Part of agreement between Apple and HTC to become public

Part of agreement between Apple and HTC to become public

A judge in California has ruled that major details surrounding the Apple-HTC settlement will be publicly available. The pricing and royalty rates will remain confidential, but the patents that were part of the settlement will be open to the public. Previously, Samsung’s lawyers were given access to the list of patents in this settlement as part of their preparations for a hearing that will determine the final details of Apple’s legal victory over Samsung in August. Apple had sought to keep the list of patents confidential, but Judge Lucy Koh saw no compelling reason to keep these details from the public. CNET reports:

In an ruling tonight, U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh said that while details of pricing and royalty rates for patents from both companies should be kept under wraps from public view, the same does not hold true for the rest of the agreement.

Some of the patents in question include methods and behaviors of scrolling and zooming, which Apple may license, while others are so-called “untouchables”, unique user experience patents, which Apple rarely shares with other companies. Samsung may hope that if Apple did indeed reach an agreement with HTC on these untouchable patents in particular, that they can avoid an injunction. Apple and Samsung’s hearing is scheduled for this Thursday, December 6.

Source: CNET

Joseph Keller

Joseph Keller is a news reporter for iMore. He's also chilling out and having a sandwich.

More Posts

 

0
loading...
0
loading...
30
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

AnoStyle anodized color options for iPhone, iPad now available

Next up →

How to replace the volume buttons in an iPhone 4S

There are 2 comments. Add yours.

Snowman81 says:

I'd love to hear how much money is trading hands between Apple and HTC....but I guess we might never find that out.

Dev from tipb says:

IANAL, but summary as to why this would avoid an injunction:

Injunctions are typically granted when one company can demonstrate irreparable harm if another company is allowed to continue while the legal process drags on. It is a high bar, because it can cripple the operations of an innocent defendant. If Apple has licensed patents relevant to the Samsung case, it becomes almost impossible for them to argue irreparable harm, because Apple would have set a price on their use. Apple is under no obligation to license those patents to Samsung at this or any other price, but the fact that Apple identified concrete values with somebody should persuade Judge Koh to order some sort of escrow or bond holding based on these values, rather than an injunction on Samsung products.

That is, if the HTC patents are the same as the Samsung patents. If not, it would have little or no relevance on Judge Koh's decisions.