Ethics board warns contact tracing apps could amplify inequality
What you need to know
- An Ethics Board has warned the NHS that its contact tracing app could exacerbate inequality.
- That's because 21% of British adults don't own a smartphone.
- The warning highlights the wider global limitation of contact tracing.
An ethics board has warned the NHS that its contact tracing app could amplify inequality in the UK, on the basis that 21% of adults do not own a smartphone.
The Financial Times notes the board's fears that many potential users in the country "will not have up-to-date smartphones - or any device at all."
In the letter, penned April 24 and published yesterday, chair of the COVID-19 app's Ethics Advisory Board Professor Sir Jonathan Montgomery writes:
Montgomery further urges "a consideration of the extent to which the app could introduce or exacerbate inequities."
Recent data from the UK's Office of National Statistics has revealed that the poorest parts of England, Wales, and Scotland are all more likely to bear the brunt of COVID-19 infection. From that report:
Contact tracing by way of an app could further highlight this divide, as it requires a smartphone to be functional. Recent estimates peg the UK's adult population at over 53 million. The 21% gap in smartphone adoption means that more than 10 million people may be excluded, and it is likely that many of these will be more elderly members of the population who are not digitally enabled or the poorer members of society who can't afford to buy a smartphone.
These problems, of course, are not limited to the UK, nowhere globally is smartphone adoption universal, and as with the UK, it is highly plausible that two significant limiting factors are age and wealth. The report notes that this highlights the need to focus not only on contact tracing through apps and smartphones but also using health workers through more traditional means of communication.
Beyond inequality, Montgomery also highlighted that the speed at which at the app is being developed should "not undermine the importance of scrutiny or the need for transparency". He also noted that commitments should not be made to citizens to maximize adoption of the app, which are then reversed at a later date, noting that this "would profoundly damage public trust."
Get more iMore in your inbox!
Our news, reviews, opinions, and easy to follow guides can turn any iPhone owner into an Apple aficionado
Stephen Warwick has written about Apple for five years at iMore and previously elsewhere. He covers all of iMore's latest breaking news regarding all of Apple's products and services, both hardware and software. Stephen has interviewed industry experts in a range of fields including finance, litigation, security, and more. He also specializes in curating and reviewing audio hardware and has experience beyond journalism in sound engineering, production, and design.
Before becoming a writer Stephen studied Ancient History at University and also worked at Apple for more than two years. Stephen is also a host on the iMore show, a weekly podcast recorded live that discusses the latest in breaking Apple news, as well as featuring fun trivia about all things Apple. Follow him on Twitter @stephenwarwick9