Apple lawyers claim Samsung lawyer's 'jihadist' comparisons are making talks difficult, Samsung says Apple's being difficult

Apple lawyers claim Samsung lawyer's 'jihadist' comparisons are making talks difficult, Samsung says Apple's being difficult

Apple and Samsung were revealed to be in fresh settlement talks to put these billion-dollar lawsuits behind them, but it turns out that talking smack about each other over the past few years whilst being engaged in said lawsuits has made things, shall we say… difficult. In fact, judging by the tone of statements issued by both lawyers to the court that ordered, one might think they don't even want this to work and just want to spend the next decade litigating. Anything's possible, we suppose.

But what we really have here is more or less manufactured outrage. Apple's statement to the court expressed their anger over how Samsung's lead attorney referred to Apple as "jihadist" in one interview, and in another said the long-running trials were "Apple's Vietnam" (excepting that Apple has come out victorious in the majority of cases).

Samsung, on the other hand, claims that Apple has been "posturing about Apple's purported trial victories and demanding that Samsung agree to various conditions" before continuing resolution talks.

For these lawyers, these statements and posturing are just that — statements and posturing. They're highly trained and highly paid professionals (not to mention adults) with the ability to put aside this sort of nonsense and publicity. If they really wanted to get down to brass tacks and start talking numbers, they'd be doing just that instead of complaining to the court about what amounts to smack talk and insults. The court had little choice but to send them back to an arbitration attempt, but we wouldn't be surprised to see the lawyers of Apple and Samsung squaring off yet again in a San Jose courtroom in the relatively near future.

The question is, what's left to gain at this point?

Source: US District Court [Scribd]; Via: The Verge

Have something to say about this story? Leave a comment! Need help with something else? Ask in our forums!

Derek Kessler

Managing Editor of Mobile Nations, occasional web designer, Army musician, armchair pundit, news addict, all-around nerd, professional ranter, and user of many phones.

More Posts



← Previously

Watch all the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games from your iPhone and iPad

Next up →

Apple's iPad trade-in program spreads to Europe

Reader comments

Apple lawyers claim Samsung lawyer's 'jihadist' comparisons are making talks difficult, Samsung says Apple's being difficult


Agreed. As an Apple user, I typically take their side, but I'm so tired of the lawsuits that I don't really care who wins.

Sent from the iMore App

I'm guessing that like ever other aspect of the trial, Samsung is far more in the wrong than Apple on these issues. Samsung is just pissed that they (mostly) lost, when in fact they should consider themselves lucky to have escaped far worse judgements.

I think that since Apple did break some Samsung patents, there is no "more in the right" or "more in the wrong", both are wrong. One could even argue that the Samsung patents involved more R&D investment than Apple patents, such as "slide to unlock". In the end, it was 5 patents for Apple versus 4 for Samsung.

Apple almost got in trouble in Brazil for doing the exact same thing it accuses Samsung, ignoring other companies rights hoping no one would notice, and that almost cost Apple the registry of the iPhone brand there, it got saved by a technicality when Apple could have made a deal from the get go and saved everybody the legal fees and court time.

Look, Apple has its issues, but anyone who has tried to do business with Samsung will tell you just how difficult and ridiculous a company they are. I've seen large profitable opportunities thrown out the door because vendors just can't stand working with the idiocy and nonsense that happens at samsung.

Sent from the iMore App