The iPad mini: Would Apple release a 7.68-inch iPad and what it would mean for iOS and the tablet market?

The iPad mini

Would Apple release a 7.85-inch iPad and what it would mean for iOS and the tablet market?

While Apple has been busy launching the new iPad -- their third generation 9.7-inch iPad now with eyeball popping Retina display -- the rumor mills have kept on churning away about the iPad mini. A still-mythical 7- to 8-inch iPad, it would compete with the still-not-competitive (marketshare wise) BlackBerry PlayBooks and Amazon Kindle Fires of the budget tablet world, while also not being as portable as a 3.5-inch, $199 iPod touch.

The iPad customer

Apple no doubt has an iPad mini in the labs, just like they have an iPhone nano in the labs. Whether they ever bring it to market, however, is the question. So far they haven't pulled the trigger on the iPhone nano, or on the also-surely-in-the-labs Apple iTV television that's busily competing for rumor attention. Before anything else, before technology, before experience even, Apple is a go-to-market company.

The reason the current iPad is 9.7-inches is that, in all likelihood, it was designed with one specific customer in mind. The ultimate customer. Steve Jobs. Before his untimely passing, Apple's co-founder was the absolute best product guy in the business, and hit more Babe Ruth-style home runs out of more technology parks than anyone.

Apple tested numerous screen sizes and ultimate they, and Jobs, felt the 4:3 aspect ratio, 9.7-inch diagonal display size was the perfect confluence of portability, flexibility, and functionality. It was the best size and shape for browsing, email, music, video, games, and reading. It could, in Jobs' words, run a new class of software that wasn't just scaled-up smartphone apps or awkwardly transplanted PC mouse-and-pointer apps. It could be a transformative device.

The market has proven him right. While competitors continue to misstep thinking they can get an advantage through higher specs, more desktop-like interfaces, more complex gestural controls, or cheaper, content-subsidized models, they've gained almost no traction in the global market because customers haven't shown any real interest in any of those things.

There's no tablet market because the iPad isn't a tablet in the traditional sense. It's a computing appliance that's far more accessible to a far wider customer base than ever before. It's Steve Jobs' relentless mainstreaming and democratization of technology taken to its highest level so far.

My 2 year old godson could use it. My mom can use it. I can use it. That's how you go to market with a goal of selling hundreds of millions of devices, not hundreds of dozens.

The challenges of the 7-inch tablet

Tablet (read: iPad and Kindle) ownership almost doubled over the holidays

Steve Jobs was also directly dismissive of smaller tablet formats, saying they weren't just smaller, but were significantly smaller (half the size). He did not believe great tablet apps could run on smaller 7-inch diagonal screens. He said that Apple had done extensive testing and really understood the usability implications -- that there were limits as to how close you could pack interface elements. He called 7-inch tablets DOA.

Granted, he was addressing 7-inch tablets that weren't running Apple software. Jobs has also said Apple wouldn't make a phone and that no one wanted to watch video on an iPod, so what he tells the public at one point in time clearly doesn't always reflect what Apple may or may not release in the future. Especially in a future that no longer includes him at the helm.

The 7.85-inch sweet spot

BlackBerry PlayBook 2.0 vs. iPad 2 feature comparison

A.T. Faust from App Advice has a tremendous article up crunching the numbers on a 7-inch iPad.

Apple will release a 7.85-inch tablet later this year. And yes, it’s going to be called the iPad mini. It may or may not have the “skinny” bezel everyone’s been talking about, but two things are crystal clear: It’ll sport a 163 PPI 1024 x 768 display, and lots of folks are going to buy it.

He makes a great case for why, including manufacturing efficiencies and app compatibility. Indeed, if Apple does release an iPad mini, for the reasons Faust states, it could very well be that size, at that pixel density.

But back to the challenges

iPad photo gallery

Even granting everything above, that a 7.85-inch iPad mini makes the most sense, there are still a few questions left to ponder.

What about the exiting iPad mini, the iPod touch?

Apple hasn't updated the iPod touch since fall of 2010. It's the only iOS device that hasn't received an update in the last 12 months. It's also already priced at $299. Right now, it seems to exist as an inexpensive point-of-entry to iTunes and the App Store, and way to get non-iPhone and non-iPad users into the iOS ecosystem.

Does that hint that Apple's interest in budget mobiles, like budget Macs, is limited? If it is, is there room for an iPad mini?

Where does the iPad mini fit between the iPad and iPod touch?

If the iPod touch line continues, and doesn't get replaced by something bigger, where would a baseline iPad mini fit between the $199 iPod touch and $399 iPad 2?

$299 is the obvious answer. But is that cheap enough to compete against $199 BlackBerry PlayBooks and Kindle Fires? Against budget Android tablets?

If it goes to $199 (or even if it only goes to $299), would that cannibalize iPod touch or iPad sales? Apple usually doesn't care about cannibalizing their own products to prevent competitors from doing it, but there has to be a compelling marketing reason to do it. Apple would have to feel they could sell enough iPad minis to overcome any loss of iPad sales, the same way they're selling so many iPads it easily eclipses any loss of Mac sales. (And, according to Apple, hurts Windows PC sales more than Apple Mac sales -- a bonus.)

Apple never made a cheaper MacBook to combat low end Windows netbooks. They made the MacBook Air and iPad instead. If the Kindle Fire or other budget tablets ever become a legitimate threat to Apple's profits, they may not respond with a cheaper iPad either. Winning the top end and eschewing the low end in Macs has kept them so far ahead of the industry in terms of profits that they could well choose the same strategy for tablets.

What compelling market demand would Apple satisfy with a 7.85-inch iPad that isn't already satisfied by the existing 9.7-inch iPad or 3.5-inch iPod touch (or iPhone)? If they determine there is one, then like the iPod market, it would make sense to start filling out the line with cheaper alternatives. If they determine there isn't one, then the answer is even simpler.

How would an iPad mini fit in Apple's release schedule?

Apple apparently isn't going to release any more iOS devices this summer, just like they didn't release any last summer, and they're going to be releasing a new iPhone this fall, like they did last fall. Where would an iPad mini fit into that release schedule?

Would Apple piggy back it onto the new iPhone cycle? Would Apple do an additional iPod event this fall and attach it that? Would Apple wait until 2013 for the next iPad event?

Launches are part of going to market, and something Apple takes seriously. What's the window for an iPad mini?

Counter-Resolutionary

iOS devices all currently sport HiDPI Retina displays (even the 2010 iPod touch). If Apple goes with 163 ppi for the iPad mini, would that be a step backwards? Apple typically doesn't go into reverse when it comes to technology.

If Apple is locked on Retina as the future of all iOS products, would they pixel double an iPad mini display and make it to 326 ppi to pass the Retina threshold? If they did, is there any way they could still hit the $299 price point. Could they hit $199?

User experience

Would a reduction from 9.7-inches to 7.85-inches harm the usability of existing iPad apps by scaling down their interface elements too severely? There's an argument to be made that it would.

Yes, original iPhone apps were 3.5-inches at 168 dpi, but they were also 480x320 and optimized for smartphones, not the tablet-class apps the iPad enjoys and Steve Jobs specifically pointed out. iPhone apps did, and still do, present a different user interface than iPad apps, with a single visible column view rather than multiple column views.

Reducing iPad apps to iPhone-like user element sizes might not be the best of both worlds. It might be the worst. It would result in the kinds of compromises -- developers and designers having to make single touch targets to suit both physical sizes -- that the original iPad and it's UI scale was created specifically to avoid.

Creating a 3rd UI size isn't a great alternative either. Having regular and HD versions of apps, or universal apps with both 3.5-inch and 9.7 inch interfaces in them, creates a better user experience but requires more heavy lifting from developers (fine) and more management from users (acceptable). Having regular, mid-sized, and HD versions, or universal apps with 3 interfaces baked in would mean even heavier lifting and more complex management, and larger app sizes for universal binaries. Again, the rewards would have to eclipse the costs.

The mini mindset

Numbers for iPhone and iPad review

Apple expanded the iPod line with the iPod mini, then replaced that with the iPod nano and added the iPod shuffle. They blanketed the price points and feature levels, and left no space for competitors to get a foothold.

Apple has thus far not expanded the iPhone line, not introduced the iPhone nano, and removed space by keeping previous generation iPhones around at $100 discount levels.

Apple has thus far not expanded the iPad line either, not introduced the iPad mini, and removed some space by keeping the previous generation iPad around at a $100 discount.

The iPad could very well become like the iPod with several models to address several different market segments, but it hadn't yet. Steve Jobs seemed genuinely against it, given the market and technology of the time. Tim Cook's Apple might not be as religious about it, and market and technology conditions will continue to change.

However, just like the iPad had to be fundamentally better at certain things than the smartphone or laptop for Apple to release it, an iPad mini would have to be fundamentally better for a certain type of user than an iPod touch or iPad for Apple to take it to market.

They won't ever do it just because they can. They'll only do it when, and if, they feel they should.

iMore iPad mini concept by John Anastasiadis

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, ZEN and TECH, MacBreak Weekly. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter, App.net, Google+.

More Posts

 

3
loading...
0
loading...
97
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Review: Angry Birds Space - entering orbit at the speed of rage

Next up →

iPhone & iPad Live tonight at 9pm ET/6pm PT

There are 26 comments. Add yours.

robnaj says:

What if they go bigger and call the old one mini

sting7k says:

Apple could bring back the September music event and do it there this year. They could release a new iTunes, iPod Touch becomes iPad Nano, and iPad Mini announced.

fahfah says:

Would that mean a MaxiPad and a MiniPad?

Hammy says:

Releasing a smaller, cheaper iPad would give Apple something to release before Christmas 2012 to steal sales from Android.
Plus it gives them a "new" product to release that replaces the iPad 2, but likely leverages some of its existing manufacturing costs, and it addresses another niche that Apple doesn't fill today.
It's clearly a pretty simple win for Apple.

Rene Ritchie says:

Android has no significant global tablet sales to steal. Even if it did, did Apple try to steal sales from netbook makers with smaller/cheaper MacBooks?

Tony Moody says:

Huh? The Kindle Fire says hello.

cardfan says:

I'd definitely get this to replace an ipod touch for the kiddo. But i'd have no use for it otherwise.

FlopTech says:

Re: "Before anything else, before technology, before experience even, Apple is a go-to-market company."
Exactly. Apple won't release a product until they have a business model for it. Never "me too and gee I hope it sells."
Re: ..."is there any way they could still hit the $299 price point. Could they hit $199?"
Maybe. Remember that Sharp's IGZO LCD panel technology is just one step toward lower-cost displays. Sharp has also developed a process for high-yield low-cost OLED "printing." Eventually that will allow Apple to ship all their devices with lower-cost, lower-power, higher quality screens.
And, because the potential iPad mini only needs 1024x768 pixels, it wouldn't require as powerful a CPU or GPU as the HiDPI iPad does. Again lowering component costs. (Also, having two different resolutions for graphics is nothing new in the iOS development world, but we're under NDA so that's all we'll say about that.)

T-Will says:

Link bait (and I fell for it). Good analysis though.
Personally, I would rather the iPad have a slightly larger screen (with a slightly smaller bezel).
If they could increase the screen size 1 inch to 10.7", it would be almost the size of an 8.5"x11" piece of paper, making reading book, magazines, sheet music, and spreadsheets much more comfortable.
Maybe there is a market for a 7" iPad, but not for me.

Rene Ritchie says:

Linkbait and good analysis? That like me saying you troll well? :P

David Ferrandino says:

I want a larger iPhone that runs iPad apps too

Ben says:

I see Apple going with a much larger iPad instead of an iMac touch. About 12-24 months from now. Long enough for Apple to get that screen size to retina and cheap enough to mass produce. Other signs point in that direction too

AshGetsCrabs says:

Tim Cook isn't in the Skull and bones society so from now on Apple is going downhill. Remember I said that.

Mark says:

I have an iPad mini already - it's called an iPhone.

Larry G says:

I could see a 7" MiniPad replacing the 16Gb baseline iPad 2 at the $399 price point. They don't need MiniPad, iPad2 and the new iPad all at the same time. I think a $299 1024x768 MiniPad would eat into the iPod Touch sales a bit too much. I could also see them introducing a larger iPod Touch instead, but I don't expect them to add 3G or LTE to either of these sub-iPad devices. And I don't expect them to offer any "larger than Touch" tablet for less than $399.

Plazmic Flame says:

At a $199 price point, I can enter the tablet space. Do it Apple!

kayno says:

Apple makes and will always make.. One iPhone, one iPad, One iPod touch.. and will always sell the previous generation as the Budget model... you guys need to get over this smaller iPad business.

Jessica says:

I would love a mini iPad. I think the current size is a little too big for me. I'd prefer something like the Kindle fire, on iOS. Would make a great Christmas present. ;)

Jay jay says:

what they need is a better iPod touch, the poor thing has gotten no love for 2 plus years,I'm thinking 5-ish inch screen, 512-1GB ram, dual core,
8MP back camera with flash 2-3MP front and hopefully a less crappy backing than that shinny chrome stuff, and kill off the 8GB model that thing is a joke, start at 16GB, oh and maybe add a new 128GB high end one.

jaguar pc hosting says:

I believe this is one of the so much significant information for me. And i'm satisfied reading your article. However wanna observation on some general issues, The site taste is ideal, the articles is in reality excellent : D. Just right task, cheers

plunder says:

I use a 7 inch Android tablet and sometimes I would prefer something iPad sized (especially with that nice screen). However I never feel like leaving it behind and it is much better one handed - the downside is lack of resolution. Perhaps we need a choice.
For me the problems with all iPads is the lack of ports, simple card expansion and a file management system that works. For example, I just connect my tablet, which is recognised as a drive, then transfer files and manage folders however I choose. That is how life should be Apple, so why not learn from it.

birdman_38 says:

To hell with it, Appple should just make a 17.5 inch "iPad Maximum".

Shane says:

Yet another useless product that apple fanboys will throw their money at.
Other tablets do more for less. And feel better IMO.
Dont bother replying i wont be reading nor replying to comments. I know people will try to call me an idiot and what not. Enjoy, but do realize apple is not the best thing ever. If people took the time to understand the products they purchase they would not have a problem with other devices.

Doctor says:

Apple 'fanboys' don't want to have to understand the products they purchase. They just want to use them. You fail to realize this. You think 'doing more' makes a better product. It doesn't. Tablet A may have some features that tablet B hasn't, but if tablet B offers an easier and more enjoyable user experience then most people will choose for tablet B. It's only the geeks that would pick tablet A, because they don't care about a difficult or cumbersome user experience. But normal people do.

Bruno says:

I bet the little fanboy hipsters that ride public transportation in my city would buy a MiniPad. I've seen some nasty drops before because the MegaPad is too bulky and cumbersome for their tiny hands. 700 dollars for a MegaPad, but they won't buy an OtterBox or something? Silly!