<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone App Avalanche 11: Thumbtacts, TapeMe, iExchange, and Aqua</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: p.b.</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/comment-page-1/#comment-16442</link>
		<dc:creator>p.b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4652#comment-16442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the new format alot. I used to skip app avalanches because there was to much info. This is great for me - what&#039;s hot whats not.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new format alot. I used to skip app avalanches because there was to much info. This is great for me &#8211; what&#8217;s hot whats not.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/comment-page-1/#comment-16325</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4652#comment-16325</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I like the new format, but wish u would inform us about more than 3 good and one bad app.  I think the new format works, it just seems rushed, unlike previous weeks.  Also I could care less what other reviewers say, I can read that on my own also.  Keep up the good work, maybe a free and paid top 3 and crapp section each would work!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the new format, but wish u would inform us about more than 3 good and one bad app.  I think the new format works, it just seems rushed, unlike previous weeks.  Also I could care less what other reviewers say, I can read that on my own also.  Keep up the good work, maybe a free and paid top 3 and crapp section each would work!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/comment-page-1/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4652#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@JKT and christomapher: thanks for your comments! I appreciate you reading the Avalanche each week. Sometimes a change in format is received well, and sometimes it isn&#039;t. I welcome your feedback and the feedback from any other readers. Feel free to comment, folks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JKT and christomapher: thanks for your comments! I appreciate you reading the Avalanche each week. Sometimes a change in format is received well, and sometimes it isn&#8217;t. I welcome your feedback and the feedback from any other readers. Feel free to comment, folks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christomapher</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/comment-page-1/#comment-16206</link>
		<dc:creator>christomapher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4652#comment-16206</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@JKT:  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t want to waste my time scouring the App Store&#039;s thousands of apps to find the cream of the crop and I really appreciate the fact that TiPB is assisting me in that matter.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I CERTAINLY don&#039;t want to waste my money by purchasing apps based solely on novice reviews written by users in the app store (some of which don&#039;t even own the app).  I would much rather have a power user/professional reviewing and trying the apps out for me so I can save my money if the app ends up being a CrApp.  That&#039;s where Avalanche comes in play.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would imagine one of the reasons why there are less apps featured in Avalanche these days is simply because when the App Store debuted, there was a lot to cover because there were many apps available right away.  Now that the App Store has been around for a while, there is less new stuff to cover.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Make sense?  I know bookmarks don&#039;t take up a lot of room.  So keep it, you might find something really useful.  (Thanks for the PDANet info!)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JKT:  </p>

<p>I don&#8217;t want to waste my time scouring the App Store&#8217;s thousands of apps to find the cream of the crop and I really appreciate the fact that TiPB is assisting me in that matter.  </p>

<p>I CERTAINLY don&#8217;t want to waste my money by purchasing apps based solely on novice reviews written by users in the app store (some of which don&#8217;t even own the app).  I would much rather have a power user/professional reviewing and trying the apps out for me so I can save my money if the app ends up being a CrApp.  That&#8217;s where Avalanche comes in play.</p>

<p>I would imagine one of the reasons why there are less apps featured in Avalanche these days is simply because when the App Store debuted, there was a lot to cover because there were many apps available right away.  Now that the App Store has been around for a while, there is less new stuff to cover.</p>

<p>Make sense?  I know bookmarks don&#8217;t take up a lot of room.  So keep it, you might find something really useful.  (Thanks for the PDANet info!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JKT</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/09/29/iphone-app-avalanche-11/comment-page-1/#comment-16205</link>
		<dc:creator>JKT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=4652#comment-16205</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I vote that you return &quot;Avalanche&quot; to the old format. You used to have info on 12 apps, and now it&#039;s down to just 4. That makes it much less valuable to we the readers. Also, we can read App Store reviews ourselves--we want you to add some valuable insight.
In fact, the weekly Avalanche feature is the main reason I came to your site. If you&#039;re going to effectively do away with it as you have here in #11, I&#039;m unlikely to keep you bookmarked. Sorry, but that&#039;s how I feel.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote that you return &#8220;Avalanche&#8221; to the old format. You used to have info on 12 apps, and now it&#8217;s down to just 4. That makes it much less valuable to we the readers. Also, we can read App Store reviews ourselves&#8211;we want you to add some valuable insight.
In fact, the weekly Avalanche feature is the main reason I came to your site. If you&#8217;re going to effectively do away with it as you have here in #11, I&#8217;m unlikely to keep you bookmarked. Sorry, but that&#8217;s how I feel.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 17:13:17 -->
