speed it should be 100%.  I concede! :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Tap Tap, doing the math, you&#8217;re right.  For the increase in speed it should be 100%.  I concede! <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TapTap</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76236</link>
		<dc:creator>TapTap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76236</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree, &quot;faster&quot; refers to speed, not to duration, and half the wait means twice the speed.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, &#8220;faster&#8221; refers to speed, not to duration, and half the wait means twice the speed.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBD</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76234</link>
		<dc:creator>TBD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76234</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;David is right. You have to place the percentage on the newer or faster object.  The car analogy stands but the percentage is on the faster car: 100mph vs. 200mph.  50% of 200mph is 100mph, thus a 50% increase. Right???&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David is right. You have to place the percentage on the newer or faster object.  The car analogy stands but the percentage is on the faster car: 100mph vs. 200mph.  50% of 200mph is 100mph, thus a 50% increase. Right???</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76233</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;100% faster would be virtually down to zero (or instantaneous)....  So 50% faster is correct...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% faster would be virtually down to zero (or instantaneous)&#8230;.  So 50% faster is correct&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TapTap</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76231</link>
		<dc:creator>TapTap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@kaydot: You are right indeed. 100% faster. I was about to post the same remark whan I saw your comment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kaydot: You are right indeed. 100% faster. I was about to post the same remark whan I saw your comment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76230</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;if it goes from 10 to 5 seconds, it&#039;s 50 percent faster because it&#039;s 50 percent of 10.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;if it goes from 5 to 10 seconds, it&#039;s 100 percent slower, because it&#039;s 100 percent of 5.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it goes from 10 to 5 seconds, it&#8217;s 50 percent faster because it&#8217;s 50 percent of 10.</p>

<p>if it goes from 5 to 10 seconds, it&#8217;s 100 percent slower, because it&#8217;s 100 percent of 5.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xxtoni</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76225</link>
		<dc:creator>xxtoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76225</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Chico
Dude,did you ever see a site in mobile safari,it looks almost the same as on the desktop...
and every other browser is just...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chico
Dude,did you ever see a site in mobile safari,it looks almost the same as on the desktop&#8230;
and every other browser is just&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaydot</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76223</link>
		<dc:creator>kaydot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76223</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If it&#039;s loading in half the time, then it&#039;s &quot;Twice as fast&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I believe that means it is &quot;%100 faster&quot; in normal terms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s a weird discussion because we are used to thinking of % faster in the other direction.  A car that is traveling 100mph is traveling half as fast as one at 200mph.
The car at 200mph is 100% faster than the car at 100mph.
A car at 300mph is 200% faster than the car at 100mph.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this all makes sense.  Please correct!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s loading in half the time, then it&#8217;s &#8220;Twice as fast&#8221;.</p>

<p>I believe that means it is &#8220;%100 faster&#8221; in normal terms.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s a weird discussion because we are used to thinking of % faster in the other direction.  A car that is traveling 100mph is traveling half as fast as one at 200mph.
The car at 200mph is 100% faster than the car at 100mph.
A car at 300mph is 200% faster than the car at 100mph.</p>

<p>I think this all makes sense.  Please correct!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S dog</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76221</link>
		<dc:creator>S dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76221</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No C that would be 200% faster&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No C that would be 200% faster</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chico Fandenzi</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76220</link>
		<dc:creator>Chico Fandenzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve just gone to New York Times on the N97, 5 seconds over 3G, now that&#039;s better !&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just gone to New York Times on the N97, 5 seconds over 3G, now that&#8217;s better !</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toha</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76192</link>
		<dc:creator>Toha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76192</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So the hardware is impressive,and i reAlly lack some RAM to start Gangstar so 3g will be a good gaming device.even without the camera&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the hardware is impressive,and i reAlly lack some RAM to start Gangstar so 3g will be a good gaming device.even without the camera</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raúl</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76112</link>
		<dc:creator>Raúl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76112</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@C 
good call!!! I was thinking exactly the same thing!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@C 
good call!!! I was thinking exactly the same thing!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J-Red</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76094</link>
		<dc:creator>J-Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76094</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;8th...lol&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8th&#8230;lol</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76085</link>
		<dc:creator>Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76085</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;7th......&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7th&#8230;&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76045</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76045</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If things load twice as fast wouldn&#039;t that be 100% faster?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If things load twice as fast wouldn&#8217;t that be 100% faster?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76038</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76038</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No joke Andy. I&#039;ve seen you write first on several stories. Are you just following the Twitter and jumping on it first or what? In short, get a life.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No joke Andy. I&#8217;ve seen you write first on several stories. Are you just following the Twitter and jumping on it first or what? In short, get a life.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XM_JDM</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76036</link>
		<dc:creator>XM_JDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Andy&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;loser!!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously? Get a life buddy.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andy</p>

<p>loser!!!</p>

<p>Seriously? Get a life buddy.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jersagfast</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-76007</link>
		<dc:creator>Jersagfast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-76007</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hate imposters..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate imposters..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icebike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-75997</link>
		<dc:creator>icebike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-75997</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ever notice how these guys: http://www.iphonehill.com/ just seem to scrape entire stories from TiPb?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever notice how these guys: <a href="http://www.iphonehill.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.iphonehill.com/</a> just seem to scrape entire stories from TiPb?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/15/ipod-touch-speed-test-faster-50/comment-page-1/#comment-75985</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=11804#comment-75985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;First!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 21:42:00 -->
