News

Apple lawyers claim Samsung lawyer's 'jihadist' comparisons are making talks difficult, Samsung says Apple's being difficult

Links

Apple vs. Samsung: The smartphone war summarized

News

Shocker: Samsung obfuscated dismal tablet sales

News

Court overrules Samsung's objection to Apple-highlighted video explaining patents to jurors

News

Apple sanctions Samsung for sharing confidential data, then releases it anyway

News

German court denies patent troll $2.15 billion of Apple's money

Links

Why Lenovo could be a far bigger threat to Samsung than Apple

News

Jury says Samsung owes Apple another $290 million

News

Apple not involved in Rockstar's decision to sue Google

News

Google fined $17 million over Safari cookie caper

News

New survey says 3 times as many Samsung users switch to iPhone than the other way around

News

The iPhone 4 row continues: South Korea decries 'protectionist' U.S. government

Links

How the ITC ignoring Samsung's FRAND-abuse forced a veto in Apple's favor

iPhone

Obama administration overrules ITC ban on iPhone 4, iPad 2

Samsung's S Voice likes to think it's Siri

Samsung design video: High on lifestyle companionship, low on rationale for cheap plastics

News

Apple sued by Chinese animation studio over pirated materials in apps

Hands-on: iPhone 5 vs. Galaxy S4

On the eve of Samsung's Galaxy S4 event, Apple's Phil Schiller repeats that Android is fragmented, lacks integration, offers poor experience

News

Judge vacates $450 million in damages from Apple vs. Samsung, orders new trial to re-determine amount

< >

Apple vs. Samsung: Secrets allowed!

Apple and Samsung can keep some information secret, Appeals Court rules

Neither Apple nor Samsung will be forced to reveal sensitive information when the two companies head back to court in November for the second round of their patent dispute. Judge Lucy Koh had originally ordered both companies to disclose certain information about sales and profits that Apple and Samsung wanted to keep private. Judge Koh's order was overruled by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to All Things D:

A U.S. appeals court ruled Friday that U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh shouldn’t have ordered Apple and Samsung to disclose “exceptionally sensitive information” about their sales and profits. Koh maintained that the disclosure of such information was in the public interest, but the three-judge panel at the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Washington disagreed.

The panel held that the information that would have been disclosed would not have been relevant to the case, and that curiosity was not a sufficient reason for such an order by Judge Koh. The disclosure would have quite possibly been harmful to the competitive interests of both Apple and Samsung. Last October, Judge Koh held that Apple could not expect to be paid billions of dollars as part of the judgment for Apple v Samsung and keep the data they used to reach that number a secret.

Of course, the NSA likely already knows, so why not simply ask them? (We kid, we kid, please don't come for us!)

Source: All Things D, Ars Technica

Joseph Keller

Joseph Keller is a news reporter for iMore. He's also chilling out and having a sandwich.

More Posts

 

5
loading...
0
loading...
30
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Apple's rumored iPhone trade-in program launching as soon as next month

Next up →

Latest Marvel Unlimited update means more offline comic books for you!

Reader comments

Apple vs. Samsung: Secrets allowed!

3 Comments
Sort by Rating

Judge Lucy Cutie is very very curious, indeed. Many many obvious issues she has missed .... no need for me to clarify further, however! ;)

With that said, too late Joseph .... we come for us! LOL