Late last week, the feds showed up at the home of John Kinnucan and arrested him on charges related to insider trading.
John Kinnucan is an equity analyst who founded his own research firm, Broadband Research, LLC. Firms like this employ analysts to do research on stocks. They then "sell" that research to institutional investors. In case the term "institutional investor" is new to you, it just means hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, or any other "professional" money manager.
Since I worked as an equity analyst in the technology sector for over 10 years, I am always fascinated by stories like this because they point to the pressure that analysts are under to uncover differentiated information on stocks. If an analyst doesn't have an "angle" on a stock, it's very hard to build up a reputation and get paid.
I'm not condoning Kinnucan's behavior nor am I stating an opinion on whether he did anything illegal or not. I don't know him, nor do I know anyone at his firm or any of the people involved in the story. So let's simply examine the allegations the Feds are making for the purposes of explaining what it all means. Ok? (We're not turning this into a discussion of guilt vs. innocence.)
Institutional investors pay for research by directing trading commissions to the research firms that provide good quality research. Analysts usually need to prove their worth by servicing clients first, and then asking to get paid. It's a strange world because there is no set price for a particular research report. There is no subscription to an analyst's research. Money managers just pay what they want to pay by directing commissions.
In many ways, it's like running a tech blog. If you don't have good stuff to publish, nobody cares. You won't get traffic. You won't generate any advertising revenue.
My point is that providing equity research is a highly competitive business. And if you're a small guy running your own shop, like Kinnucan, you need to have some kind of edge over the larger research shops in order to get paid. Big money managers don't just take pity on you because you're small. They could care less. Help them make better investment decisions and they pay you. End of story.
Of course there are legal ways to gather and sell equity research, and then there are illegal ways to do it. Illegal methods have a much higher potential payoff (since clients who pay for this type of research can generate huge profits), but it can also land you in jail if you get caught. Dangerous game.
So what exactly constitutes illegal activity when it comes to equity research? Disclaimer: I'm not a securities lawyer. That said, you need to understand two things about so-called "information" on a company.
Public versus non-public
Information in the public domain can never get you in trouble. Something written in an annual report, in a press release, stated on a conference call, or otherwise available for the world to access, is safe territory. Investment decisions that you make based on public information are never illegal. Passing on public information is not illegal.
On the other hand, "non-public" information might be illegal to use, but not always. Non-public information is anything that the general public does not have access to.
Material versus non-material
All information is either relevant, or not relevant. Say you come across some "inside" (non-public) information. To know if it's material you just need to ask yourself, "If the whole world knew this would the stock price react?"
Here are two totally fabricated examples:
- The front-end RF power amplifier supplier to Apple told me that they're shipping 100 million chips to Flextronics for the iPad 3 in March.
- My friend who works for Apple told me that the bathrooms are being renovated to include bidets for better employee cleanliness.
Yeah, as you may have guessed, the second bit of "insider" information isn't something Kinnucan (or any other analyst) would be calling his hedge fund clients about. But the first piece of info? It wouldn't take a rocket scientist to realize the 1:1 relationship between that type of part and the number of iPads being built. It would certainly be meaningful to Apple stock since it would imply massive shipments above current Street estimates. If the world knew this information, Apple stock would be trading a lot higher.
So it's the combination of non-public (i.e. insider) information that is "material" to a stock where people can get in trouble.
Oh, and you don't actually need to make an investment using your material insider information to get in trouble. Telling someone else still puts you on the opposite end of the law. But as we'll soon discuss, massively publicizing the information seems to keep you safe from prosecution.
Analysts and information
Usually analysts come across material insider information by forming trusted relationships with people in the know. A sales executive at an Apple supplier should have detailed knowledge of how many parts he's forecast to sell. He'll be one of the first to hear about a change in forecast. Changes in supply forecasts are highly sensitive and could certainly classify as material inside information.
If an analyst gains access to material insider information and tells a select group of clients, then he is breaking the law.
What makes equity research different than blogging?
You might wonder why an equity analyst can go to jail for leaking insider information to hedge fund clients, but bloggers never seem to get in trouble for publishing details of upcoming product launches that came from obviously-insider sources.
Like I said, I'm not a legal expert, but I see one HUGE difference. It's about where the money comes from. The business models are totally different.
If a blogger gets insider information and publishes it on his website, he gets paid with a massive increase in traffic, incoming links (which translate to more traffic and website authority). For website owners, traffic equals money (assuming they know how to monetize the traffic).
The blogger is also leaking the information to the entire world in one fell swoop. The value of insider information to a website comes from being the exclusive source of the news. By contrast, the value of insider information to a hedge fund comes from being the exclusive holder of the news, such that profit can be made by trading on the information.
Trading on material insider information is illegal. But nobody seems to get prosecuted for taking insider information and turning it into public information because there is no stock-based profit being made.
Insider trading rules are in place to protect honest investors from getting screwed at the expense of dishonest ones. Bloggers who leak insider information are not helping dishonest investors. They're just taking traffic away from competitors.
But, if a blogger decided to take his insider information and call up Mr. Hedge Fund and provide exclusive access to this information for a hefty fee before publishing it, you can bet he'd be thrown in jail along with the hedge fund client.
Somehow, I think the blogging community will steer clear from this type of trouble. It just doesn't make financial sense for exclusive leaks to be sold to unscrupulous investors. It makes far more sense to capitalize on the traffic and authority that it builds.
Chris Umiastowski is a former sell-side equity analyst at Orion Securities and TD Securities. Before that, he was an engineer for Nortel Networks. Chris is co-host of the Mobile Nations Stock Talk podcast.
Former sell side analyst, out-of-box thinker, consultant, entrepreneur. Interests: Wife & kids, tech, NLP, fitness, travel, investing, 4HWW.
Didn't read, lol.
Why comment then? Just to waste time?
I'm glad I not in the business of stocks, seems like a fine line between and great deal and a jail sentence.
Chances make champions
Lol didn't read either. Way too long.
I read the whole thing... Normally I don't comment but I felt the need to offset the 2 jerks. Thanks for the write-up
I liked the article and it offered some variety. Maybe if some people read more instead of commenting "I didnt read", America wouldn't be perceived as ignorant by the rest of the world.
Jon, there is a lot of reading material available for children. You might want to investigate Dr. Seuss.
Jon, in addition to your Dr. Seuss loans from the library, you should investigate a concept known by us educated folks as "time zones".
I know it can be confusing for someone who has only learned to read as recently as you. You can do it.
I will immediately snatch your rss feed as I can't in finding your email subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service. Do you have any? Please permit me realize in order that I may subscribe. Thanks.
Fantastic publish, very informative. I ponder why the other specialists of this sector don't realize this. You must proceed your writing. I'm sure, you've a great readers' base already!|What's Taking place i am new to this, I stumbled upon this I've found It absolutely useful and it has aided me out loads. I'm hoping to contribute & help different customers like its helped me. Great job.
Hi there. Very nice web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb .. I'll bookmark your website and take the feeds also...I'm happy to find so much useful information right here within the post. Thank you for sharing.
Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing some research on that. And he just bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch! "Never let inexperience get in the way of ambition." by Terry Josephson.
Wow! This could be one particular of the most useful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Wonderful. I am also an expert in this topic so I can understand your hard work.
Your star sign tells you about your nature and traits such as flexibility in various situations, numerous tasking, persistence and your interests. It tells you whether you have the capability to create buddies, tells about your social nature and attitude towards life.
Welcome to Herve Leger Dresses outlet online! Herve Leger Dresses outlet
Get the best of iMore in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to iMore. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.