Apple should make the iPad user-serviceable

Why the new iPad and iPad 2 are Apple's biggest design flaw in years

The new iPad and the iPad 2 are very simliar in form factor. They're actually almost impossible to tell apart from a the outside with the exception of a slight difference in thickness. That's disappointing, because I was really hoping Apple would change the way the new iPad was constructed and make it more user-serviceable.

While the new iPad and iPad 2 are beautiful devices to look at and hold in your hand, the overall design is terrible from a service perspective. iFixIt recently tore the new iPad down and went on to share a lot of the same sentiments I do about the overall design.

As our video guide guru MJ points out in her video below, not only can we hold Apple to a higher standard than other manufacturers, we must. If Apple ships one million iPads today, at 1.44 pounds each, that means 650 metric tons of unrepairable toxic iPad going out just today. And Apple’s the most valuable company in the world. Their stock hit $600/share yesterday. They’re recognized as leaders in the design and business worlds.

If Apple is going to be at the head of the pack, we must ask them to lead responsibly. And in electronics, leading responsibly means that your devices must be sustainably made and designed to last. Designed for use. Designed for repair. Designed for a more sustainable future.

When it was suspected that the new iPad would be a bit thicker than its predecessor, I was secretly hoping that Apple would be going back to using clips to hold in the screen like the original iPad instead of adhesive. Alas, that was not the case and Apple decided to stick with the same horrid adhesive they used on the iPad 2.

Now this would be fine if there were a way to gain access to the device from the rear. But there isn't. The only way to access internals on an iPad 2 or new iPad is to physically melt the adhesive around the edges of the screen. Yes, I said melt. This makes it a nightmare for anyone who wants to DIY repair anything other than a broken screen. Actually, replacing a newer iPad screen is a terrible experience in itself and way beyond what most would be willing to take on.

I've gotten several emails from readers asking for directions on how to repair their iPads, the same way I've shown how to repair iPhones. I've been hesitant to even offer advice as the process is so tedious and way beyond what even a skilled user should attempt on their own. The screen is damn near impossible to get off without breaking it. This is why I dread the day when the iPad 2 starts coming out of warranty all at once and I start getting calls for battery replacements, bad home buttons, and anything other than a cracked screen.

For those of you wondering what goes into replacing an iPad 2 front assembly- here's a quick run down.

Repairing a new iPad or iPad 2 is almost impossible and messy

First you'll have to take a heat gun to the edges of the screen and get the adhesive running around the edges soft enough to be able to fit a putty knife underneath an edge. Next you slowly heat small section by small section sliding your putty knife around the edges to free the glass front from the adhesive.

Adhesive around the digitizer and LCD make it extremely hard to get the screen off an iPad 2

Apple also decided to put a devilish type of foam adhesive on the frame of the LCD which you'll have to break too. You'll have to do this without inserting your putty knife too far as you can easily scratch or ruin the LCD completely if your putty knife comes in contact with it.

While working your way around the edges you'll need to be careful not to damage the Wi-Fi antenna which sits to the right side of the home button and can be ripped right out of its home easily if you pull up even the slightest bit too hard. This is because it will stick to the adhesive and come right out with the screen. This is why I stay away from using large suctions cups on iPads as there are just too many delicate internals that will get stuck to the adhesive.

New iPad and iPad 2 3G and 4G antenna

Just like the wifi antenna, the 3G/4G antennas can easily stick to the screen adhesive as well in the top middle portion of the iPad. You have to take great caution to melt the adhesive completely so it doesn't come up with the digitizer.

Once you've finally gotten all the adhesive broken, you'll be able to remove the front assembly, hopefully still in once piece. And when putting on a new piece of glass you'll need to make sure every single shred of glass or old adhesive is completely picked out of the frame before placing in a new one. If you don't, it won't sit flush and you'll have terrible light leak. If the frame was bent, you'll either need to replace that too or dremel it down. Not. Fun.

Removing the digitizer for an iPad 2

The worst part of all this is the tiny shards of glass that you'll more than likely end up picking out of the frame. I've had more than one client attempt a screen replacement on their own. Only one has succeeded and more importantly, another actually hurt themselves pretty badly when a piece of glass broke off in his hand.

This is not taking into account the other small cables and odds and ends you can easily tear or rip if you move too quickly. I've been guilty of sticking a putty knife just a bit too far under too quickly and cutting a cable. Then you've got that to replace as well.

I understand Apple wants to keep these as sealed appliances, as magical boxes that, if they break, you simply bring them back to Apple and either swap them for, or pay for, a replacement.

But what happens to your old device?

It gets ripped apart and a many of the internals may never be used again. A few components may get re-used but for the most part, it's garbage. The same thing goes for iPhones and iPods which are actually fairly easy to repair. I can probably swap four to five iPhone 4 or 4S screens in the time it takes me to fix one iPad 2.

The sad part is most of the phones that go into Apple and get swapped for new ones probably could have been fixed and given back to the customer in less than 30 minutes time. To my knowledge the only thing Apple employees are even trained to replace is the back cover, rear-facing camera, and vibrator assembly on the GSM iPhone 4 and the front assembly of an iPhone 3GS. Anything else just gets swapped and that's a shame. It's prioritizing packaging over everything else. It's too much.

Users have been fixing their own gadgets for years -- whether it's a phone, tablet, or a computer. Apple's recent design practices are making it economically unrealistic for businesses like myself to even bother with devices such as the iPad 2 or new iPad. The process is time consuming and has a very high margin for error. The front assembly isn't a cheap part and it's extremely difficult to remove it without breaking it or scratching the paint around the edges.

iFixIt is dead on in asserting that Apple should be responsible for making sure their devices are not only sustainable but repairable.

I fear what the next iteration of iPhone is going to bring with it and surely hope that Apple seriously evaluates their current design process and changes some things.

Not only because it would hurt me but because it hurts my clients. Some of them just don't have the money to walk into an Apple store and drop another $200 or more on a brand new replacement device. But they can afford to buy a part and swap it themselves or pay me a more reasonable amount to fix a shattered screen, broken home button, or replace a battery. They walk out happy and the odds of them purchasing another Apple device is more likely. They have the security that if an accident does happen, they have a safety net -- either their own repair skills or businesses like my own.

Apple offers certified repair for computers, why not mobile and tablet devices? Isn't that a better option than tossing devices that are perfectly salvageable? Apple retains a happy customer and it's better for the environment.

iFixit gave the new iPad a 2 out of 10 on their repairability scale. One of their lowest scores ever. They also lowered the iPad 2 repairability score down from a 4 to a 2 as well. I stand behind their scores completely. These devices are extremely hard to repair. I'm convinced that Apple can find a different practice of securing the screen without sacrificing size or thickness and would allow easier access to the internal components.

Sure consumers can buy services like AppleCare+ to avoid unfortunate accidents and save themselves some money but that only lasts for 2 years and after that customers are left with no options but to buy new devices, which they can't always afford.

Apple, please consider how these practices impact your consumers, other businesses, and the environment. You're selling millions and millions of iPads yet you continue to make them almost unserviceable even by your own stores. Creating a product made mainly of glass that's next to unrepairable is not responsible, it's form over function. You now set the standard in mobile. It's time for you to re-evaluate those standards and prioritize not only beautiful looking, excellent working devices, but easy to repair and maintain ones as well.

Response to: iFixit

(Note: This is part of an ongoing point/counterpoint series at iMore, where different writers with different opinions make their arguments. We'll post and link to an alternate point of view in the near future.)

Allyson Kazmucha

Help and how to editor for iMore. I can take apart an iPhone in less than 6 minutes. I also like coffee and Harry Potter more than anyone really should.

More Posts

 

3
loading...
0
loading...
120
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Apple announces early morning con-call tomorrow, March 19, to discuss cash balance

Next up →

iMore Picks of the Week for March 18, 2012

There are 73 comments. Add yours.

big9erfan says:

While it wold be great if Apple did that, it's never going to happen. Devices like the iPhone and iPad were NEVER designed to be "user servicable". It's a device for the "masses" not a device for the tinker-ers. Think back to the original Macs, they were designed not to be opened and modified, just a sealed box. That design methodology continues with the iPhone & iPad and I believe it will continue to be so with future versions of these devices.

dan says:

i couldn't disagree more. one reason these devices are so great is their sleek, beautiful design. making them user-serviceable isnt merely a matter of adding some screws. the entire design would be compromised in many ways because in order to have doors or screw holes, you have to add more hardware to the devices.
by eliminating them, apple is able to use that space far, ar more efficiently -- for things like bigger batteries and more chips that perform more functions. not to mention aesthetic beauty, which is also important.
what you're asking for would ABSOLUTELY:

  • make the devices larger
  • make the batteries smaller
  • make the devices uglier

apple's the largest company in the world because they've been doing a few things right. there's no obligation to make life easier for people who run 3rd-party businesses. with all due respect, this notion of user-serviceability is a perfect example of outdated, old-fashioned thinking. fortunately for all of us, apple is about innovation. otherwise, we'd still have floppy drives and serial ports on our computers. :-)

Allyson Kazmucha says:

So basically, innovation trumps the environment and what Apple and other companies do with parts that are tossed?
Not a valid argument in my book. Apple vouches to be such a green company but yet they discard and toss out devices that could have been easily serviced.

Doctor says:

So, ultimately, the issue isn't whether iPads are fixable, the issue is in Apple's processing (or non-processing) of recycled components. What it sounds like is that someone at iMore needs to do an investigative report of how much Apple actually recycles. Apple sells itself as environmentallty friendly, and you are clearly saying that they are not and that you have valid sources that can prove it.
THAT is a story.
If iMore is unable to follow up on that story because if the risk of a relationship with Apple (as was stated by the WSJ about the NYT after the Foxconn story), give Mike Daisey a call. He needs something else to take the heat off him for a while--and maybe some more monologue material.

zato says:

"So basically, innovation trumps the environment and what Apple and other companies do with parts that are tossed?
Not a valid argument in my book. Apple vouches to be such a green company but yet they discard and toss out devices that could have been easily serviced."
"but yet they discard and toss out devices that could have been easily serviced.??
Where do you get this from. How do you know what they throw out and what they recycle.
When you say BS like the above, you prove to me that you are an anti-Apple propagandist.

hey says:

Please close your mouth you tree hugging b**ch.

Sean says:

One, we don't know any of what you assert. We don't actually know that for Apple to make its products more recyclable/serviceable would instantly create a product that is no longer sleek and aesthetically attractive.
Two, even if it were, isn't that the whole point of a company that bills itself as the pinnacle of innovative design? It's their challenge to design a product that meets their aesthetic goals as well as the sustainability goals of their customers.
Anyone could design a sealed case that contains a bunch of electronic components that meed our expectations. A real innovative designer would do all that and design for end-of-life as well.

Rrash says:

Yeah, that's why my MacBook Pro has screws all over the bottom, enabling me to max out the memory myself at a fraction of the AppleTax price.
Larger? Nope.
Smaller components? Huh?
Ugly? No way
It would not take much to change the case to use screws, and no need to enbiggen the device in the process. Try harder to be cromulent, Bub.

Dan says:

I agree leave the design as it is, it makes me be extra careful of not putting the pad in danger of damage, accidents do happen insurance is the next port of call. My house contents covers it so no extra expense required

jenn says:

You really do have no concept what the iMore community wants. This may be the most silly article I've seen yet here.
We go from writing about how to do something as basic as sync contacts or edit a video to this, something no one gives a crap about. Seriously? Make the ipad easier to repair? It doesn't get any easier to go to an apple store and exchange it or pay 199 or less.
This is simply stupid.

hoonaynay says:

Jenn, sweetheart, did you leave your ignorant comment after reading the first paragraph and skipping the rest? I would say you did considering he touched on the "not always being able to afford the $200" point several times. Please gather all of the information instead of rushing and leaving an irrational and thoughtless comment.

Allyson Kazmucha says:

So is commenting on an article you obviously did not read or care to take the time to actually comprehend.

Carioca32 says:

Whoa, hold on there sis, who elected you to speak on behalf of the iMore community? I happen to agree with Allyson, and although I do pick on Rene from time to time I do consider myself part of the iMore community.

Guest says:

If the first three comments are any indication, "what the iMore community wants" is the sort of entitled, selfish, disposable-plastic-cup attitude that has caused so much trouble in the world. You do not have to be a tree hugging hippie to realize that a daily dump of 650 metric tons of un-reusable materials -- not including the materials used in construction -- is not in anybody's long term interest. So you do not want to dig around in your ipad. You know what? Neither do I. But if those who do -- including, at scale, large companies, third party repair shops, or even local Apple stores, could repurpose parts to extend the life of their components, it would go one hell of a long way towards reducing that number. Yes, Apple is one company, but at their scale, they are in a unique position to have an impact. But they explicitly choose not to, and you cheer them on.
But I guess the 'iMore community" would rather make sure they can have newer, shinier plastic at all costs, and to hell with everybody else. Thinking about anything other than one's personal gratification is so "old-fashioned."

Pharrett says:

Wait...
So you're telling me that if my iPad breaks, and I take it to Apple, and I get a new one, they just throw the old one away? Because that's what this is sounding like to me.
If it all goes in the garbage, as stated in the article, then why are there refurbished iPads, iPhones, etc for sale on Apple's website?

Scott says:

Refurbished iPads are probably just the ones where the spouse said no, and they had to bring it back. A quick polish, back in the box and sell it as a refurb. If they are this difficult to service, they would not waste their time on much more than that. The other products are different - they are serviceable, so they get new batteries, new glass, etc.

Scott says:

Just took a look at the Apple Canada site - no refurbished iPad2 units, just first generation - presumably because the first generation are easier/more cost effective to refurbish, so more are available.

Allyson Kazmucha says:

From my understanding which comes from people that have or do work for Apple and from what most companies do with defective units - Apple re-uses some internal components and may melt down certain components but also trashes quite a few components too.
My guess is refurbished iPads are probably ones that have a part or two that is re-used. The entire outside casing, glass, and many internals are brand new.

entwined82 says:

Not to be a jerk but if Apple's business practices make your business fail that isn't their problem. I used to work for a company that sold aftermarket products for video game systems to allow the use of pirated software. After a raid pushed by Nintendo and Sony, we went legit. Game accessories, cases, etc..we evolved to fit a changing landscape. I know it isn't easy to do and it sucks but that's how it goes sometimes.
I understand your point and I do wish this stuff was as user-repairable as the old video ipods or ipod minis were..but in the end it isn't Apple's responsibility to do anything beyond help their bottom line, sadly. Apple has been form over function for some time now, overheating MBP's, iphones that are 95% glass, etc..Vote with your wallet, stop supporting this company. You knew how the ipad 2 was. Did you think the new ipad would be any different?

Allyson Kazmucha says:

My view point has nothing to do with my business being sustainable. I could be without supporting iPads - that's not the point. It's "how" Apple is handling repairs - which you can't even call it that. They swap out devices and junk 90% of a perfectly salvageable device.
Their practice of making them next to unserviceable even to their own employees isn't excusable anymore.

Doctor says:

I wouldn't say this is a "stupid" or "junk" article, but I simply don't agree with the expressed opinion.
Specifically, I was stunned when Ms. Kazmucha quoted (and agreed with) iFixIt:
"If Apple ships one million iPads today, at 1.44 pounds each, that means 650 metric tons of unrepairable toxic iPad going out just today."
Apple has made it clear that they make iPads, iPhones, and MacBooks primarily out of materials that can be recycled (http://www.apple.com/environment/), and they offer a recycling service PLUS a discount for new Apple products (http://www.apple.com/recycling/). Apple clearly doesn't want 650 metric tons of "toxic iPad" going anywhere.
At the same time, it needs to be noted that iFixIt and Ms. Kazmucha make a living fixing iDevices and teaching others to do so (Ms. Kazmucha discusses this in the article). It seems reasonable to me that a company that tried to keep developers from jail breaking its operating system would want to keep hardware specialists out of their devices.
Personally, I think there is a silver lining here. If repair specialists can figure out how to repair iPads for less than the cost of a Apple-provided repair, consumers will use their services. That means more income for the repair specialist, and an entire new market is sustained.

Rene Ritchie says:

Just to be clear, I added the quote to the article. Ally referenced it, but I thought it would be better for the reader if they could see what she was referencing.
We're going to present a counter editorial as well, just like we did with the Chinese factories, and with the "new iPad" name. Debate leads to thought which leads to better thinking.
Even and especially when I have a different opinion, what value is that opinion if I haven't tested it against alternatives?

9thwonder says:

Don't hold your breath because most users do not want to service their own devices any more then they want to change their own oil. They want it to not break in the first place, if it does break to have a good warranty, to be quickly repaired at no cost or at worst a reasonable cost.
I've repaired pcs, i need to replace a headphone jack on an ipod video, i've built and repaired a guitar, i'm relatively open to fixing things. I even did my own plumbing and for a time installed my own car stereos. but most of the time its' much easier to have someone else do it and have them stand by it. i wouldn't hold my breath on this one.

9thwonder says:

Regarding the design of both the ipad and iphone:
Don't change for the sake of changing. If it isn't broke don't try to fix it. The ipad design and look isn't broke.

Scott says:

Wow - I am surprised at all the negativity here. After a slew of How To articles that are basically re-hashes from iPad, iPad2, iPhoneX, articles (or certainly could have been) I found it refreshing to read the details of just how unserviceable iPads are.
If Apple can come up with a design like the iPhone 4 and make it easily serviceable, then there is no reason they can't do the same with an iPad. Even Steve Jobs stressed that beautiful design shouldn't just end with what the user can see - the inside should be well designed as well.
As for those claiming this doesn't add to the bottom line - BullSh1t - making the units easily serviceable means staff can save the company money by not simply swapping devices all the time. If they can do a 10-30 minute repair, that will still keep the customer happy and is a lot more cost effective than swapping out the device and junking the old one.
I really hope the iMore community is not so named because they think about I more and about We less.

Watcher says:

AWESOME comment, Scott!

OMFG says:

wtf enough with the iPad articles already!

Thorasgar says:

I for one want to make sure I maximize my investment. I would like to see an in depth post on what the best options are for a new iPad owner. Extended warranty options, sell after a year and buy a new one, what to expect the battery condition to be in.
This post has me very, very concerned. Is this really a disposable iPad? (no pun intended). Anyone who has young children in the house thinks about these things.

Winski says:

MANY years ago, mini-computer makers faced a dilemma in their service organizations. Continue to do component-level repair and spend truck-loads of cash stocking parts and training folks to do repair at the component level - a VERY high-level skill, in my opinion, but one that computer manufacturers decided they could no longer afford. That's when most of them went to SKU-level replacement... In the case of iPad, it's a SKU.. It breaks, for any reason, replace it... Too expensive to do anything else.
So Allison, absolutely no reflection on your skills or ambitions, but not Apple or any other computer / electronic builder are ever going back to component-level repair...

Allyson Kazmucha says:

I'm not asking Apple to do that on a large scale but let others. Make them accessible. I was speaking as a consumer, not a large company. Sure, maybe it's cheaper for "them" to replace a sku but it isn't cheaper for a consumer to pay for that sku. Make the iPads serviceable to repair companies and users have the "option" to either pay for a sku or choose a repair shop to service them.

Emeroid says:

I'm not sure about that. I think all in that big corps just pass the cost on. If it was designed to be more labour intensive the device, and the associated services, (App store, iTunes Store), would be more expensive and have more restrictive terms. They wouldn't just restrict the increased cost to the hardware, companies make you pay for things in ways you could never think of.
Although there is a waste element argue also there is no difference to any other industry. Your car is significantly harder to fix now than it once was, are ECUs not reated in the same way as iDevices when they go wrong?

frog says:

Was this meant for the Android part of MobileNations? Because it seems very out of place on TiPb

Watcher says:

Why? Because it's saying something negative about an Apple device. Gasp! Perish the thought!

Judhe says:

Though I am sympathetic to the question of how recyclable the iOS devices are after they are disposed of, and their environmental impact, and would be interested in more detail on that point, your request for more repairability has fallen on completely deaf ears. The tinkering days at Apple are long over, and the use of these devices is strictly as appliances that just work. People are very busy these days and their tolerances for DIY is very low, and would be surprised if it was more than 5% of the population that would ever have any interest in self repairing. I mean, that's one of the reasons that the Apple Stores have been expanded, to preclude costly and protracted service for both users and Apple, and I am so glad those days are over.

Allyson Kazmucha says:

I'm not suggesting users "take an interest in DIY". But I'll tell you this - companies like my own that offer those services in areas where there is no apple store within an hour's drive are appreciated in their communities. People would rather come to me at times even when they're "IN" warranty for a power button fix or something of the like because it's more convenient than driving to Apple or sending a device in. For most, it's convenience and yes, 3rd party repair shops still have a market for this kind of thing. My customers prove that to me every single day.

jamesj says:

I seriously doubt few if any with in-warranty idevices will go to a 3rd party repair shop.
Why would a sane person void the warranty by going to you - when they can get a new replacement within minutes at Apple's store.

Erick says:

I'm sorry but the thinking in this article and some of these comments is horribly flawed on many levels. I was a lead tech for Apple for a number of years, so let me enlighten you:

  1. Techs can service them - The techs at an Apple store are already completely overwhelmed. If they had to repair these devices as well, it would be 10 times worse. Folks suggestioning a 10-30 min repair have obviously never worked in this type of environment or on these types of products. We loved the fact iPods, iPhones, et al were swappable.
  2. "Junk the old ones" - this is completely false. We've never junked old iPods, iPhones or iPads. They all, even completely dead units get sent back to Apple. Units are then pulled apart and good parts are used in service parts that go back out as replacements. Parts that can't be are recycled. They do not just simply throw them away. From a "green" standpoint Apple does better with this program than any other competitor out there.
  3. "User repairable" - Kudos to the commenters who just tear into their gear and fix them. But let me tell you the flip side of that. Do you know how many customers I've watched bring their Mac in to the store, in pieces in a box? TOO MANY! Yes the trott on out to eBay thinking they've ordered the right part and rip their beloved Mac apart just to break it further or not know what to do. This would be a disaster and quite frankly you'd end up, truly, with landfills filled with iDevices.

You're welcome to your opinion....but I'm afraid it's both illadvised and illinformed.

Allyson Kazmucha says:

Techs can service them? Hmm, interesting because I've never seen an Apple employee service anything but the following -

  • iPhone 4 GSM - rear camera, back plate, vibrator assembly
  • iPhone 3GS - front assembly (and they swap out the LCD with the whole front assembly regardless whether it's bad or not even though it's a 6 screw different to remove it)

Interesting you say nothing is junked as I've heard the complete opposite from several Apple employees.
I'm almost positive apple does not re-use most materials. As a company grows and starts outputting devices in the massive amount apple is, practices have to change. Especially ones that involve disposing of a ton of materials that probably could have been easily refurbished or re-used.

frog says:

What next iMore, Apple should allow users to install Android on their iPads?

Ally Kazmucha says:

Nah. For that we would still say buy an android. I detest android themes even :p but I do like to fix my own devices when they break and we offer a service many people appreciate. Of course it's disheartening to see a company make a device unserviceable when a few design changes could save many of their loyal customers money.

Allyson Kazmucha says:

Instructions: please read an article before leaving a comment. I actually pretty clearly stated "why" people would want to do this. I guess the tons of hazardous material being dumped into the environment doesn't matter as long as you have a new iPad.
I was in no way suggesting anyone not comfortable opening a device should but that Apple put a better system in place when it comes to repairability.

Rob White says:

Keep your chin up Allyson. I read this article & took your meaning to be you expected apple to do better. As the market leader they claim to be, certainly they have the money, apple can do better in terms of environmental sustainability. But in imore land you get attacked for stating an opinion that differs from the readers.
Sorry it happened to you. It's happened to me plenty on here. I've come to expect it as normal. Just know there are those of us out here, who don't directly use apple products (my wife & 2 of children do however), that appreciate any efforts to get apple to take the lead in fixing problems they either contribute to our can have a positive impact on. So I appreciate the thought provoking reasoning behind your article.
On a side note;
I find it odd that Al Gore sits on apples board, & is a big share holder, yet they have questionable policies with environmental responsiblity. He is the champion of environmental issues isn't he? Food for thought.

jamesj says:

Did you not read the above comments asking you to support your allegations.
Yet you continue to allege that Apple is dumping toxic material into the environment.
Is this based on hearsay from some tech you personally interviewed? What level of tech are they? Are they privy to how Apple recycles its faulty devices?
You now sound like you object to how Apple implements its recycling program and only will accept it if Apple makes it easier for you to repair it.

Ally Kazmucha says:

Yes. I know how the apple system works. I believe I stated that apple DOES re-use certain parts but not others. And those "others" are typically perfectly fine. It's about making them sustainable and future proof. I never meant for it to turn into a "apple doesn't recycle" fight. If that's all you took from this, you've missed the point completely.

Allan Jensen says:

Good article and I hope Apple takes notice. I was devastated when my iphone 3gs fell out of a plastic bag and into the bottom of a canoo and the screen went dead. A youtube video taught me how surprisingly easy it was to open. I couldn't fix it but I made sure it was dried up and an aftermarket repairshop saved me several hundred bucks; still works fantastically well. That gave me hope when my ipad 1 screen acted up after a small drop. Repairshops suggested 200+ dollars but in the end it was a case of opening up and reinserting a loose plug. These DIY videos and local repairshops have thus far saved me at least 500 bucks and I for one resent if Apple have made the newer devices harder to fix, as ipad 1 was hairy enough for me to deal with. I don't want to waste money, nor discard 1-2 year old products when the slightest problem arises.

O'poel says:

I agree, I my self from development country where as I know there is not even one apple store (if exist i believe it hard to find), so if some folk in my country who have idevice need to repair then the best solution they could effort is:
1. go to repairshops
2. self repair
3. ...
10. send to apple store.

Brian says:

Someone was dreaming.
When have you ever seen a Apple product that was user serviceable. They build them so that only tech's that are trained can service them.
Their products are not likes PC's. Their built with that in mind.

Ally Kazmucha says:

Did you read the article? Even their techs can't service them.

sting7k says:

I agree on all counts. But I wouldn't wait around for it to happen.
I imagine all the broken ones they take in get stripped for parts and good parts are reassembled into factory refurbished units and sold at discount.

RMCSteve says:

Not sure exactly what the issue is here? Is it about how recyclable that i-devices are, or how serviceable they are? Those are, and should always be, two separate issues. Roughly 80-90% of an iPad by mass for example, is essentially aluminum, glass, and a Li-ion battery, all three of which are recyclable, with glass and aluminum being easy to reuse at low-cost.
So what's the problem there?
Not serviceable enough for the average consumer? Ally, you know full well the general public has no interest in fixing electronics. That's evidenced by the fact that even on phone models with replaceable batteries, many will replace the phone instead of the battery, which is the reason I'm willing to bet as to why Apple has not gone that route.
If Apple is indeed not recycling as they say, then that is the real story you should be covering, not this article which I perceive to be a thinly veiled plea for Apple to make their devices easier for you to fix, thus allowing you to grow your business by servicing more devices.

jamesj says:

I agree, its 2 different issues but cleverly linked together with emotive words like 'junk' to sway opinions; sadly for their self-interest.

Neal Campbell says:

I wouldn't be an Apple customer if they made products user serviceable. Look at the back of a product that can be easily serviced. You see screws and seams and a whole lot of ugly. If you aren't happy with the way Apple makes our gadgets, buy something else. As an Apple customer, I've feel really good that Jony Ivy isn't moved by this kind of thinking.

Icebox says:

Screws can be hidden. Is the iPhone 4 ugly because it has --gasp -- TWO screws marring its bottom? Why would an iPad be ugly if it had screws next to its port like the phone?

Doctor says:

The problem with your analogy is that Apple changed the design of the screws away from a standard phillips head to a pentalobe screw. Yes, a person who specializes in the repair of iDevices is going to have purchased one of those pentalobe screwdrivers, but the average Apple user does not own that tool.
Thus you return to the concept of the post: the device being "repairable by user." The pentalobe screw should be evidence enough for everyone that Apple doesn't want that!

fjpoblam says:

The April 2008 green issue of PC Magazine says, "A pile of our obsolete computers could make a 22-story mountain that covers the entire 472 square miles of the city of Los Angeles." I suspect, with iPads and iPhones, the growth rate of that mountain has been dramatic.

Pete Austin says:

Re: "If Apple ships one million iPads today, at 1.44 pounds each, that means 650 metric tons of unrepairable toxic iPad going out just today".
That means the iPad is 100% made up of toxic components. (Google for: 1440000 pounds in metric tonnes to check)
I don't believe it. Let's see the evidence. iPads are happily used my millions of children, whose lives are in danger if you are right.
If you have no evidence, please do the same as the people who stupidly believed Mike Daisey's lies without proper fact checking and publish a retraction.http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/ieconomy/acclaimed-apple-critic-m...

Colauhu says:

OH...MY...GOSH. I am so tired of these rediculous environmentalism rants about Apple. Then don't buy the damn thing. Don't buy any PC/tablet/phone/lightbulb/car, etc. Just because it is not user serviceable doesn't mean it can't be recycled when the time comes. As for Al Gore, he's a hypocrite. Always has been. He proved what a blowhole and moron he is already on the whole anthropogenic global warming issue. He's nothing more than one of the multi-millionaire that wants to make more money that your kind seem to despise so much.

Skywalker says:

A statement by any single person or writer, especially from outside the company or a non-auditor, is not proof. The responsibility is on the writer to vet their articles and statements. Simply suggesting that parts are tossed or thrown away because from the front of the Apple counter they simply swap things out for does not mean it is actually thrown out. It's just that you haven't seen or know what's truly going on back there. Perception can be a true evil sometimes. Mind you that what you are suggesting could be completely true in fact but until vetted, all bets are off. What proof have you identified that Apple has a negative impact on the environment besides the use of your perception?

Turt99 says:

In the comments Allyson continues to repeat over and over that when an iPad is swapped the old one is trashed. This is likely the case but as others have mentioned we don't know this for a fact, and repeating it over and over does not make it true either.
Making the iPad user repairable is not going to help apple. when I purchased my iPad I didn't once think about how would I repair it. I purchased it because I know Apple will help if I have an issue, and my experience with Apple is that things just work the way they should.
Now if the item was serviceable like you mention the phones are a 10 min swap will be preferred over a 30 min repair. Why? they want to make the customer the happiest they can, they get the customer back out the door grinning from ear to ear and the customer will tell their friends about the service they received. They wont say "I had to wait 45 min for them to repair my beat up iPhone" they will say "Awesome, I got a shiny new device and I'm in love again"
I would also suggest that even when devices are repairable the same practice of only using certain parts in refurbs would be used, I would not want a refurb full of scratches and since a lot of what makes Apple stand out is the looks, they will do what they have to to make sure even the refurb customers are happy.

Icebox says:

The real problem with making the devices not only not user serviceable but also economically unserviceable by professionals, is that this creates a monopoly for servicing in apple's hands. Monopolies always result in higher prices.
Of course, apple's repair service is a beautiful example of industrial design, I mean if you could see the techs at work it would be thing of unimaginable beauty! And apple is a unique company that certainly wouldn't act like every other monopolist in the history of business, so we can ignore all that history as old-fashioned thinking.

Ric says:

Hahahahahahahahahah this is the funniest thing I have seen all day. User serviceable indeed. Your kidding right? Apple has zero intention toward making things approachable for free.
You need to pay to get it, pay to use it, pay to fix it and pay to break it! The sooner you realize that Apple is trying to find a way to suck the blood directly from your veins, you may want to rethink what the 'real' value is that they bring to your life and at what cost.

MayhemMaybe says:

I wholly agree with this article and though I do own an iPad2, I hate that since the early iPods Apple seems to be at war with its consumer both from the internal software standpoint by not allowing you to do what you want with the device with their war on jail breaking, but their war on the consumer in the hardware.
Why should an iPad2 no longer be useful to the consumer when its battery no longer holds a charge? Yes, its unlikely any of us have reached this point yet even if owning an original iPad and some won't reach it ever if they subscribe to the rampant consumerism of running to Apple every year to get the new model. Some may even say that when the battery does fail (and they all will) that the iPad, iPod or iPhone is now so old as to no longer be useful.
Why? The iPad will be no less useful than when the consumer bought it if it still gets their email, can still surf the sites they need, and they can still read their books on it if that is all they need and want it for. So why, because of a design decision by Apple, should this device be relegated to a scrap heap simply because they chose not to make the battery able to be replaced without breaking the screen?
It may only be $200 two years out to replace. but what about three years, four years. five? Are we so toss away that some of us won't consider that a device that 'old' is still useful and now would likely be a $500 or $600 replacement with the original chucked in the pail and dragged out to the curb?
This day and age there is simply no excuse in my mind for a company to make a battery not easily replaceable. HP had an elegant design in the Pre 3 phone and the battery is easy to get to making the devices useful life expanded well beyond iPhone4 and Motorola Droid Razr phones.
What is also left out here is the over packaging of the devices themselves (over packaging that is doubled when you consider that each time you have a failure in one you have to return it to get a replacement. Unpacking a MacBook Pro leaves a huge amount of paper, cardboard and plastic in the bin. Even the Magic mouse is way over packaged in hard plastic case for a simple, slim mouse. Thick boxes, plastic protection wrapping even the power plug (does the power adapter need to be shiny plastic if we have to protect it with plastic in the box to keep it from being scratched and adding to the waste, is a question not just Apple but also Blackberry and every other manufacturer should be asking), all kinds of compartments in the box, all adding to the throw away for each iPod, iPhone and iPad purchased or obtained as a replacement due to a simple part that could have been repaired all add to the piles our children's children will have to live next to.
Lack of replaceable battery is a reason I don't own an iPhone and my iPod is a Third Gen original (not a touch) which I have opened and replaced the battery myself for $7.00 instead of $70 that Apple wanted to do it.
Apple has a vested interested in making things you have to replace every few years or even sooner when they break or have a battery go bad thus increasing their sales nd stock price so it is up to consumers to get them to change. They will not on their own. America is supposed to be a progressive nation. We used to have lead in paint and saw it was bad, so we discontinued its use. We should be looking at these things no different.

jamesj says:

FYI, Apple has a 'Battery Replacement Service' for $99.
I'd rather go to Apple and be assured of a new + original battery that won't explode or leak on me.

Allan Jensen says:

I had to get very specific instructions to find the screws before I ever realized there were readily accessible screws on my iphone 3gs. Fantastic design and Jony Ive is very capable of designing a sleek device that is serviceable without more than 1% of really adamant users ever realizing it is actually possible to open the device.
Mindboggling the amount of venom users pour out here, in disgust over other users actually wishing to be able to service their device. Do you believe it is any less magical because it can be serviced? Somehow I suspect that's the case and you don't want your bubble burst. Be real! Whether it's good for the environment or just plain old good for your pocketbook, please don't stand in the way of the sensible plea that Allyson makes to Apple.

Ally Kazmucha says:

Interesting? More like ignorant. No offense. So people are to upgrade to pay for Apple's R&D? And users are to pay the price? I especially love the part where they call non-user serviceable consumer friendly. All you have to do is read the comments on that article to see how biased and uninformed it is.
As a side note, many users have stated that I have a self interest because I repair devices. Then it's worth stating we repair more than just apple devices. We also provide other services such as web development and business consulting (these are actually where most of our money comes from). I could never touch another iPad and my business would be next to not affected in the slightest. We have been open for about a year and we have serviced hundreds of phones. We have serviced about 15 iPads. I choose not to service them because they aren't worth the time or money. I'd rather focus on other repairs that net far more money. But it is something my customers appreciate us offering. And my main goal is to offer them useful services.

free ipad 2 no offers or surveys says:

I use Friendcaster since it's got an amazing interface for albums and it's 100 % free with not full versions.

Valery Mojarro says:

God my iPod Touch from NorthPark center in Dallas Friday morning.

Vernita Pigford says:

What fun! Makes me almost glad I don't have an iPod.

Sharri Pinette says:

Nice post. I was checking continuously this site and I'm impressed! Extremely useful info specifically the last part I care for such info much. I was looking for this particular information for a long time. Thanks and best of luck.

iwa says:

Seems true, that Apple products is not repairable and only depend on guarantee, and they will replace with a new one, out of guarantee, the service center will say beyond repair, and advise to buy a new one.
If we know this, please decide whether you want to stick with Apple or buy others brand.