A lot of smart home products have popped up over the last few years, one of the most popular being smart security cameras and video doorbells. Amazon-owned Ring has been one of the top players in these niches for a few years, but if you've purchased any of the company's products in the past, you may want to consider unplugging them and getting something else.
The Intercept published a report on Thursday, January 10, and in the report, it's said that Ring employees at the company's Ukraine research center have been able to view video footage from customers' cameras and doorbells with nothing more than an email address.
This all started back in 2016, with the report reading as follows:
All of the videos were reportedly left unencrypted, which Ring's execs justified because "encryption would make the company less valuable." Furthermore, Ring employees were given data that connected video files with specific customers.
The report continues:
A Ring spokesperson responded shortly after this story broke, saying:
So, why did Ring give its employees access to all this information in the first place?
According to The Intercept, at least part of it was a result of Ring's facial and object recognition system not being as good as the company wanted. By giving this data to employees, the goal was to improve the software to be better at accurately determining what the cameras were seeing.
Ring supposedly began to be stricter about this practice with its Ukraine employees following a visit from Amazon in May 2018, but that "staffers in Ukraine worked around the controls."
So, what should you do if you have a Ring camera?
Whether or not your own a Ring product now, does this change your thought of the company as a whole? Let us know in the comments below.
When Joe isn't acting as the News Editor for Android Central, he can be found helping out with articles here and there at iMore. He was last spotted at Starbucks surrounded by peppermint mochas. Have a tip? Send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org!
I have no idea who Intercept is or how to gauge their credibility (Or the article). Obviously the claims made are quite troubling, if true. I own a Ring doorbell so, watching my dog set off the alarm is probably not worthy of concern😳😳. Nevertheless, privacy is always a concern.
I had the original Ring which barely worked. After many attempts to get satisfaction, they finally replaced it after many months with the next generation—that was crap, too, and I just left it installed (but not on) as a decoy. Wouldn’t try again after evil Amazon bought them, just like I’d never use Nest by evil google. It’s just common sense unless you don’t care about privacy.
It depends how much you care about privacy. I care about it, but not to the degree that I'm going to worry about Alexa recording my conversations, or a doorbell looking at what's outside my front door. Big companies have been collecting all sorts of data from me from when I started using the internet and even before that, it's not right, but at the same time it hasn't caused me any harm. The main thing for me is to keep sensitive data private, which is what I do.
Google Home and Amazon Echo is always listening to our conversations; our carrier sells our location data for as little as $8 and some change; and now, Amazon employees can view your cameras based on your email address. Congress needs to come up with privacy laws to protect all of us, from government AND private corporations. I refuse to use any smart home products until I know my privacy is guaranteed.
You guys just need to catch up with Europe, we have GDPR for that.
Sadly with a lot of these cloud services you don't really know what's happening with your data. I know you can set up video cameras without the use of a cloud service, so there's probably something similar for video doorbells.
Get the best of iMore in in your inbox, every day!
Thank you for signing up to iMore. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.