<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iMore &#187; google google voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/tag/google-google-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T Strikes Back: Asks FCC to Investigate Google Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/25/att-strikes-asks-fcc-investigate-google-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/25/att-strikes-asks-fcc-investigate-google-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google google voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=12341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2009/08/google_voice_jawa.jpg"></a>

<a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/att/">AT&#38;T</a>, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125390758982041819.html">WSJ</a>, has asked the <a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/fcc">FCC</a> to investigate <a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> for violating federal call-blocking rules. Basically, Google isn&#8217;t letting Google Voice users connect to pricy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2009/08/google_voice_jawa.jpg"><img src="http://www.imore.com/images/stories/2009/08/google_voice_jawa-400x280.jpg" alt="google_voice_jawa" title="google_voice_jawa" width="400" height="280" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-10379" /></a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/att/">AT&amp;T</a>, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125390758982041819.html">WSJ</a>, has asked the <a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/fcc">FCC</a> to investigate <a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/google-voice/">Google Voice</a> for violating federal call-blocking rules. Basically, Google isn&#8217;t letting Google Voice users connect to pricy adult chat lines and conference services. (The nerve!)</p>

<p>Slapped around by the FCC a couple of years ago on the same charges, AT&amp;T wants Google to get a taste of that medicine, and likely wants to throw some of the heat they caught over the whole <a href="http://www.imore.com/tag/fcc-response/">Apple rejection/still-studying Google Voice</a> debacle right back Google&#8217;s way.</p>

<p><a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/09/response-to-at-letter-to-fcc-on-google.html">Google&#8217;s blog</a> responds thusly:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>AT&amp;T is trying to make this about Google&#8217;s support for an open Internet, but the comparison just doesn&#8217;t fly. The FCC&#8217;s open Internet principles apply only to the behavior of broadband carriers &#8212; not the creators of Web-based software applications. Even though the FCC does not have jurisdiction over how software applications function, AT&amp;T apparently wants to use the regulatory process to undermine Web-based competition and innovation.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Ah, new technology and the laws that trail far back behind it. Google may be <em>technically</em> right in that they&#8217;re something new and different than what the law was originally designed to govern. Clearly the <em>spirit</em> of openness &#8212; which Google pays enormous lip-service to when it suits them &#8212; is what&#8217;s important, though. Isn&#8217;t it Google?</p>

<p>[Via <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5368114/now-att-wants-the-fcc-to-investigate-google-voice">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.imore.com/2009/09/25/att-strikes-asks-fcc-investigate-google-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 17:06:44 -->
