RGB lighting and a sleek design

HyperX QuadCast S

Hyperx QuadCast S

A bit cheaper with most of the same functionality

Blue Yeti

Blue Yeti

The HyperX QuadCast S looks gorgeous on your desk or video if you're streaming, and the gain control and mute button are a lot easier to use while recording. While the Mac can't take full advantage of all its features due to software limitations, the built-in pop filter and shock mount are super useful.

$160 at Amazon

Pros

  • Beautiful RGB lighting
  • Four polar patterns
  • Great clear audio
  • A sleeker design

Cons

  • Not all features are available on Mac
  • More expensive

The big Blue Yeti has long been a great USB microphone for Mac, and even though it's older and uses a micro-USB connection, it still offers a lot for its price.

$110 at Amazon

Pros

  • Sturdy metal design
  • Four polar patterns
  • Great clear audio
  • Cheaper

Cons

  • No built-in pop filter
  • No shock mount

The HyperX QuadCast S and the Blue Yeti have the same four polar patterns for recording, cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional and record audio at the same sample rate of 48 kHz/16-bit. That means both microphones will be just as versatile for recording in multiple situations. However, the QuadCast S does come with a built-in pop filter and shock mount, which does help minimize some background noise on a hot mic. So, which one should you get? Let's dive in.

HyperX QuadCast S vs. Blue Yeti: The specs

The Blue Yeti has been on top of mind for many people as the best USB microphone for Mac for years now. When it comes to plug-and-play microphones, it's hard to find something that offers the same versatility at the same price. While the QuadCast S is more expensive than the Blue Yeti, it offers a lot of the same functionality and comes with a few extras that make it a compelling package.

HyperX QuadCast S Blue Yeti
Price $110 $160
Connection microUSB USB-C
Sample rate 48kHz 48kHz
Bit rate 16-bit 16-bit
Polar patterns cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional cardioid, stereo, bidirectional, and omnidirectional
Condensers Three 14mm condensers three 14mm condensers
Compatible with mic stands Yes Yes
Weight (with stand) ‎1.32 lbs 2.2 lbs
Pop filter Built-in Add-on
Shock Mount Built-in Add-on

As someone who has used both microphones, I prefer the QuadCast S from a usability standpoint. While both the Yeti and the QuadCast S have gain control and a mute button, the HyperX microphone just handles it much better. Let's break it down a little more.

HyperX QuadCast S vs. Blue Yeti: It mostly comes down to function

Hyperx Quadcast S Vs Blue YetiSource: Luke Flipowicz / iMore

The gain control on the Blue Yeti is a knob located at the back of the microphone, so if you're trying to adjust your gain on the fly, you have to reach around the microphone. Not only is this awkward to do, but it usually results in a bit of noise on the recording. The same goes with the mute button. It's on the front of the Blue Yeti, but it's a clickable little button that always creates a little pop while you're recording.

One thing the Blue Yeti does have going for it is it's fully compatible with Mac.

The QuadCast S, on the other hand, has a nice smooth-turning knob for the gain control located at the bottom of the microphone that's easily accessible. While testing, I found it very easy to adjust the gain without creating much noise on the hot mic. The mute button is a touch button right on top of the device that takes a very slight tap to activate. You might hear a very slight disturbance in your recording, but once again, if you're careful, you can use the mute button without making any noise on the hot mic.

One thing the Blue Yeti does have going for it is it's fully compatible with Mac, whereas the QuadCast S is missing some features because it doesn't have Mac-compatible software. It's not missing anything super important, but without the software HyperX makes, you won't be able to customize the RGB lighting or use any of its custom effects. This likely shouldn't be a deal-breaker for most people, but you will get a little more out of it when it connects to a Windows computer.

HyperX QuadCast S vs. Blue Yeti: Which should you buy?

Blue iMac (2021) Photo EditingSource: Luke Filipowicz / iMore

It may look like the price is the determining factor for two microphones that record equally well and have the same polar patterns, but looks can be deceiving.

The Blue Yeti is older, and its price tends to fluctuate more, meaning you can often find it between $110 - $130, but you may see it go even as low as $90 sometimes, but it doesn't come with a pop filter, or shock mount like the QuadCast S does. While the shock mount may not be necessary if you just plan on using the Blue Yeti on your desk in its stand, the pop filter certainly makes a difference. Plus, the Blue Yeti connects via micro-USB. To use it with a more recent Mac, you definitely need a dongle or a good USB-C hub.

When you combine the fact that the QuadCast S is a tad easier to use, uses a USB-C connection, has a more compact and stylish design, and has a built-in pop filter and shock mount, I think it more than justifies its $160 price.

Stylish and versatile

Hyperx QuadCast S

HyperX QuadCast S

A USB microphone with great usability

While you can't customize the RGB lighting on the Mac, the four polar patterns, the excellent sound quality, and the inclusion of the pop filter and shock mount included with the microphone make for a really pleasant experience regardless of how you use it.

An oldie, but a goodie

Blue Yeti

Blue Yeti

Sounds just as great for less

It may be a bit bulky and less stylish, but the Blue Yeti still records fantastic audio. It's just as versatile, and if you can snag it at a lower price, it offers great value to any Mac user.

We may earn a commission for purchases using our links. Learn more.