<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iMore &#187; megapixel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/tag/megapixel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone is Flickr King Once Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/08/12/iphone-is-flickr-king-once-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imore.com/2008/08/12/iphone-is-flickr-king-once-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Casey Chan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[king of flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megapixel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=3766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2008/08/iphone-flickr-2.jpg"></a>We had <a href="http://www.imore.com/2008/05/07/most-popular-camera-phone-on-flickr-the-iphone/">originally reported that the iPhone was the most popular camera phone on Flickr</a>, the popular photo sharing website, way back in May, pre-3G. Well, it lost that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2008/08/iphone-flickr-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3767" src="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2008/08/iphone-flickr-2.jpg" alt="" width="224" height="400" /></a>We had <a href="http://www.imore.com/2008/05/07/most-popular-camera-phone-on-flickr-the-iphone/">originally reported that the iPhone was the most popular camera phone on Flickr</a>, the popular photo sharing website, way back in May, pre-3G. Well, it lost that title for a brief moment and only re-gained it recently. I&#8217;m only guessing but it probably had to do with the 3 million iPhone 3Gs that took the market by storm. Either way, the iPhone being the King of Flickr should force Apple to take notice and improve the camera already.</p>

<p>Where&#8217;s my auto-focus, zoom, better resolution, better lens, video, etc. !? I think Apple is severely underestimating the appeal of a great camera. Hopefully, they&#8217;ll recognize the iPhone Camera&#8217;s limitation and create an industry-leading device. We here at TiPb like to dream big.</p>

<p>What do you think?
</p><p class="read"><a href="http://flickr.com/cameras/">Read</a><span><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2008/08/11/iphone-kicking-butt-on-flickr/">Via</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imore.com/2008/08/12/iphone-is-flickr-king-once-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mo&#8217; Camera Mo&#8217; Better? For the iPhone, Maybe Not&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/19/mo-camera-mo-better-for-the-iphone-maybe-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/19/mo-camera-mo-better-for-the-iphone-maybe-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megapixel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=2853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long and loud have been the voices berating, bemoaning&#8230; begging even for some little extra bit of camera love from the iPhone. We&#8217;re not even talking video here (though conflicting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2008/06/iphone_camera.jpg" alt="iPhone Camera" title="iPhone Camera" width="394" height="269" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2854" /></p>

<p>Long and loud have been the voices berating, bemoaning&#8230; begging even for some little extra bit of camera love from the iPhone. We&#8217;re not even talking video here (though conflicting rumors coming out of WWDC, via TWiM, suggested Apple either thinks no one wants video, or were working on it for a future release&#8230;). We&#8217;re talking about plain old, plainly old, still photography.</p>

<p>Nokia N95 has a Karl Zeiss 5.0 megapixel auto-focusing lens, right? Sure, it&#8217;s built like a Soviet tank, but Apple could at least bump the pixel count on the measly iPhone camera, right?</p>

<p>Wrong!</p>

<p>At least according to an interesting new article from Ars Technica, which provocatively suggests <a href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/06/18/more-iphone-camera-megapixels-would-be-worse-not-better">more iPhone camera megapixels would be worse, not better</a>.</p>

<p>Their arguments make the kind of sense that does, at least to a certain extent. Carving up the same sensor into more megapixels just results in less surface area per pixel, and given the fixed-focus lens necessary in a uber-thin device like the iPhone, it&#8217;s possible Apple&#8217;s really looked into this and come up with the best engineering compromise they could.</p>

<p>Or they might just be saving a 3 or 4 megapixel auto-focus bump, along with video, to get people to upgrade to the iPhone 3.5G this holiday season. @#$%^&amp;!</p>

<p>Even odds, really&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/19/mo-camera-mo-better-for-the-iphone-maybe-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 16:55:02 -->
