AirPods 2 (2019) Rumor Roundup
Update: AirPods 2 are official. Order now (opens in new tab) or read our preview.
Essentially EarPods with the cords cut off and the stems and buds crammed full of sensors and custom silicon, they looked goofy, they cost more than what you found in dollar stores, and they took longer than expected to hit the market.
But when they finally did, and people got a taste of the freedom that came from no longer having strings to hold them down, we went from the usual self-proclaimed techsperts poking fun at them to to AirPods being heralded as one of the best products to come from Apple in years.
That was 2016 though. So, what can we expect from AirPods in 2019?
Rather watch than read? Hit play on the video above and subscribe for more.
February 17, 2019: AirPods 2 yet again rumored for the first half of this year
Kuo Ming-Chi is rounding up his early 2019 predictions and AirPods are on the list. Nothing new or different, just comfortingly more of the same. Via MacRumors:
February 16, 2019: AirPods 2 could be coming soon... in textured black!
Another day, another rumor about next-generation AirPods enterting production.
From Taiwan's Economic Daily:
Can Product RED be far behind?
February 12, 2019: AirPods 2 could come sometime in March... maybe
Schrödinger's AirPods rumors today leave us both expecting and not expecting AirPods 2 as soon as next month. Or this fall. It's obviously complicated.
If Apple holds a spring event the week of March 26th, orders could certainly start on March 29. But let's just wait on those invitations first.
So, maybe let's just wait until the event first as well.
February 11, 2019: AirPods 2 could come in texture black — wait, what?
I'd love AirPods in black, even if it's a departure from Apple's usual "use white, and white only, because it becomes iconic" strategy that we've seen since the first days of iPods.
January 24, 2019: AirPods 2 'Hey, Siri' set up hidden in iOS 12.2 beta
Gui Rambo has a way of finding anything and everything hidden inside Apple's betas. Today, that includes the "Hey, Siri" setup screens in iOS 12.2 beta 1.
If Apple has already built out the software, the hardware shouldn't be too far behind.
January 23, 2019: AirPods 2, with health sensors, rumored to be coming soon
From the randomly accurate Digitimes:
If AirPods become the new Apple Watch, what will the Apple Watch become?
AirPods 2: The rumors
Back on September 9, 2017, just a year after the introduction of the first AirPods, Steve Troughton-Smith tweeted a an image he found in a leaked version of the iOS 11 gold master.
…in full, animated glory 😂 pic.twitter.com/dbU6WaU1B4…in full, animated glory 😂 pic.twitter.com/dbU6WaU1B4— Steve Troughton-Smith (@stroughtonsmith) September 9, 2017September 9, 2017
They looked almost exactly the same except for one small but important details: The LED status light was on the outside. It didn't make much sense back then, but it would in just a few days…
At the September 2017 event, Apple not only announced inductive charging for the then-new iPhone 8 and iPhone X, but also for AirPower — see my previous video, linked in the description below — and AirPods courtesy of a new case with… wait for it… the light moved to the outside.
Apple didn't say whether or not new AirPods would come with the new, inductive charging case, but did say the case would be available separately for existing AirPod owners who wanted to upgrade.
MacRumors citing "information reportedly sourced from Apple Switzerland" suggested we'd see the new charging case that December and it would cost $69.
December rolled around with no new AirPods in sight. Then, Kuo Ming-Chi, (via MacRumors, he of the supply chain exfiltration fame, added rumors of new AirPods, not just the new case.
Mark Gurman, writing for Bloomberg on February 22, 2018:
Gurman and Bloomberg returned to AirPods on June 26:
Gurman also added rumors of an expanded product line:
By September of 2018, pretty much everyone seemed to expect the long-awaited inductive charging case at the very least, if not updated AirPods as well, to show up at Apple's annual iPhone event.
Ming-Chi Kuo, via MacRumors:
Mark Gurman, on Twitter
What to expect on Wednesday: iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr + New Apple Watch and new AirPods/AirPower https://t.co/IrDQCVJTX4What to expect on Wednesday: iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr + New Apple Watch and new AirPods/AirPower https://t.co/IrDQCVJTX4— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) September 10, 2018September 10, 2018
But, of course, that was not to be.
Kuo Ming-Chi on December 2, via MacRumors:
And again on December 5, also via MacRumors
Also on December 5, MySmartPrice noticed updated AirPods model numbers in the Bluetooth database:
AirPods 2: The potential
Beyond the inductive charging case that Apple has already announced and we'll presumably see sometime in the New Year, there are a few features that really stand out when it comes to making AirPods really next gen.
Liquid ingress protection, which usually gets simplified to water resistance but in this case really needs to cover everything from rain to sweat, would not only prevent AirPods from being damaged due to weather but due to all the hardcore workouts they often get put through every day. Those don't often kill AirPods immediately but will over time.
More sophisticated controls are also high on many people's lists. Apple has already added different options for the accelerometer tap on existing AirPods, and let you split the the controls so tapping one AirPod can do something different than tapping the other.
You can't control volume yet, though. But, if Apple could add a capacitive layer to the circumference, similar to what was just added to Apple Pencil 2 to switch tools, then maybe you could swipe up to increase and swipe down to decrease volume, and it would be one less reason to reach for your Watch or iPhone any more.
The ability to fit more and varied ears has also come up often. Even though Jony Ive and his team found a way to fit most ears, most of the time, that still leaves some people out. And, at the scale of Apple products, even a small percentage translates into a lot.
My own ears have been mangled by a decade of Brazilian jiu-jitsu, so while the left one fits perfectly, the right one is always a little looser. I don't know if Apple could tweak the shape or the material to hit an even wider range of people, or if it could go to or offer an in-ear alternative for those who really need it, but something. Because AirPods really should be for everyone.
The accessibility benefits alone, from guided walking to full on audio augmented reality are going to demand it soon anyway. Especially if AirPods get into computational 3D audio, so sound can be placed in space, both for mundane things like directions and tours and spectacular things like gaming and entertainment.
Also, of course, color. Especially in the age of iPhone XR where blue, red, yellow, and coral are the new black. Apple seems to think white is iconic when it comes to its audio accessories, going all the way back to the original iPod, but as any Watch lover will tell you, we now live in an age of technology-as-fashion and white isn't always going to be right, certainly not for everyone and absolutely not all of the time.
Maybe higher-end AirPods in silver and space gray, and new entry-level AirPods in all the XR colors?
On-board Hey Siri. You always have to be cautious when it comes to tiny batteries and always-on features, but moving the trigger word from the iPhone's A-series to the AirPods W-series would likely boost performance enough to warrant it.
Over time, maybe the connection to Siri servers could move as well. That way, like Apple Watch, any time AirPods detect a Wi-Fi network they already know via iPhone, they could just send the query immediately. Of course, that kind of connectivity also opens AirPods up to on-device Apple Music, Podcasts, and Audio Books streaming, like Apple Watch.
The batteries are profoundly smaller, so the feature will likely take commensurately longer, but as much as Apple Watch has been called the real next-generation iPod, it's actually AirPods that'll eventually be best suited to that roll.
Basically, near-field versions of the far-field HomePod. Tiny computational audio buds for your ears.
AirPods 2: To be continued...
Apple sold the original AirPods for as close to cost as it could at introduction, giving up on its traditional hefty margins in order to help popularize the technology.
"What? They were too dumb expensive!" I can already imagine a lot of you rage typing into the comments. Well, no. The W1 chip, the sensors, and just getting so much tech into so small a package was "too dumb expensive".
That's why I think a range of AirPods from entry-level to higher end will eventually make sense, including the new over-the-ear headphones Apple is also rumored to be working on, and that I'm not quite so sure will be sold anywhere near cost.
But that's the topic for another day...
Get the best of iMore in your inbox, every day!
Rene Ritchie is one of the most respected Apple analysts in the business, reaching a combined audience of over 40 million readers a month. His YouTube channel, Vector, has over 90 thousand subscribers and 14 million views and his podcasts, including Debug, have been downloaded over 20 million times. He also regularly co-hosts MacBreak Weekly for the TWiT network and co-hosted CES Live! and Talk Mobile. Based in Montreal, Rene is a former director of product marketing, web developer, and graphic designer. He's authored several books and appeared on numerous television and radio segments to discuss Apple and the technology industry. When not working, he likes to cook, grapple, and spend time with his friends and family.
Why aren't the videos of these articles on iMore youtube channel ? Unless Rene Ritchie owns iMore then I understand.
"and people got a taste of the freedom that came from no longer having strings to hold them down...." Freedom from what? Far superior sound? Not having to worry about losing an earbud or the batteries dying? Freedom to be nickled and dimed by Apple charging $70 as opposed to $5 or $10? Lol. Only you would think this is a useful product Rene
I'm right with you. It pains me how hard Apple tries to deliberately antagonize their own customers, making each iteration of a given device less useful than before, and calling THAT innovation. Having to constantly charge headphones is bad enough, but when you can only get a few hours at a time out of those tiny batteries, and there's a huge risk of losing one, "truly wireless" is not a feature, it's just a dumb design decision. Almost as dumb as removing the universal standard audio jack.
The headphone jack removal makes sense if it's being replaced by a USB-C slot, like on the new iPad Pro. I'm hoping USB-C will come to the next iPhone. Apple's accessories don't always meet the quality you to come to see with their mainstream products, but there are other wireless earphones with a longer battery life.
Freedom from tangled wires, freedom from the wires tugging on something and being pulled out from your ear, auto-pairing with your phone rather than having to constantly plug them in and out. The quality of the sound compared to Apple's wired EarPods is trivial, if you want better quality, you can get better quality wireless headphones. Lol. Only you would think this isn't a useful product Narthalus. They've sold like hotcakes during the festive season, so there's not much more to say really.
Autoparing? Lol. You don't need to auto-pair when you have a headphone jack - you plug in and go (which isn't at all as hard as you insinuate). With bluetooth you get dropped connections/dc's and the sound comparability ISN'T trivial Danny despite what you believe. Please point me to where they've "sold like hotcakes" and I'll retract what I've said.
Yep autopairing. Open the case and they pair. I don't have to pull them out of my pocket, untangle the wire and hope I don't flip them out of my ears maybe taking the phone with them as they fall to the ground.
And man I can’t tell you how many times these have desync from all my devices, or how I need to reboot my phone sometimes to get them to work again. And what the **** gives with one AirPod dying quicker than the other one??
Batteries aren't all created equal, one will naturally die slightly quicker than the other. I can't speak for the other issues, other than making sure you're on the latest version of iOS. Try speaking to Apple if you continue having issues.
Going up to an old TV to change the channel isn't hard, but it's still easier with a TV remote, which was what I was "insinuating". You don't always get dropped connections with Bluetooth, that depends on a lot of factors but if it really happened as often as you suggest, Apple wouldn't sell AirPods, or would have them connect via another method. Also, if you read what I actually said, I said the difference between Apple AirPods and Apple EarPods (wired) sound quality is trivial. If you get a high quality pair of wired headphones, and a high quality pair of wireless headphones, then you will see a greater difference, but even still this may be more relevant to the audiophile. As for the sales: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/03/apple-will-launch-new-airpods-in-2019-sa... "Kuo, who has a track record of accurately predicting Apple product launches, said AirPods are Apple’s most popular accessory ever. In the note, Kuo said Apple AirPods have the fastest growth momentum of any Apple product."
You should try a pair before condemning them. They work great with both iOS and Android. They sound good and are very light not to mention very good BT distance.
I just put my money where my mouth was and went back to a dedicated portable audio player again. Sure, it needs charging as well, but since the one I got also works as a DAC when plugged into a desktop computer (MacOS, Linux, Windows compatible) and can charge while at it, it's painless. Also has bluetooth so I can stream stuff from the iPhone to it if I'm feeling like listening to mediocre audio quality. Outside the iPhone (because Android is garbage and there aren't any other alternatives), I don't see myself getting another Apple product again in the near future. I'll be keeping my latency-free wired connections for portable audio and will go back to used Thinkpads/Dells with Linux for home desktop computing needs. Also more than happy with my old Tudor and G-Shock; former is more elegant than any Apple Watch version, while that later never has to be charged or connected thanks to solar charging and atomic syncing. Cigarettes and alcohol round off my health tracking needs. Back to basics. Don't have to make a jackass more money than they deserve. Happy days.
If they have inductive charging I hope they also keep the Lightning charging as I don't want an space hogging, typically ugly, pad to charge it. Lightning cables take less space and can charge my iPhone, iPad, Magic Mouse or Trackpad, or Apple Remote. A much better solution than the silly inductive charging pads.
Hopefully people are being hit with big sticks and we will get new Airpods before mine completely lose all battery life. Currently only lasting less than an hour and a half.
These headphones have to be updated. . . . Headphones needing an update like computers. Let that sink in. The headphones simply “just worked” before the AirPods, now they don’t. Let that sink in.
They do "just work" outside of the battery element, and really that's all you can upgrade on it except for the quality of the sound. It would be ok if you could replace the battery yourself, given that batteries naturally degrade over a certain number of charge cycles.
They're degrading a bit too fast in my household. My partner got hers about a year ago they can't even get two hours now. She's also not happy with how her Apple Watch Series 3's battery life has degraded. Makes me cringe whenever I hear all these big tech companies talk about how much they care about the environment when they seem to enjoy making landfill-fodder en masse.
They also need to get rid of the wired headphone look. The current AirPod looks ridiculous. There are many wireless with no stupid wireless “dongle” hanging from your ear.
"In 2016, Apple deleted the 3.5mm headphone jack. Those jerks. But Apple also introduced AirPods. Making them magnificent jerks." Dude...they didn't delete the jack and then just GIVE us AirPods in it's place. They deleted the jack, gave us a flimsy adapter, then released a $160 solution. Lol. We could have had AirPods WITH the 3.5 jack.
You don't have to buy their 160$ solution, I use a 20$ solution from amazon. I got a Xr last fall but before that I used a 5s for 5 years and did not use the headphone jack for the last 2-3. Instead I use a small bluetooth receiver in which I can plug any pair of wired headphones. It works really well too with my Apple watch (I only use my watch when I skate/run/bike/etc).
My over two year-old AirPods barely work. The left one works for about an hour and ten minutes. The right one, only 50 minutes if I'm lucky. No wonder they didn't offer AppleCare for them. Sigh.