Want amazing new performance out of your old Mac Pro? Here's how

Turbocharging the Mac Pro with SSDs, here's how

Apple's new Mac Pro has some Mac users buzzing: the tiny machine appears to be crazy fast, and it's a total redesign of the system - replacing the giant aluminum box of yore with a tiny little black cylinder. But should you replace your Mac Pro with the new one? If you want to get as much bang for your buck, upgrade your aluminum Mac Pro with an Solid State Drive (SSD).

There are different options available for Mac Pro-compatible SSDs, and we're going to look at two of them here: a SATA-based SSD and a PCIe-based SSD. The bottom line is that you're going to see a huge increase in speed either way; it's just a question of what your budget will allow.

To give you some sense of how significant the difference in speed is, I've borrowed a couple of different products from Other World Computing (OWC). One is a SATA-based SSD - the Mercury Extreme 6G, the other is closer to what the new Mac Pro has - it's a PCIe card with SSDs on it, OWC's Mercury Accelsior_E2. Both the SATA SSD and the PCIe card have 240 gigabyte capacities, which were pretty comparable to the original 320GB 3.5-inch hard drive that came with this Mac Pro. All of them are running fresh copies of Mountain Lion 10.8.4, with up to date security patches.

Making the most of what you have

Obviously the older Mac Pro won't be as fast as the new one, but don't think that your aluminum monolith is completely useless. SSDs have come down in price quite a bit, and if you shop around it's now possible to pick one up (albeit with limited storage capacity) for under $100.

While SSDs cost a lot more per gigabyte than hard disk drives, the difference in speed is amazing. Your Mac Pro will be faster to boot, it will launch applications faster, and it will read and write data faster. How much faster? That depends on which option you choose: SATA or PCI Express (PCIe).

SATA

Mecury Extreme Pro 6G

Serial ATA, or SATA, is the backbone of the aluminum Mac Pro's local data storage interface. Inside your Mac Pro are four SATA bays, each of which can accommodate a 3.5-inch hard disk drive. SATA is also used to connect the internal optical drive (or drives) your Mac Pro comes with.

What makes the SATA bays particularly easy to work with is the Mac Pro's "sled" design - each drive mechanism is mounted on a tray that easily slides out and slides back in, locking the drive into place without needing to manually connect any ribbon cables. It's quick, it's easy and it's trademark Apple elegant, even within the brutalist architecture of the Mac Pro.

The various Mac Pros that have come out over the years differ in speed, interfaces and basic construction, but they all share common features. The internal drive bays are one of those features that's remained a constant through the Mac Pro's evolution, so regardless of which model of Mac Pro you use, it's going to be pretty similar.

Apple's made it very easy to get access to those drive bays, and to put in (and remove) drives. To get inside your Mac Pro, you just lift a lever on the back of the box, then slide out the side panel.

The only tool you'll need is a Philips head screwdriver. The screwdriver is used to actually mate the drive to the tray to hold it in place. But you don't need your own screws - they're built into the sled. The screws match up with mounting holes that are already pre-drilled onto all 3.5-inch hard disk mechanisms.

SATA SSDs are, by and large, designed with a 2.5-inch hard drive in mind, because that's what's used in most laptops - and laptops are very popular. Mounting a 2.5-inch SSD into a 3.5-inch hard drive sled isn't tricky - you just need a simple drive adapter to get the job done. OWC also offers a replacement drive sled that does the job, if you're using a 2009-era or later Mac Pro.

Once you've got the drive in, it's a simple matter of booting up the Mac and running Disk Utility in the Utilities folder. Create a partition map to your liking just like you would a hard drive and you're in business. Easy peasy.

PCIe

Accelsior E2

SATA is terrific because it's easy to work with and it's ubiquitous, so there are a lot of products - both hard drives and SSDs - designed to use it. But it has its limitations. One of them is its bandwidth. The SATA interface on the Mac Pro has a top transfer speed of 3 gigabits per second.

But there's another option if you're interested in maximum performance: go straight to PCI Express (PCIe). PCIe is the expansion card interface on the Mac Pro, the one you use for graphics cards and whatever other expansion cards you want to install. And there's a lot more bandwidth to work with - 10 gigabits per second.

By going PCIe, you're going to more closely align your Mac Pro with Apple's new black, cylindrical Mac Pro. It uses the same connection, eschewing SATA for a direct PCIe link. The same goes for the new Haswell-equipped MacBook Airs that shipped earlier this year.

Installing a PCIe card in the Mac Pro is, in some ways, easier even than a SATA drive. Once you've powered the Mac Pro down and have the side panel off, you simply unscrew a retaining plate near the back of the Mac Pro. Once it's out you can install the new card. You don't need any tools - the retaining bolt's screws can be finger-tightened (and untightened). Once installed and once the Mac is powered, you simply run Disk Utility, and you should see a fresh drive ready for formatting.

One nice thing about the Accelsior E2 and other PCIe-based cards - most of them have removable SSDs on them. Which means that over time, if you need more space, you should be able to simply buy larger SSDs and replace them without having to replace the card all together.

There are a few caveats, depending on the age of your Mac Pro. Early Mac Pros (models built in 2006 and 2007) sport PCIe 1.0 slots that don't perform as fast as later models, so you will be bandwidth-limited on those machines. 2008 models and beyond, like my eight-core Mac Pro, have faster PCIe 2.0 slots. The 2008 model has two 16x slots, and one is occupied by the stock video card. If you're only using one video card, you can use the other for the SSD and see maximum throughput. In any of the other 4x slots you're going to see slower performance. 2009 and newer Mac Pros will see the best performance out of any available slot.

Fast as hell

So what are the benefits of using an SSD? Let's take a look. For comparison's sake, I've run some tests using digital video hardware maker Blackmagic Design's free Disk Speed Test app, available for download from the Mac App Store. This will give you an idea of the devices' raw throughput.

DiskSpeed Test HD results

First up is as close to bone stock as I can get: My 2008 Mac Pro with its factory-original 320GB Seagate hard disk drive, recently reformatted and running a fresh copy of Mountain Lion 10.8.4 with all the latest patches installed.

The drive registers about 101.3 megabytes per second write speed and about 94.4 megabytes read speed using Disk Speed Test. There were brief, sustained periods of faster write speed, but that's about where it settled - having said that, I expected better. Maybe it's because it's a five year old drive that's sat idle for a couple of years. Regardless, it's nowhere near the ceiling of a SATA interface, which is closer to 384 megabytes per second.

Next up is the Mercury Extreme 6G, OWC's fastest 2.5-inch SATA SSD.

DiskSpeedTest Mercury Extreme results As you can see, performance has more than doubled. Sustained writes clock in at 241.4 MB/sec, while sustained reads are even faster at 266.6 MB/sec. Again, this doesn't hit the ceiling of SATA bandwidth, but it comes much closer.

Last, but not least, is the PCIe-based Accelsior E2:

DiskSpeedTest Accelsior E2 results

This thing smokes any other comers. Write speeds blast at about 332.8 MB/sec while read speeds peg the redline of the graphical needle on measurement tool, coming in at 630.9 MB/sec. Astonishing.

You get what you pay for

The performance difference between the average stock hard drive and any SSD is going to be distinct, so don't get too caught up in performance comparisons. You can spend a lot of money getting absolutely the fastest SSD you can afford, but whether it will be worth it is dependent on the age of your machine and its capabilities, as well as what you intend to do with it.

The real showstopper for most of us is price and capacity. For what you'll pay for a 128 gigabyte SSD, you can easily get a two terabyte hard disk drive. (That'd be 24 times the capacity of the 128 GB SSD). PCIe SSD is an even pricier and more specialized option. As a practical example: As I posted this article, you can buy a 2TB Seagate Barracuda hard drive for under $100 from Amazon.com. A 128GB SATA SSD from OWC costs $127.99. A 120GB PCIe SSD from OWC is priced at $329.99. Other manufacturer's prices will vary dramatically, but you get the point: the faster the storage system is, the more you pay.

That means you're not going to replace hard drives with SSD as a primary storage system any time soon. The price has to fall much further and chip density has to improve before there can be anything close to parity.

Best of both worlds

For now, SSDs are most economical and effective when they're used in conjunction with conventional hard drives, much as Apple has done with "Fusion" drives on newer Mac models. You get the capacity of a regular hard disk with some of the benefits of an SSD.

It is possible to "roll your own" Fusion-style device, though it requires using the Terminal and a command line interface. But even before you get to that, you can use your SSD as a regular boot volume. Use it to store a few critical applications and maybe a modest folder of frequently accessed documents, but continue to use SATA-based hard disk drives for everything else: a massive iTunes library, for example, or the apps and utilities that you want on hand but don't use every day.

For an added boost of performance, you can configure multiple drive mechanisms in a RAID - an array that you create using Apple's Disk Utility. You can also see a significant performance increases by "striping" data across multiple drive mechanisms. Combine that with a fast SSD boot volume and you'll be amazed at how much fresher your Mac Pro feels.

The aluminum Mac Pro isn't perfect - it's big, it sucks up a lot of juice and it's been outclassed by Macs with newer features like USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt. But that doesn't mean the Mac Pro is entirely useless, either. It still crunches data hellaciously fast and it's built to last.

Putting in an SSD offers your Mac Pro a new lease on life with a dramatic improvement in performance that will be an eye opener. Consider the pros and cons and decide what your wallet will bear. But in the end, it may turn out that putting in an SSD is the best thing you've done to give your Mac Pro a bit more time before replacing it altogether.

Peter Cohen

Managing Editor of iMore, Mac and gaming specialist and all-around technologist. Follow him on Twitter @flargh

More Posts

 

11
loading...
0
loading...
40
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Amazon to offer discounted Kindle ebooks when you buy real, printed books

Next up →

How to sell your iPhone

Reader comments

Want amazing new performance out of your old Mac Pro? Here's how

14 Comments
Sort by Rating

Thanks! A follow-up piece on how to similarly upgrade old MacBook Pros would be appreciated. I have an early 2008 MacBook Pro that's already gone through one round of upgrades (doubled RAM, tripled/sped up HD drive), but I like my current set up so much that I'm not eager to replace my computer just yet--especially since it seems the system will be capable of running Mavericks, and that should supposedly come with system performance improvements. I'm thinking of replacing the internal drive with an SSD drive to be able to use it for another 2-3 years, but not sure how soon I'll be doing that...

I have a MacBookPro8,3 -- an early 2011 model -- and gave it a new lease on life with a number of upgrades via OWC: a 480GB 6G SSD, a Data Doubler (moved the old HD to the unused DVD bay, and made that my iTunes Library Drive), and maxed the RAM to 16GB. I did this pretty much all at once during a rare work slow-down last year, and it made a massive difference. The RAM, sure, but the SSD was the killer in the equation. Everything just seemed faster; it booted faster, launched apps faster, etc. (FWIW, the bulk of my work is InDesign page layouts.)

I heartily recommend the operation if you need to eek a longer lifespan out of your MBP (or really any Mac; I've since SSD'd a number of MacBooks, iMacs (difficult but do-able) and Mac minis (hair raising but doable). And, not to sound like a commercial, but I've always used OWC's SSDs (either 3G or 6G) and never encountered an issue.

Thanks! I currently have a 750GB internal drive that's usually 80-90% full (iTunes Library, mostly), so I'm just waiting for a similarly-sized and reasonably-priced SSD drive to come along to make the switch.

Got tired of waiting for that, so I went ahead and made the switch in an as-is fashion. The 480 SSD is my main drive and the old platter HD became my iTunes drive -- I have a goodly amount of spare room on both whereas if I'd stayed with just the SSD I'd constantly be having to par down things. (FWIW, OWC does sell a 3G 960 GB SSD, but it's $1050.)

I've seen reviews with some negative comments about OWC items. I've been pretty hesitant to make any upgrades.

I've purchased a number of items from OWC and always been happy with the products and service. In the event of any issues, OWC has taken great care to make it right. I've purchased several SATA hard drives, SSDs, RAM (I buy all of my RAM from OWC these days), bare external drive I/O devices (can't recall the name of it). All have worked out fine.

A couple of months ago I bought 32GB of RAM from OWC and it was acting strangely. Occasionally I'd get a weird dialogue confirming that it was installed correctly. I called them, they sent me new RAM via FedEx and I returned the weird acting RAM. They were great.

Same here; I've been ordering for them for about a decade; the only problem I can recall having was a RAM stick or two going bad (kernel panics). I called my sales rep, Alan B, and he had a replacement on the way by the time we were done with the phone call -- had it in my hand the next day.

Beyond RAM, I've bought a number of hard drives, SSDs, various peripherals (their KX cases for the iPhone and iPad mini are great), external drives (singles, portables, RAIDs), and a copious amount of RAM from them over the years. Never any major issues that I can recall -- just something like the RAM I mentioned, maybe -- and they've always been top-notch about standing behind their product.

My brother has a first gen Mac Pro from 2007. Mac Pro 1,1 I believe. Would there be any gain in a PCIe SSD running on the PCIe 1.0 slot as opposed to a SATA SSD? Also, is it possible to roll a fusion drive utilizing a PCIe SSD (I've done it on my 2011 mini, so I'm not worried about the process)? I'm just looking to help him milk it as long as he can.

I've been sporting a 6G Extreme SSD from OWC for a year or so now. It's slotted into an Apricorn PCI-e card (Velocity Solo x2) and I get about 500MB/sec reads and half that for writes in Black Magic speed test... I'm about to add a second SSD to the backside which supposedly will give me about 800MB/sec due to the striping.

I have a 2012 Mac Pro (purchased just after the new Mac Pro was announced) with an OWC PCIe Accelsior_E2 SSD (240GB) for the boot volume and applications; I have another OWC SSD in the second optical drive bay for Photoshop scratch; and SATA drives in the four HDD bays for my data storage. Together with maxed out RAM (also, OWC), I'm a happy camper.

The new Mac Pro required too long a wait for me, plus the transition to external TB peripherals will be costly until more options are available (not to mention cluttered). I'll revisit the new Mac Pro once the ecosystem has evolved a bit, but for now my (second) old cheese grater is pretty snappy.