UK appellate judge that ruled for Samsung now consults for them

UK judge that ruled for Samsung now consults for them

Sir Robin Jacob, one of three appeals judges that upheld the ruling forcing Apple to publicly apologize to Samsung in UK newspapers, is now being paid as an expert by Samsung. Only four months after the ruling, Jacobs is named as one of nine experts on a submission of protective order subscriptions, which are steps Samsung will take to ensure that it complies with the ITC’s confidentiality rules in a case brought against Samsung by Ericsson. Florian Müller of Foss Patents says:

I'm sure that Samsung and Sir Robin Jacob wouldn't be doing this if there was any risk of this conduct violating the law. Apparently an ex-judge who is invited to rule on a case involving a given party is not barred by existing UK rules (though this case here may spark a debate whether some reform is needed) from being hired by the same party in another litigation outside the UK less than four months later.

So while it might be ethically dubious, there’s nothing technically wrong with it. Still, it certainly doesn’t sit right.This sort of practice is certainly not uncommon for a retired public official. Jacobs would not be a paid expert for Samsung unless everything was completely legal. However, rightly or wrongly, it could be seen as sending a message that corporate paydays await. Imagine the judge who awarded Apple $1 billion in damages from Samsung later got hired as a consultant by Apple. While not exactly parallel, the media outcry would no doubt be enormous.

What do you think, should judges that rule on a case be allowed to consult for the winning party after only a few months? Should the length of time be longer to avoid even the appearance of impropriety?

Source: Foss Patents

Joseph Keller

Joseph Keller is a news reporter for iMore. He's also chilling out and having a sandwich.

More Posts

 

5
loading...
0
loading...
72
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

How to delete individual call records from Recent Calls on your iPhone

Next up →

YouTube for iOS updated, can now send video to your TV or game console

There are 8 comments. Add yours.

lungho says:

It doesn't matter what side of the pond you are on. All courts/are corrupt; some more than others. This is just par for the course.

projectman says:

It is disturbing when someone with the power to rule in a case like that takes a job from the winner. It certainly gives the appearance of impropriety...even if it is legal. No, a judge in that position should have to wait a reasonable amount of time before accepting money from the litigator to whom he awarded a win.

Nathan Grey says:

While this might not be a violation of ethics, it certainly looks unethical.

Dev from tipb says:

It certainly does seem fishy...though, given his paid history with Oracle and failure to disclose it before, during, and after the Oracle-Google trials until found out by Groklaw readers, Florian is hardly the one the cast any ethical stones.

drewfus0929 says:

I was about to post about this, glad someone else already knows about it. For those who aren't sure what he is talking about:

http://9to5google.com/2013/02/28/microsoftoracle-paid-anti-google-blogge...

return_0 says:

Aaaaand, here come the haters, pointing to this as "suspicious activity" when this is nothing compared to what happens in some other courts, probably even those that ruled in Apple's favor.

Hail Caesar says:

More corruption, not to surprising though.