ebooks case | iMore

Give me some space!

Turn your Nintendo Switch into the ultimate console with a microSD card!

A closer look

Everything you need to know about the AT&T Unlimited plan

Users Guide

The third public beta for iOS 10.3 is here! This is how you get it

User Guide

Apple releases third public beta of macOS Sierra 10.12.4

iMore Offers

Get a lifetime of unlimited mobile backup from iDrive for $19.99

Beta time!

Apple releases third developer beta of iOS 10.3

Everything you need to know!

iPhone 8 will reportedly feature 3D-sensing FaceTime camera

Developers only!

tvOS 10.2 beta 3 now ready for developers

Developers only!

Apple releases third beta of watchOS 3.2 to developers

What you need to know

Four new iPad Pro models could be coming in March

Enter now!

We're giving away the new full-grain leather slim wallets from Pad & Quill

From 'OW' to 'WOW'

Hi, I'm an iPad Pro! β€” 'We hear you' brings classic feel to new ads

Touch ID for all!

Why Touch ID makes the MacBook Pro the best Mac ever

🐣 + 🍍 + πŸ’Ž = πŸ‰

PokΓ©mon Go Gen 2 Guide β€” New info!

Click. Swoon.

Billboard's cover: Shot on iPhone 7 Plus Portrait Mode

bye bye birdie

How to delete your Twitter account 🚫πŸ₯


Nintendo Switch FAQ: Everything you need to know!

iOS Gaming Weekly

Here are the best new iPhone games out and on sale now!

Mastering AirPods

How to use your AirPods when you're offline


Why you might (and might not) want an indoor security camera in your home

< >

Order: BeatsX | AirPods | MacBook Pro | Order iPhone 7: Apple | Verizon | T-Mobile

ebooks case

iBooks anti-trust monitor once again under fire for antics, billings

Michael Bromwich, appointed by U.S. Judge Denise Cote in the wake of the anti-trust charges leveled against Apple for iBooks deals, is once again under fire in the op ed pages of a prominent publication. This time it's the Wall Street Journal, but the accusation remains the same β€” that Bromwich abused his role by investigating aspects of the company that have nothing to do with the case, and in the process has billed Apple over $2.65 million for his "services".

More →

Apple finds sympathetic judicial ears in e-book appeal

Apple's arguments in its appeal for the e-book antitrust case have found sympathetic judicial ears. After having lost the case under U.S. District Judge Denise Cote last year, Apple's appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York seems to be going well, with judges asking questions that seemingly favor Apple's position in the case.

More →

Apple settles ebook price-fixing trial outside the courts

Apple has come to an agreement outside the courts to close an antitrust lawsuit, which alleges the company conspired with publishers to inflate ebook pricing for iPhone and iPad owners. The lawsuit was brought forward by 33 US states and by avoiding the upcoming trial on July 14, Apple has avoided a potential payout of $840 million in damages.

More →

With iBooks tied up by courts, Amazon runs roughshod over publishers

When the U.S. government sued Apple over its entry into the ebooks market there was a fear that the action would result in Amazon, who already enjoyed a dominant market position, increasing their power to potentially abusive levels. So, was that fear justified?

More →

Apple brings out the big guns in ebooks case β€” economists!

Despite a series of events that would be better suited for a David E. Kelly legal comedy than an actual court of law, Apple is still fighting on in their ebook case, and this time bringing in some economists as backup, namely Bradford Cornell of CalTech and Janusz Ordover of NYU. The goal seems to be to better explain to the court why, according to Apple, they don't understand the market and are getting it all wrong.

More →

Apple formally appeals ebook antitrust ruling - does it stand a chance?

Apple on Tuesday filed paperwork with the New York federal court to appeal a 2013 ruling that found the company in violation of antitrust laws regarding its iBooks publishing arrangements with major book publishers.

More →

Apple really doesn't like their antitrust monitor; attempts to put his work on hold

Apple is once again asking a federal appeals court to grant a stay on the work of court-appointed antitrust monitor, Michael Bromwich. While a temporary reprieve was granted two weeks ago, Apple hopes that the court will put Bromwich's work on hold until its decided whether or not he should have been placed at Apple to begin with

More →

Apple gets temporary reprieve from external antitrust monitor; should it be a permanent one?

Apple has been temporarily spared the presence of an external antitrust monitor, initially placed at the company as part of the judgment in the U.S. government's case against Apple regarding ebooks. Apple has been fighting to remove the monitor, Michael Bromwich, since he was placed at the company last summer. The company believes that Bromwich is a disruptive and unnecessary imposition, according to Reuters:

More →

How anti-Apple, pro-Amazon manipulations have resulted in less competition, higher ebook prices

Sometimes when there's smoke, there's just smoke. And sometimes there are Kindles full of fire. Following the Wall Street Journal's scathing opinion piece last month, another media outlet is now asking questions about the conduct of the Department of Justice, the judge, and the external monitor. Kathleen Sharp goes so far as to call Amazon's crusade "bogus" in her headline on Slate:

More →

Apple ebook bench called out as 'offensive to the rule of law and a disgrace to the judiciary'

The Wall Street Journal began the year making me wonder if they'd thrown journalistic integrity out the window in an effort to ride the Apple is Doomed train into clickbait history, and now they're ending it with about as pro an Apple editorial as possible. In the piece, which appears without byline, the WSJ calls Judge Denise Cote "abusive" and the special prosecutor a "friend" who is "besieging" Apple in an arrangement that's "flatly unconstitutional". And that's not the worst of it:

More →