<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Week in Smartphone Schadenfreude, June 28th Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2008/06/28/this-week-in-smartphone-schadenfreude-june-28th-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/28/this-week-in-smartphone-schadenfreude-june-28th-edition/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/28/this-week-in-smartphone-schadenfreude-june-28th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-9148</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=2944#comment-9148</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Kevin: Thanks, though while I suppose they may think that makes sense from a marketing point of view, I&#039;m still not convinced RIM and Apple hit a huge overlap -- one&#039;s a business device that wants to be entertaining and the other is a consumer device that wants to be taken seriously. I&#039;m sure both would fly off the shelves, and could be marketed without any impact -- or could even get some faux rivalry going on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unless, of course, it&#039;s part of RIM&#039;s plan that everyone who can&#039;t grok a virtual keyboard brings the iPhone back in time for the Bold launch...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Evil!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin: Thanks, though while I suppose they may think that makes sense from a marketing point of view, I&#8217;m still not convinced RIM and Apple hit a huge overlap &#8212; one&#8217;s a business device that wants to be entertaining and the other is a consumer device that wants to be taken seriously. I&#8217;m sure both would fly off the shelves, and could be marketed without any impact &#8212; or could even get some faux rivalry going on.</p>

<p>Unless, of course, it&#8217;s part of RIM&#8217;s plan that everyone who can&#8217;t grok a virtual keyboard brings the iPhone back in time for the Bold launch&#8230;</p>

<p>Evil!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Michaluk</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/06/28/this-week-in-smartphone-schadenfreude-june-28th-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-9096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Michaluk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=2944#comment-9096</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: the Bold being pushed back on AT&amp;T. According to the RIM Investors call this week, coCEO said the Bold flew passed carrier testing with flying colors.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Real reason the Bold is getting pushed back on AT&amp;T? Well..seems they don&#039;t want two 3G phones hitting the market the same month. iPhone 3G gets the 11th. Bold will come in August. But the BOLD could be available on AT&amp;T in July...it just won&#039;t be.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the Bold being pushed back on AT&amp;T. According to the RIM Investors call this week, coCEO said the Bold flew passed carrier testing with flying colors.</p>

<p>Real reason the Bold is getting pushed back on AT&amp;T? Well..seems they don&#8217;t want two 3G phones hitting the market the same month. iPhone 3G gets the 11th. Bold will come in August. But the BOLD could be available on AT&amp;T in July&#8230;it just won&#8217;t be.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 11:17:10 -->
