What you need to know
- A shocking UK court case has ruled that a man who installed a Ring doorbell camera at his home violated his neighbor's privacy.
- A judge has ruled that Jon Woodard violated the Data Protection act and UK GDPR laws because his cameras recorded his neighbor.
- He could be forced to pay £100,000 in compensation.
A UK judge has ruled that a man who installed two Amazon Ring Doorbells at his home in Oxfordshire breached his neighbor's privacy and owes her thousands of pounds in compensation.
The Daily Mail reports that Jon Woodard had installed two Ring Doorbell cameras at his home in order to protect his property, along with two dummy units that he used to deter car thieves after an attempted theft in 2019.
The report states that Woodard's neighbor, a doctor who runs a holistic healthcare company, took him to court over claims the devices were subjecting her to 'continuous visual surveillance' and were 'intrusive. Turns out that judge Melissa Clarke agreed:
Any files or audio from the doorbells that include Dr. Fairhurst are now considered her personal data, and that as controller of that data by the terms of the law, Mr. Woodard had not stored the data in a "fair or transparent way." Furthermore:
The judge said a camera in Mr. Woodard's driveway had been used to record his neighbor's gate, garden, and parking space, however, Mr. Woodard said this device was a dummy. The judge claimed further that the audio range of the doorbell was "well beyond the range of video that they capture, and in my view cannot be said to be reasonable for crime prevention."
The judge not only ruled that Mr. Woodard owed his neighbor compensation, but that he would have to put "blinkers" on his cameras so they didn't capture any of his neighbor's property, and he has been ordered by the court to disable the audio on the devices.
In response, Ring, which is owned by Amazon, said it was encouraging its users to let people know they were being filmed by using Ring stickers on their doors and windows. A spokesperson said:
Ring Doorbells, like many of the best HomeKit video doorbells on offer can be used to answer the door, even when a resident isn't at home. They also have a security use however as most come with a camera, microphone, and monitoring systems.
Stephen Warwick has written about Apple for five years at iMore and previously elsewhere. He covers all of iMore's latest breaking news regarding all of Apple's products and services, both hardware and software. Stephen has interviewed industry experts in a range of fields including finance, litigation, security, and more. He also specializes in curating and reviewing audio hardware and has experience beyond journalism in sound engineering, production, and design.
Before becoming a writer Stephen studied Ancient History at University and also worked at Apple for more than two years. Stephen is also a host on the iMore show, a weekly podcast recorded live that discusses the latest in breaking Apple news, as well as featuring fun trivia about all things Apple.
The daily Mail isn’t a great source of anything.
Having said that the defendants house didn’t even point at the claimants so you’d have to wonder why his was filming this neighbour at all.
Ring cameras are garbage, police can gain access to your camera feed, and nobody should ever use them.
Get the best of iMore in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to iMore. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.