History of iPhone 5s: The most forward thinking iPhone ever

History of iPhone 5s: The most forward thinking iPhone ever

Leading up to the iPhone 6 event we're updating and expanding our series on the history of the iPhone, continuing with the most forward thinking one ever — the iPhone 5s

Apple's event on September 10, 2013 was unique in their history — they introduced not one but two new phones on stage that day. The first was a re-imagining of the previous year's model in a new, more colorful form. It was the past made present. The second was all about the future. It was, as Phil Schiller called it, the most forward thinking iPhone ever. It was the iPhone 5s.

iPhone 5s is the most forward-thinking smartphone in the world, delivering desktop class architecture in the palm of your hand. iPhone 5s sets a new standard for smartphones, packed into its beautiful and refined design are breakthrough features that really matter to people, like Touch ID, a simple and secure way to unlock your phone with just a touch of your finger.

The gold standard

The iPhone 5s, codenamed N51 and model number iPhone6,1, kept the same design as the previous year's iPhone 5, something that had become a hallmark of Apple's S-class phones. (The shift from uppercase S to lowercase s in the branding was likely a visual concession — 5S has a great chance of being confused for 55 than 5s does.) That meant the iPhone 5s kept the same 4-inch, 1136x640 pixel, 326ppi, 16:9 aspect ratio display, and the same in-cell technology that made the pixels look like they were fused right into the screen.

The same aluminum unibody was kept as well, with its ceramic glass inlays on the back for RF transparency and its diamond chamfered edges. And that was a problem. Apple was already dealing with a media and mindset that found the incredible advances in manufacturing used on the iPhone 5 boring. How could they change that sentiment if the design itself wasn't changing? Turns out by giving people differences that were only skin deep. By giving them a new color.

The original iPhone had been available only in aluminum and black. The iPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS had black front plates but offered both black and white back plate options. The iPhone 4 and iPhone 4s had come, front and back, in black or white. The iPhone 5 was two tone, but those tones were still black and slate gray, and white and silver. The iPhone 5s added white and gold. Jokingly referred to as Kardashian, a reference to the celebrity having had her iPhone 5 re-anodized in gold earlier in the year. Apple didn't go for a deep gold, however. They went for a light, champagne gold.

While gold is the easiest colors to anodize, black remained the hardest. After dealing with scratches and chips on the black and slate gray iPhone 5, Apple switched to black and space gray on the iPhone 5s. It wasn't a big change in terms of shade, but it proved to be a giant leap when it came to resiliency.

The moonshots, however, were all on the inside. Having previously taken a crack at spinning their own processor design with the A6's Swift, Apple went all out on the Apple A7. They licensed the newer, cleaner ARMv7 instruction set and made the Cyclone, the world's first 64-bit mainstream mobile processor. That they got to 64-bit before the likes of Samsung and Qualcomm, who manufacture chips, was as impressive for technologists as it was galling for those two companies.

The Apple A7 was 28nm, dual-core, and 1.3GHz, paired with an OpenGL 3.0 capable PowerVR Series 6 (Rogue) G6430, and 1GB of DDR 3 RAM. The RAM proved to little for demands of 64-bit apps, with Safari routinely reloading even a couple or a few tabs, and background apps being jettisoned more quickly than they might otherwise have been. However, more RAM means higher power consumption, and complaints about reloading might just as easily be dwarfed by complaints of lower battery life. Apple needs to strike a balance, or come up with a new equation...

Unlike previous S-class releases, and unlike the iPad, the solid state storage limit didn't increase — 64GB remained the top of the line.

With the Apple A7 came the secure enclave, a coprocessor that handled encryption, including the brand new Touch ID fingerprint identification sensor. When a finger was placed on the Home button a capacitive ring detected it and a high resolution snapshot was triggered. That snapshot was converted to math and then destroyed. The math passed through a hardware channel to the secure enclave where it was compared again up to 5 registered prints and, if matched, triggered the release of a "yes" token to enable authorization for unlock or authentication for purchase. It was a clever solution to a real problem.

Security is always at war with convenience. Apple's numbers showed only half of their hundreds of millions of customers used a 4-digit passcode on their iPhones. Touch ID would allow people to authenticate and their iPhones — and authorize purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBooks Store — simply by placing their finger on the Home button. Less secure than a long, alphanumeric password, but much more likely to be used than even a weak passcode, in the endless war between security and convenience, it was a good compromise.

There was some initial concern as to how reliable Touch ID would be. Fingerprint sensors on competing devices had been considerably less than stellar to date. There was also a lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) spread right after launch. There were videos of people making fake fingerprints to spoof the system. There was also a problem with the method intended to improve reliability with each and every read of the fingerprint — sometimes it took a wrong turn. The FUD failed, the spoofs were understood in context, and Apple ultimately released updates to iOS 7 to fix the reliability.

Touch ID ended up doing what it was intended to do — make security easy enough that most people, most of the time, would actually use it. And according to Apple's numbers, it worked. The number of people using a passcode leapt from 41% pre-Touch ID to 83% post-Touch ID.

The Apple A7 also included the Apple M7, a motion coprocessor, a type of sensor fusion hub. Codenamed Oscar, the M7 is believed to be an NXP LPC1800 micro-controller based on an ARM Cortex M3 processor that collects and keeps a week's worth of motion data, including the built-in accelerometer, magnometer (digital compass), and gyroscope. It does this so that the Apple A7 can stay powered down and simply request motion data when and if it needs it, rather than staying powered on to collect it itself. In other words, the M7 saved us all battery life.

The image signal processor (ISP) in the Apple A7 also improved the built-in iSight camera, including allowing for 120fps slow-motion video, 30fps panorama capture, live video zoom, intelligent burst mode, dynamic local tone mapping, 2x faster focusing, autofocus matrix metering, and electronic image stabilization (EIS).

Beyond the chipset, the iPhone 5s' iSight camera is still a Sony IMX145 and Exmor-RS CMOS sensor but size has gone up from 1.4 to 1.5 microns, and aperture from f/2.4 to f/2/2. This combined for a 33% increase in light sensitivity. Apple also added a bicolor TrueTone flash that had both yellow and white elements to better match existing color temperatures.

The front FaceTime camera also got a boost, from 1.75 to 1.9 microns, with backside illumination (BSI) thrown in for good measure.

Bluetooth and Wi-Fi stayed functionally the same, though the radio changed to a Broadcom BCM43342. Near-field communications (NFC) remained missing in action (MIA). The Qualcomm MDM9615M LTE 4G radio, however, gave the iPhone 5s support for 13 bands, though it took 5 different models to get there.

Price, not surprisingly, stayed the same. The iPhone 5s launched starting at $199 on-contract for 16GB, with $299 and $399 options for 32GB and 64GB respectively.

More powerful than you think

The iPhone 5s launched on September 20, 2013 in the U.S., Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, Puerto Rico, Singapore and the U.K. It's hard to say how many were sold that first weekend because the iPhone 5c was sold along with it and Apple doesn't break down numbers per model. Apple did say they sold 9 million iPhones combined that weekend, and some analysts have estimated the iPhone 5s accounted for about 6.75 million of those. Tim cook, via Apple:

This is our best iPhone launch yet―more than nine million new iPhones sold―a new record for first weekend sales. The demand for the new iPhones has been incredible, and while we've sold out of our initial supply of iPhone 5s, stores continue to receive new iPhone shipments regularly. We appreciate everyone's patience and are working hard to build enough new iPhones for everyone.

People made fun of of the gold iPhone both after it leaked and when it was announced. Then they panicked when they couldn't get one come launch day, week, or month. Funny things, we humans are. Best of all (or worst of all, depending on your perspective), going gold worked. Apple got little to none of the negative reaction to the iPhone 5s design that they'd gotten to the iPhone 5. Scratch the surface and what do most people want? More surface. As always, Apple wasn't targeting iPhone 5 owners with the iPhone 5s — though Touch ID, iSight, and the 64-bit Apple A7 struck straight to the hearts of early adopters — but rather iPhone 4s and previous device owners looking for a more significant upgrade.

Reviews were good.

Anand Lal Shimpi for AnandTech:

At the end of the day, if you prefer iOS for your smartphone - the iPhone 5s won't disappoint. In many ways it's an evolutionary improvement over the iPhone 5, but in others it is a significant step forward. What Apple's silicon teams have been doing for these past couple of years has really started to pay off. From a CPU and GPU standpoint, the 5s is probably the most futureproof of any iPhone ever launched. As much as it pains me to use the word futureproof, if you are one of those people who likes to hold onto their device for a while - the 5s is as good a starting point as any.

Joanna Stern for ABC:

The iPhone 5s is a great phone, especially if you are upgrading from the iPhone 4 or 4s, but it's not as compelling if you have the iPhone 5 or even some competing Android handsets. When it comes to camera performance, the security convenience provided by the fingerprint reader, general design and app selection and quality, the iPhone 5s is at the top of the heap and does set the bar in the crowded smartphone market.

Yours truly for iMore:

Apple calls the iPhone 5s the most forward-thinking iPhone ever. Tock to the iPhone 5 tick, like previous S-class updates, that promise of the future is counterbalanced by an incredible amount of performance, optics, and special new features delivered right here in the present. When the iPhone 3GS launched with VGA video, I enjoyed the clever implementation even as I wanted more. Now I have 1080p and 120fps slow-motion in the palm of my hand. When the iPhone 4S launched, I enjoyed using Siri even as I dreamt of JARVIS. Siri still has far to go, but every year since it's done more, and better. Now, with the iPhone 5s, I'm scratching in djay 2 and slashing in Infinity Blade III while imaging how far Apple can take 64-bit and OpenGL ES 3.0 on mobile and over AirPlay. And I'm buying them both with a fingerprint, even as I dream of everything else I'll eventually be able to buy with biometrics, and soon.

The iPhone 5 was a fantastic upgrade that never got the recognition it deserved. iPhone 5s builds on that foundation, and thanks to both iOS 7 on the inside and some gilding on the outside, perception is better reflecting reality than it has in years.

From burning platforms to fire sales

Competitors based on Qualcomm processors were caught flat-footed by the Apple A7. Samsung, which both made their own chipsets and used Qualcomm (don't ask), likewise. It would take them a year to even begin to catch up. That's not to say they didn't offer unique and compelling features all their own. Samsung made waterproofing mainstream with the Galaxy S5, and their Galaxy Note series, while not reaching the same popularity in North America as it did elsewhere, kept getting better at digitizers and bigger at screen sizes.

HTC continued to release good, if strangely branded, phones like the HTC One M8. Though consistently reviewed better than Samsung their sales haven't come close to catching up. Google sold Motorola to Lenovo, though there's every indication interesting phones like the Moto X will continue. Google also announced Android L, a preview of their next generation mobile operating system. Just as Apple has been moving from their foundation of excellent interactivity into new levels of functionality, so Google has been moving from excellent functionality into new levels of interactivity.

Nokia, it's value crushed by former Microsoft executive Stephan Elop, ended up being bought by outgoing Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, ostensibly to prevent Windows Phone's largest manufacturer from shifting to Android. The deal closed and Microsoft went on to ship Windows Phone 8.1 and Cortana, their Siri-like virtual assistant. They continue to have some level of traction, especially with lower cost devices in emerging markets, but like everyone else not-Apple and not-Samsung, haven't seen much increase in profitability in the rest of the market. New CEO, Satya Nadella comes from a cloud and services background, and Microsoft has been increasingly good at supporting the iPhone and iPad, so perhaps the future for them lies cross-platform?

BlackBerry, with Thorten Heins gone and former Sybase CEO, John Chen now in his place, shifted focus back towards the enterprise and doubled down on keyboards, announcing the upcoming BlackBerry Passport, a phone no one would ever mistake for just another post-iPhone slab. What and how much they can do with it, however, remains to be seen.

Seven years later

By 2013 Apple had gone from an early Project Experience Purple dream to as close to reality as technology would allow. The iPhone 5s took the physical form of the iPhone 5 and added internals that would set the platform on a course straight for the future. But what do you do when your original dreams have all been made manifest?

Why go on to better and bigger things, of course...

More on the history of the iPhone

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, Review, Vector, and MacBreak Weekly podcasts. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

More Posts

 

15
loading...
44
loading...
87
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Best iPhone action games without in-app purchases

Next up →

Despicable Me: Minion Rush tips, tricks, and cheats

Reader comments

History of iPhone 5s: The most forward thinking iPhone ever

24 Comments
Sort by Rating

these are great articles. I'm surprised you didn't provide the camera manufacturer and model (Sony IMX145 with a Exmor-RS sensor) like you did the other parts.

While I agree Jordan, I'm not sure I've been as happy with the 5s a year later than any other iPhone. Between my wife an I we've owned each model since 2007. Rene's article sums it up nicely. I may hold out this time. My wife has the '5' and will be updating. I'll make my decision from there. I feel like my larger display is covered by either iPad ...but iOS 8/OSx 10.10 and the continuity/handoff abilities. Swift and Metal programming, and the ability to use my iMac/MBP with our iPads and iPhones in harmony with the business. The 5s, hands down IMHO, has been the iPhone I've considered holding on to longer than a year (wife has always been happy to use my already 'Mophie cased' year old iPhone when the yearly AT&T updates stopped (4s). I think this year might be my year. I'm content. Everything about the phone is perfect and without complaints, I'll hang for the 6's' :)

"The most forward thinking iPhone ever" because of TouchID and its Secure Enclave. Security and authentication are crucial to what Apple wants to do in the near- and long-term. Contactless mobile payments, home automation with door unlocking and alarm system arm/disarm, collecting and analyzing health-related data, CarPlay with control of all manner of vehicle system, etc.

All of which requires strong security. So yes, the iPhone 5S is the forerunner of more advanced implementations of Touch ID and Secure Enclave. It paved the way for all manner of industry-level disruption, some of which might begin next month.

So my interpretation of their forward thinking claim is that I shouldn't need to upgrade to the next iPhone to enjoy the majority of what it will have to offer for quite some time as my 5s was built to last for quite some time. It's running beautifully and I hope it continues to do so with future ios updates.

Right. I am sure I would love to have an iPhone 6, but my 5s is running great, and I expect it to do so under iOS 8. I think iOS 8 will transform my almost one-year old device and I'm sure many iPhone 5c and iPhone 5 owners will be thinking the same way. I would also expect it to still run well under iOS 9, but I'm certain I will upgrade it by then. I usually upgrade every two years (3G->4->Samsung Galaxy S5 for a year->5s) but maybe I'll be seduced by the charms of the 6. My biggest issue is the keyboard. iOS 8 should address that, but I'll see how it goes for me.

Obsolescence is inevitable. My wife keeps an iPhone 4 as a second phone. It's 4 years old, and it struggles under iOS 7. My daughter's 16GB iPad 2 is slower than my iPad Air, but the only problem she has with it, is that she keeps running out of storage space.

Time will tell just how future-proof the iPhone 5s is, but one thing is for certain; it'll still be around for a while, and it'll continue to delight its large user-base.

Sent from the iMore App

Phil Schiller was wrong in saying desktop class processor just because it's 64 bit. At the end of the day it's still a mobile arm based CPU, but typical media spin of Apple. It is a great CPU design with the coprocessor. I don't agree with the comment about apple catching out Qualcomm and Samsung though for being the first with a 64 bit chip, android didn't support and still doesn't support 64 bit instruction sets so it was pointless for these companies to produce 64 bit chips. Given phones don't have more than 4 gb of ram and proper side by side multitasking a 64 bit CPU is mostly pointless at this stage even in the iPhone. That doesn't stop people wanting them though.

Yeah, no. It could run a netbook without much problem, I believe. And 4GB of addressable RAM is only — one — of the benefits of ARMv8.

There was a lot of dumb stuff written about 64-bit back then. Probably still now. It was a huge win for Apple, and it really did stun a lot of people in the industry.

Credit where credit is due.

A netbook is not a desktop, that doesn't even compare to desktop computing power except for maybe a desktop of many years ago. Phil didn't say it was a watered down netbook class cpu he said it was like a desktop class cpu which is a huge difference.

No, not a 'huge' difference. 64bit A7 with the v8 instruction set damn near drive the Quallcom crew off the road when they heard the announcement. To limit the 64bit optimizations to 'more RAM only' mantra is truly an ignorant take on what 64bit computing is. How it's effect is relevant on an SoC (this isn't a split CPU GPU and RAM w/PCIe lanes in a computer). As well the implementation of ARMv8, Quallcom and Samsung both that day took turns trying to figure out what the hell they were going to tell 'the board'. Just look at objective testing done today on the latest Snapdragon procs with twice the cores, clocked twice as high and with double to triple the RAM in comparison to the A7 with it's IT graphics solution from a year ago. Imagine what happens with the A8 @ almost double the clock speed. Possibly double the memory and almost triple the battery (5.5 rumors). As it is. Again objectively iPhone 5/5c/5s have done very very well in battery/efficiency tests as well in comparison to today's flagship samsung and Quallcom's silicon. Sure, it's been beaten with the 805/Adreno 420 But that's not the whole story. Try playing side by side the same game. The same app, whatever your choice of photo or video manipulation. I've got the Note 3 (business phone) & 5s as my personal phone. Playing Asphalt 8, using Facebook or even several Google 'made' apps, I've found time and time again the smooth, fluent iPhone to best my Note in literally any and every test I can think of or am interested in doing. Even the battery, if you don't use the Note it's amazing. Start taxing it and you can blow through those miiliamps pretty quick!

This is my favourite article by far as I have a 5s and I love it. Although Touch ID is starting to fail on me a bit. Otherwise it's mostly reliable. I heard The S5's fingerprint scanner is nowhere near Touch ID for reliability.

Sent from the iMore App

With Verizon I can't upgrade until September '15 since I bought my 5S last year. It runs great, it's 32 gig, I'd love a 6 but I'll stick it out 'til the 6S I suppose.

Sent from the iMore App

I tried the 5s and had to return it. It was beautifully designed, but the screen was just way too small. Granted, I was used to using a 5"+ device, but with eyes like mine, the eye strain was causing migraines. If the iPhone 6 is bigger, I will definitely consider it, especially with the updated keyboard!

Posted via the Android iMore App!

Great stuff! One nit-pick: The wikipedia entry suggests the A7 uses the ARMv8-A instruction set, and that the ARMv7 was in the previous A6 chip. :)

So pumped for the iPhone 6 now. These articles are great.

Is using a PIN so hard? TouchID is nice and all, I do use it sometimes, but I still put in the PIN faster.

Posted via iMore App

No, it's pretty simple but you're missing the bigger picture.

Now that I unlock with TouchID, my phone's password is a farily complex string of (seemingly) random letters and numbers. And I don't have to go through the pain of typing it every time.

If I didn't have TouchID, I'd be using a simple pin. Which is pretty easy to guess. With TouchID, I can make much better passwords, without having to actually type them out.

It's not a replacement for passwords. It's a complement for them, allowing you to strengthen them without giving up convenience.

(This is not unique to TouchID, I bet the same applies to any fingerprint scanner on the market too. I'm just speaking from my experience).

"However, more RAM means higher power consumption"

No, no, no. The amount of RAM does not mean higher consumption, at least not to the effect that it is at all noticeable.

Only the voltage at which the RAM is driven affects the power consumption, to any meaningful degree.

The display, CPU, GPU and various wireless radios consume most of the power, RAM is meaningless in this context.