Foursquare has revoked API access to the iOS app Girls Around Me, forcing them to take their tracking app down from the Apple App Store. This follows a scathing editorial on Cult of Mac in which the privacy implications of the app were called into question. The Russian developer, i-Free, has since issued a statement claiming that they've done nothing wrong, and that they're only using APIs on Foursquare and Facebook to enable users to find the names and locations of girls and guys nearby.
Girls Around Me is without a doubt a skeezy concept, and I'm all for raising internet privacy awareness -- Girls Around Me serves as a perfect example of why you want to be mindful of what you post online. Still, I think it's a little unfair to demonize the app and its developer. They were simply making a buck with the tools that were available and addressing an obvious demand. Is there anything stopping registered Foursquare users from monitoring recent check-ins at their favourite haunts and drilling down into those profiles to find linked Facebook accounts? It seems like Girls Around Me only simplified and monetized an activity that was (and still is) possible to engage in with anyone that had Foursquare and Facebook installed on their phone. Case in point, Foursquare didn't pull the API on moralistic grounds; they explained that it was done simply because of how i-Free was displaying the data.
Girls Around Me basically just made it so would-be stalkers wouldn't have to browse through each business individually, and could instead just glance at a map for recent check-ins. Even that kind of service is already available elsewhere.
There are ways to implement location-based dating without getting creepy -- namely, providing a layer of anonymity that can protect people from being spied on unless they explicitly allow access. That said, people who don't want to be tracked down shouldn't be checking in on Foursquare, and if they are, they should take some time to figure out the privacy settings.
Was Foursquare right to revoke API access to Girls Around Me? Will doing so actually improve awareness of online privacy concerns or prevent abuses?
Editor-at-very-large at Mobile Nations, gamer, giant.
Funny how everything was fine with Foursquare until someone showed them how one of their APIs could be used in other implications. All Foursquare is trying to do here is save a little face. Had the app been called People Around Me, all would have been OK. But this is how it usually is... everything is all kittens and puppies until a developer shows you how to use your system for evil things... then you wake up a little and make excuses the rest of the day like it's not your fault. If you ask me, this Russian dev should be credited with thinking out of the box and showing people how easy it is to use simple public information and access to it for evil things. After all, this is nothing more than what other systems like Intelius do for everyone who's ever had a published public record associated with them. They're all info farming sites that sell the info to anyone who wants it. It just so happens that Foursquare and Facebook do it for free and someone found a way to package it and present it to the creeps in a nice simple package.
And here I was looking forward to getting to try this app out this Friday night.
I'm not advocating violence or harrassment in any way, but I hope that some gils learned their leasson making everything they say and do public on facebook etc not taking into account that they are putting themselves in sleazy's way. I hope no one was hurt because of this but i just hope that some girls went home after and changed their privacy settings to friends only because when it's public u definitely get the WRONG attention.
Get the best of iMore in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to iMore. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.