The U.S.' biggest carmaker is ditching Apple CarPlay because it might be dangerous

CarPlay setup in 2020 Nissan Qashqai
(Image credit: Future/Lloyd Coombes)

General Motors, the biggest car manufacturer in the US, earlier this year revealed its decision to remove Apple CarPlay from future vehicles but we have only now received the full reason why. 

CarPlay was initially designed to stop Apple users from needlessly scrolling through apps in the car by streamlining many of the most important features like the ability to play music, use Apple Maps, and play a podcast. Tim Babbit, GM head of product for infotainment, informed MT that GM is removing Apple CarPlay and Android Auto due to safety concerns. 

Babbit claimed ‘CarPlay and Android Auto have stability issues that manifest themselves as bad connections, poor rendering, slow responses, and dropped connections.’ in October, there were widespread concerns related to a navigation bug that had the potential to mess up coordinates and break navigation. However, it’s hard to fully see the justification for this decision, especially from an infotainment representative. 

No better alternative – iMore’s take

In an update to the same MT article, GM said “GM's embedded infotainment strategy is driven by the benefits of having a system that allows for greater integration with the larger GM ecosystem and vehicles.” This is more closely in line with what is expected of the brand – a commitment to a CarPlay alternative that does away with the aforementioned security concerns and gives it more control over user choice. Ultimately, without something like CarPlay or Android Auto, some car drivers will resort to just using their phone again, working directly against concerns made. This implies that there is more to this story than just security concerns. 

GM currently has a subscription service called OnStar which includes crash response, Emergency Service access, Stolen Vehicle Assistance, In-vehicle data, and the OnStar Guardian app. It seems possible that the long-term play here is to offer an alternative with this monthly plan, giving GM extra subscriptions and access to all the data that comes with a modern driver. This data could be used for market research or to study new products so has potential value to a company like GM. In an interview with Reuters earlier this year, Mary Barra, a GM Chief Executive revealed that GM is aiming for $20 to $25 billion in annual revenue from subscriptions in just seven years. The decision to phase out CarPlay could be part of how GM does this. 

More from iMore

James Bentley

James is a staff writer and general Jack of all trades at iMore. With news, features, reviews, and guides under his belt, he has always liked Apple for its unique branding and distinctive style. Originally buying a Macbook for music and video production, he has since gone on to join the Apple ecosystem with as many devices as he can fit on his person. 

With a degree in Law and Media and being a little too young to move onto the next step of his law career, James started writing from his bedroom about games, movies, tech, and anything else he could think of. Within months, this turned into a fully-fledged career as a freelance journalist. Before joining iMore, he was a staff writer at Gfinity and saw himself published at sites like TechRadar, NME, and Eurogamer. 

As his extensive portfolio implies, James was predominantly a games journalist before joining iMore and brings with him a unique perspective on Apple itself. When not working, he is trying to catch up with the movies and albums of the year, as well as finally finishing the Yakuza series. If you like Midwest emo music or pretentious indie games that will make you cry, he’ll talk your ear off.

  • Annie_M
    This is a bunch of nonsense, in my less-than-humble opinion. Ultimately, it's about increasing their revenue stream! GM would benefit from selling OnStar subscriptions.

    133388
    Reply
  • naddy69
    I don't even know what "CarPlay" is. I just make a bluetooth connection. Works fine.

    BTW, whoever took that picture, your car is disgustingly dirty.
    Reply
  • aergern
    Dangerous? So, Siri reading texts out loud is more dangerous than grabbing your phone to read it. Or maybe having a big screen with maps on it is more dangerous that mounting your phone in line of site.

    Horse sh** ... this is to sell their subscriptions and add on BS. 'Merica!

    I think I'll stick with imports.
    Reply
  • Just_Me_D
    aergern said:
    Dangerous? So, Siri reading texts out loud is more dangerous than grabbing your phone to read it. Or maybe having a big screen with maps on it is more dangerous that mounting your phone in line of site.

    Horse sh** ... this is to sell their subscriptions and add on BS. 'Merica!

    I think I'll stick with imports.

    Yep. I’m still happy with my 430i as well as wireless CarPlay. When I want to switch things up, I can use the built-in system via Bluetooth to play my Music playlists.
    Reply
  • nr2d
    GM's rationalization on removing Carplay is BS. I had a 2023 Chevy Tahoe for 11 months. It cost me $800+/year to get the same capabilities that I have with Apple Carplay which cost me about $900, once, for my iPhone 15 Pro Max in my new Ford Expedition. I do pay $12/month for Fords streaming service which is a hell of a lot cheaper then GM. All GM is worried about is increasing it's revenue than providing quality services for it's customers.

    Plus Chevy's offline maps are worthless. I have used Ford's Sync 4 offline maps in areas where I had no cell service. They not quite as good as CarPlay but 100% better than the GM equivalent.
    Reply
  • gian posatiere
    nr2d said:
    GM's rationalization on removing Carplay is BS. I had a 2023 Chevy Tahoe for 11 months. It cost me $800+/year to get the same capabilities that I have with Apple Carplay which cost me about $900, once, for my iPhone 15 Pro Max in my new Ford Expedition. I do pay $12/month for Fords streaming service which is a hell of a lot cheaper then GM. All GM is worried about is increasing it's revenue than providing quality services for it's customers.

    Plus Chevy's offline maps are worthless. I have used Ford's Sync 4 offline maps in areas where I had no cell service. They not quite as good as CarPlay but 100% better than the GM equivalent.
    You know you can download Apple maps for offline use now? I downloaded all of California.
    Reply
  • naddy69
    If you read the whole story, GM is also removing Android Auto for the same reasons.
    Reply
  • Lee_Bo
    gian posatiere said:
    You know you can download Apple maps for offline use now? I downloaded all of California.

    I jumped on the iOS 17 beta train just to give that a try. Unfortunately it’s still not up to par with Google and their offline maps.

    The only GM vehicle I ever had was a 1973 El Camino SS with a 454. Loved that car. But I’m staying with Honda from here on out.
    Reply