How to

How to re-download movies, music, and TV shows to your Mac or PC with iTunes in the Cloud

How to

How to re-download previously purchased apps and games on iPhone and iPad


iTunes 11.3 gives your movies all-new, all-streaming iTunes Extras

How to

How to re-download purchased music, movies, and TV shows with iTunes in the Cloud

How to

How to change the iTunes account on your iPhone or iPad

How to

How to enable automatic downloads for music, books, and apps with iTunes in the Cloud


Please do this before you upgrade to iOS 7.1.2!

Movies & TV

Happy 10th birthday British (and French and German) iTunes Store!


iTunes Store, App Store, Apple TV experiencing server problems, don't panic

How to

How to create an Apple ID on your iPhone or iPad


Apple releases iTunes 11.2.2 with a fix for unexpected downloads

Movies & TV

X-Men: Days of Future Past is in theaters now — Here's how to catch up on iTunes!


Apple releases iTunes 11.2.1, fixes hidden /Users directory bug


iTunes 11.2 update focuses on podcast improvements

How to

iTunes Match Limit: What to do when you hit 25,000 songs

Movies & TV

24: Live Another Day starts tonight, relive Jack Bauer's worst days on iTunes now!

Movies & TV

Star Wars Episode VII cast announced, but I still can't watch the originals on iPhone, iPad, or Apple TV?

Movies & TV

Record labels reportedly underwhelmed by iTunes Radio, want more change from Apple

How to

How to disable Touch ID for iTunes and App Store purchases

Movies & TV

iTunes Store for Android reportedly considered by Apple

Shock! Disbelief! Week 4: Big Music Price Hike STILL Makes Tunes Less Popular!

iPhone vs. Big Media

We posted last month about how initial reports showed the then new $1.29 price point Big Music had convinced iTunes, Amazon, and other digital music retailers to adopt had caused pricier tunes to fall down the charts, how do things look now, some 4 weeks later?

The same if not worse-ish, according to the Register:

Billboard notes that after four weeks, both $1.29 and $0.99 songs have, as expected, experienced a decline in revenue, down 34.5 per cent and 29 per cent. But since $1.29 songs have a higher margin, the hike has raised more income than if the price had remained at 99 cents. How much? Billboard reckons $14,000 a week net. DMN confirms the trend but wonders if the net effect isn't negative overall.

Has the long-tail truly come off the online music business? Will the record labels continue to try and squeeze more and more out of the bestselling hits? Do we care? I know I barely thought twice about hitting the buy-button on $0.99 DRM-free, 256-bit iTunes music. At $1.29, however, psychological barrier or not, I think more than twice.

Maybe Steve Jobs was right?

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, Review, The TV Show, Vector, ZEN & TECH, and MacBreak Weekly podcasts. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

More Posts



← Previously

TiPb Birthday Bash! Win an Unlocked ColorWare iPhone 3G!

Next up →

Phone different Podcast Episode 38

There are 13 comments. Add yours.

Tweger says:

You misspelled "price" in the title.

Linde says:

I know that there have been at least 3 popular songs that I haven't paid $1.29 for. I know it is silly because it is only .30, but I just can't do it...

Forrest Gump says:

I use limewire now. Has anyone seen Jen-nay?

Jellotime91 says:

For some reason I can NOT bring myself to buy a song that's priced at $1.29... I will download it on for free and fix the tags myself before I pay $1.29 for it on iTunes.

Snowman81 says:

I know it's only .30c extra, but its the principle of just feels like a money grab so I don't buy them. Still a lot of the time I buy the physical CD with little regard for how much less or more I'm paying vs getting them on what the hell do I know.

sting7k says:

I don't really get why 99 cent songs saw the decline. I know many people who have jumped into buying from iTunes only now that it is DRM free.
I'm having a hard time finding those 69 cent songs though.

Matt Sawyers says:

I must say, I don't buy my music through iTunes anymore. I am not sure why, but the $0.29 price hike has made me think differently. Now I stick to free music & radio show podcasts, like Above & Beyond and TWIT.

frog says:

We saw a $0.60 price hike here, I've not bought any of the more expensive songs - and don't plan to. It makes the "free" alternatives more attractive.

Ana says:

@Forrest Gump
ick don't use Limewire.
Find a reputable BitTorrent site ;) A+ quality and you're almost guaranteed to find some unreleased/rare tracks by your favorite artist

Pinny says:

Anyone who took even a basic microeconomics course knows that wants (as opposed to needs) usually have a fairly elastic demand curve. In English, demand is fairly sensitive to price. Economic theory would predict then, that a lower price would maximize profit. Indeed this is easy to illustrate: 1000 songs at .99 = $990, whereas 600 songs at 1.29 = $774, or a net loss. This price sensitivity is especially true in a recession. Makes you wonder what the heck Big Music was thinking. If anything, they should have lowered prices. ie: 1200 songs @ .89 = $1068 Do they not have any economists on staff?

Rene Ritchie says:

@Pinny: hasn't big music, indeed all of big media, proven over and over again that they have no concept of economics other than cut-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face curves?

Andy says:

@Pinny -- You tell them, mr. microeconmics. Let's talk about profit margins. Hm...Apple doesn't make $0.99 for a song, because their profit margin was around 30% at $0.99, meaning their cost per song is around 70 cents.
(.99 - .70) * 1000 = $290
(1.29 - .70) * 600 = $354
An that's at 60% sales, not 65% as the article mentions.
I assure you, with $29 billion in cash on hand, Apple knows something about economics. Or do you think they just won a $100 million lottery...290 times!!!?
Of course, you would have known this, if you had actually read the article.
"But since $1.29 songs have a higher margin, the hike has raised more income than if the price had remained at 99 cents. How much? Billboard reckons $14,000 a week net."