Since this is all about video, please watch the video version to really see what it's all about.

iPhone 11 vs. Pixel 4: Main Video Cameras

The Pixel 4 can shoot up to 4K video at 30 fps.1080p video at 30, 60, or 120 fps. But no slow motion up to 240 fps. For that, you need to drop down to 720p. And… there are a couple other very obvious omissions here as well.

Pixel 4 shot by iPhone 11 in 4KSource: Rene Ritchie / iMorePixel 4 cameras shot by iPhone 11 in 4K 60fps.

First, there's 24 fps mode, not at any resolution. Now, 24 fps isn't science or anything like that. It's just tradition. Back in the day, movie makers found that anything less than 24 fps just didn't fool your brain into thinking it was seeing smooth, steady motion, and anything more was technologically and financially too expensive to justify. But, because most of us have grown up seeing cinema in 24 fps, our brains have come to identify that as looking cinematic. And 30 fps, well… more like TV.

So, even now, even in the age of ultra-high frame rates, people still want to shoot in 24 fps to capture that cinematic feel — the way I've always shot this channel, for example — and the Pixel 4 just won't do it. Sure, you can change it in post, but that's an extra step and an interpolation, which is never as good as just capturing it that way to begin with. Now, whether you personally care about that or not, let me know in the comments.

Save 40% and get three months of wireless service for just $45

Second is the lack of 4K 60fps. Yeah, the exact opposite problem. Videographers want 4K, because we either want to post video in 4K, or we want to be able to crop and move around, or render out extra crispy 1080p. We also want 60fps for either silky smooth motion, or to have extra frames so we can reduce it down in post and have extra silky smooth slow-motion b-roll.

And the Pixel 4, again, won't do it. In fact, Google lists 4K last on the Pixel 4 spec page. 1080 first, 720 second, and 4K dead last. Which is kind of a wicked obvious way to make it look like the exact opposite of a priority as well. And, for the company that also owns YouTube and hosts more 4K 60fps video than anyone else in the world, not being able to generate any of it themselves is… just… bizarre.

They've said stuff like they're still concentrating on 1080p since that's what most people use, or that 4K 60 is just too large for the storage.

But since the Pixel starts at $799 for 64 GB, and goes up to $899 for 128 GB, compared to the iPhone 11 that starts at $699 for 64Gb but only goes up to $749 for 128 GB, and also has an option for $256 GB for $849, something the Pixel 4 just doesn't offer at any price… that's a problem entirely of Google's own making.

Other Android phones, including Samsung, using the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset and universal flash storage, or UFS, 2.1, don't seem to have a problem doing 4K 60.

So, it sounds like Google just can't currently get their electronic image stabilization and image fusing HDR algorithms to handle 4K video streams at 60 fps, and they won't do it until they can. Which will require better silicon, better algorithms, or simply better willingness to get it done. I dunno.

The iPhone has been doing 4K 60 fps since the X in 2017. The XS in 2018 added interleaved extended dynamic range at 30 fps and now, the iPhone 11 in 2018, can do EDR at the full 60 fps, along with electronic stabilization.

I honestly think that comes down to the silicon difference and dedication of can-do vs. will-crush. Again, they may or may not matter to you, so let me know in the comments.

The iPhone 11 can also do 4K at 24 fps, but strangely not 1080p or 720p at 24 fps. Those are locked to 30 or 60 fps. Unless you're in low light, in which case they can be set to automatically drop to 24 fps for better capture quality.

The iPhone 11, like the XS, can also record stereo audio.

Slow-motion is 1080p 120 or 240 fps. No 720p slow-motion any more though, so you can't drop down if tiny file sizes are more important to you than higher video resolution.

But, all for $100 less for the 64 GB version than the Pixel 4, and $150 less than the 128 GB version. Even the 256 GB iPhone 11 is $50 less than the 128 GB Pixel 4.

And, if you want to spend the money, or you're a videographer billing it out to clients, you can go all the way up to the iPhone 11 Pro, and up to $512 GB… for $1349.

Both the Pixel 4 and the iPhone 11 can record in H.264 or H.265 for higher efficiency files… albeit ones older software may not play as nicely with.

It's also interesting that Google is willing to support H.265, or HEVC, for recording when they're not so willing, at all, for YouTube playback. For example, to allow for 4K playback on the Apple TV.

They probably just feel like they have more leverage with YouTube than they do with video editing software. Go figure.

Either way, both produce really good video. The iPhone 11 just gives you options Google won't or can't, at least for now.

iPhone 11 vs. Pixel 4: Secondary Cameras

Both Google and Apple made very different choices when it comes to the secondary cameras on the Pixel 4 and iPhone 11. Google opted for a telephoto, which plays to their strengths in computational zoom. Apple opted for an ultra wide-angle, which is quote-unquote more fun, but also lets you capture not just a more expansive frame, but an entirely different perspective. The 2016 iPhone 7 through 2018 iPhone XS all had secondary telephoto cameras, just like the Pixel 4 does now. And I liked and still like them a lot. If you have enough light, you can get a really nice natural depth of field off the camera.

iPhone 11 shot by Pixel 4 in 4K 30fpsSource: Rene Ritchie / iMoreiPhone 11 rear cameras shot by Pixel 4 in 4K 30fps.

I'm really enjoying the ultra wide-angle on the iPhone 11, though. Sure, some people will tell you you can just sneaker zoom in or out to get closer or wider shots. But you can't. Not really. Sometimes there are obstacles or hazards in the way. All times, the different cameras give you different looks. That's why different lenses exist, including and especially on higher-end cameras.

Which one is the better choice, telephoto or ultra wide-angle, will come down to personal preference. You can — and both cameras do, especially in low light — computationally emulate telephoto. You can't do that with ultra wide-angle because there's just no data for it. So, technically, the ultra wide-angle again gives you more options.

That includes capture outside frame, which lets Apple use data from the ultra-wide to better track and stabilize QuickVideo without having to crop in, for example. Also, to switch between beam-formed directed audio recording on wide and more ambient audio recording on the ultra-wide.

Having more options is what I really care about, so that's why my favorite here is the iPhone 11 Pro which, like many other Android cameras, gives you all three: wide, telephoto, and ultra-wide, so you don't have to choose. Drop a comment to let me know what options you care about.

Neither of them let you do portrait mode for video. Some other Android phones offer the option but it's not really ready for primetime yet.

With the iPhone, you can fake it by screen recording the live preview of Portrait mode on the still camera. Hat tip Austin Mann. Since the Pixel 4 still can't do live preview for Portrait Mode, you can't even fake it.

Either way, it's not great, and for actual video depth of field, that's where big lenses on dedicated cameras still win.

iPhone 11 vs. Pixel 4: Selfie Video Cameras

The Pixel 4 front-facing camera is 1080p, 30 fps. The iPhone 11 front-facing camera is 4K at 24, 30, or 60fps or 1080p at 30 or 60 fps. It can also do slow-motion at 1080p, 120 fps.Yeah, slofies.

Pixel 4 vs. iPhone 11 selfiesSource: Rene Ritchie / iMore

In other words, optically at least, the iPhone 11 can shoot higher-end video on its front, selfie camera than the Pixel 4 can on its main, rear camera.

Again, they both produce good video, but having options is better than not having options.

Conclusion

So, Pixel 4 vs. iPhone 11 video. For casual users, they're both great. Great color. Great stability. Neither does night mode for video yet but both use their image processors to get as much extended dynamic range as possible.

At the end of the day, though, Apple just offers more options for video. And that means, whether you're just shooting video of your kids or friends or pets and want them as future-proof as possible, or you're a professional and want to shoot, post, or just edit from 24 fps to 60 fps, the iPhone 11 is the one to get.

Apple's best

iPhone 11 Pro

A premium smartphone that's worth every penny.

Boring design aside, the iPhone 11 Pro is a marvelous phone that does just about everything right. It takes some of the best pictures out there, battery life is ridiculously good, and Apple's OLED display continues to impress. Add that together with speedy performance and all of the treats that come with iOS 13, and the 11 Pro more than justifies its steep price.

Google's best

Pixel 4 XL

Remarkable cameras meet disappointing battery life.

For the most part, the Pixel 4 XL stands out as one of the most appealing handsets in the Android space. Camera performance is next to magic, and the 90Hz display is a very welcome addition. Google's Motion Sense gestures and face unlock system also work way better than you might expect! All that goodness makes the disappointing battery life all the more irritating.

VECTOR | Rene Ritchie

Main

We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.