Apple's new subscription service is new no more.
This time last year, I was sitting at this very same iMac I'm typing into now, waiting for the iTunes update that would unleash Apple Music — and Beats 1 — to the world.
Things are a little different in 2016: This June 30, I'm already listening to Apple Music — and wirelessly via my Sonos Play:5. Beats 1 and everything else in the Apple Music ecosystem has been part of my work and driving routine for 12 months now — I've been rocking along with the good, and writing numerous troubleshooting articles about the bad.
For current subscribers, should you continue to subscribe? Newcomers, is Apple Music worth taking another look? Here's my take: one year later.
Apple Music FAQ — all your questions answered!
Apple Music overview
When we talk about Apple Music, we're really talking about a series of services and music options bundled together:
- The Apple Music subscription catalog, which lets you listen on-demand to over 30 million tracks and save them to your devices
- iCloud Music Library, which lets you listen to your Apple Music subscription songs on any device and lets you wirelessly match any songs you own on your Mac to Apple Music's subscription catalog, where they can be streamed on any of your other devices.
- Beats 1 radio service
- Automated radio stations based on artists you pick or pre-set options
- Apple's For You, which picks human-curated playlists based on your likes and dislikes
- Apple's New section, which recommends new music service-wide, and also contains all of the human-created playlists Apple Music employees have created
- Apple's Connect, which lets artists post life snippets and unreleased music to their fans
Each of these sections has its pros and cons, which we'll talk about below, but it's important to recognize that Apple Music's flaws are very much a sum of its disparate parts.
Apple Music's subscription catalog, and the secret Siri sauce making it great
When it comes to Apple's collection of music available for streaming, I've been consistently impressed throughout the last year. No, the company wasn't able to get Lemonade on streaming — but it's made up for that with dynamite exclusives (see Taylor Swift's entire catalog, and the 1989 World Tour video) and smart integration with iTunes for the few tracks and albums it can't play.
But that's true for Google Play Music, as well, and Spotify can certainly rival Apple's streaming collection. What makes Apple Music worth it, or — dare I say — better in this arena?
I'm going to take exclusives off the table: Everyone in the streaming industry has some. At the end of the day, you're going to choose the streaming service that has the songs you want to listen to — sometimes Apple Music has won that war, and sometimes it hasn't. That said, Apple does have a ridiculous amount of cash in the bank to bankroll its artist initiative, and appears to be focusing heavily on that area. How that affects its must-listen catalog in the future remains to be seen; for now, the streaming services rank about equally in their exclusive access to certain artists.
What really sets Apple apart from its rivals is the iOS device integration — and with that, Siri. When macOS Sierra launches this fall, every major Apple hardware device will have systemwide voice access to the company's music catalog, which means finding a song is as simple as asking Siri to play it for you.
Not everyone is going to love — or even use — this feature, but for those that do, it's one of the best things going for Apple and Siri. Amazon's Echo lets you do this with its own Prime catalog and Spotify, but it's restricted to your living room; Siri and Apple Music conquer in the car, when you'd prefer to avoid tapping buttons or looking at a multitude of playlists on your screen.
There are places for Siri and Apple Music's catalog to improve: Searching for playlists with your voice is still an errant pain, as is trying to get the voice assistant to recognize strange band names (The Decemberists, no matter how many times I queue them, will always register in Siri as "December ish"). But a year in, the subscription catalog is a strong argument for paying that $9.99 a month.
Beats 1 and automated radio
I've said this a lot over the past year, and I'll say it again: Beats 1 is the hidden gem of Apple Music.
For people who aren't huge fans of the day-to-day Beats 1 listening experience, the artist shows are where you need to go.
I'm not referring to the live stream, though I greatly enjoy Zane Lowe's noon to 2PM ET show. As much as the "live in 100 countries" aspect is a touted feature of the service, it's more a gimmick than anything else. That's not to say it's completely useless: One of my favorite Beats 1 moments this year was the station's all-day Prince-themed playfest after the singer passed away at Paisley Park on April 21, and I know several music nerds who really love the station's on-air exclusives.
There's also something to be said about the live stream being one of the few Apple Music features you can access outside of a subscription — it's truly a teaser for the subscription experience.
But where Beats 1 shines isn't on-air with Zane Lowe, Julie Adenuga, Ebro Darden, or any of the local anchors — it's all about the artist-driven programming. Elton John. Drake. Pharrell Williams. Skrillex. HAIM. St Vincent. Joshua Homme.
These folks have all been on Beats 1 live, but you've likely only ever heard them if you listen early in the morning, late at night, or on weekends. That's when Beats 1 hosts its "primetime" programming, inviting artists from all over the world and music sphere to record shows. It's a musical experiment at a scale unlike any I've ever really seen, and one year in, Beats 1 seems committed to starting new shows and making sure its hosts have the tools they need to make some stellar stuff.
For people who aren't huge fans of the day-to-day Beats 1 listening experience, the artist shows are where you need to go. Some are comedy-driven or interview-centric, and feel almost like podcasts, save for the occasional scattering of high-quality musical content. Others are truly artists-as-DJs. Elton John's show has remained one of the high points of my Beats 1 listening experience; his shows follow loose musical themes, but the singer/songwriter highlights work from all across the map and soundscape, weaving it into a beautiful one-hour show that's become one of my must-listens every week.
Better still, Apple now has the music rights to host all of them on-demand behind the Apple Music paywall. There have been music-themed podcasts in the past on the iTunes Store, of course, but these shows dance that line, exploring what it means to have a show that's part music discovery, part conversation. (And all the music played in the show is tagged in the Apple Music catalog, so you can Like it and send it to a playlist or your Music Library.)
You now have a year of phenomenal content to explore. Go. (Some picks to get you started: The Alligator Hour with Josh Homme, St Vincent's Mixtape Delivery Service, One Mix, Start Making Sense with Jehnny Beth, and A Series of Bleeps with Corey Taylor.)
Also living in the Radio tab are Apple's computer-automated radio stations, once known as iTunes Radio. There's a smattering of pre-made featured stations, including ones like Pure Pop, but you can also choose from 3-6 stations in each genre, or create a station yourself based a song in your library or in Apple Music. It's very Pandora-esque, at times, though I admit I really haven't taken advantage of this feature very often in the last year; I find myself drawn much more to the live or on-demand radio offerings with actual anchors.
If Beats 1 is the hidden gem of Apple Music and the subscription catalog is the base setting, For You is its crown jewel. It's the guiding message of the service: People and algorithms can work in tandem to put together music that speaks to your soul.
For You, like many parts of Apple Music, is split into multiple parts: It comprises all of the hand-built playlists in the Apple Music service and the algorithms that recommends which playlists and albums you should listen to today.
The playlists are gold, as they have been since their early Beats Music days. Apple brought over Beats Music's ace curation team and hired some smart additions, and even if I run across a playlist that doesn't suit me, I can still appreciate how they've been put together.
For You... has hits and misses. It calibrates off the music and artist bubbles you pick when you first set up the service, and then further tweaks based on what you've listened to lately from your library and other playlists and what you Like or Dislike when listening to music.
That can create delight when you get served a playlist about Andrews Sisters influences after going on a 1940s kick in your library, but it can also lead to some odd recommendations — I listened to a few electronic songs for a friend's project, after which my For You playlists contained nothing but electronica for a solid two days.
If Beats 1 is the hidden gem of Apple Music and the subscription catalog is the base setting, For You is its crown jewel.
For You also has had issues with recommending playlists that have misguided names like "Essentials" or "Get Started with..." if you're a huge fan of that band. They still contain a great assortment of tracks, but the name turns people off — "Shouldn't you know I'm a fan of this band and give me Deep Cuts, or something?"
My biggest frustration, though, has been rediscoverability: Much like the Like feature on songs, unless you save a playlist to your library, it can disappear into the mists, never to be seen again unless you remember the specific name of the playlist.
A year in, For You isn't perfect, but it's almost exclusively where I go to listen to Apple Music tracks outside of Beats 1 or Siri.
Of course, in iOS 10, all of this has changed dramatically: The For You section has been completely overhauled, and has been broken up into a number of sections focused on types of curated content.
There's a Recently Played section for playlists (yes!), a daily set of playlists recommendations tailored to your tastes along with a Spotify-inspired New Music Mix of new music you might like, a section that notes which playlists you've listened to most often, an assortment of albums, and a specific section just for artist-based playlists.
These changes dramatically improve the For You experience for both average users and music junkies.
iCloud Music Library is working on its flaws
In theory, iCloud Music Library is a wonderful idea. Let users access their tracks from anywhere! Let users download Apple Music tracks and playlists they love! Manage users' iOS on-device libraries so they never run out of space! And have that all happen wirelessly and behind the scenes so users never have to worry about fiddling with settings!
Here's the thing: When it comes to music collections, users care about fiddly settings. They care about intermingling their own libraries and Apple Music. They certainly care about what songs stay on their iPhone and what ones vanish into the mists right before a trip without Wi-Fi. And they care the most if weird bugs make it look like their library has vanished or been replaced with DRM files.
Apple tried to do a great thing with iCloud Music Library. Where it fell apart, as I've written many a time before, is in the execution.
Apple Music tracks have DRM on them, because no, you can't download a song from a subscription service and expect it to stay on your hard drive after you cancel that service. Common sense.
Where it got complicated is when your own tracks come into the mix. When this review was written, Apple was still insisting on matching your local tracks to DRM-laden Apple Music tracks, rather than DRM-free iTunes Store songs. Since that time, the company has changed its tune, and all Apple Music subscribers will now get the same kind of DRM-free matching experience as those with an iTunes Match subscription. It essentially makes the two services identical when it comes to iCloud Music Library and your local tracks, which is a huge improvement.
I'm still not convinced that Apple's matching algorithm shouldn't just go away altogether, especially considering the still-frustrating problems with live tracks matching to studio versions, or messing up album artwork and metadata. Sure, it would cost more storage space, but it might just be worth it.
Apple tried to do a great thing with iCloud Music Library. Where it fell apart, as I've written many a time before, is in the execution.
And Apple has addressed other pain points with iOS 10: You can now easily toggle off Apple Music or iCloud Music Library, turn off optimized storage (which automatically deletes music from your library when your storage space is low), and even avoid having songs from Apple Music playlists wind up mixed in with the rest of your music.
But of the Apple Music component services, iCloud Music Library has caused me some of the biggest grief this year — despite never personally having problems with it. (I don't have rare live albums, and always back up my music.) But in the year since Apple Music's release, I've written somewhere in the realm of 50,000 words on troubleshooting iCloud Music Library alone.
The biggest problems I (and other users) have run into have been fixed, and while there are still issues, they're not serious enough for me to recommend swearing off Apple Music as-is. If you really hate iCloud Music Library, you can always use Apple Music without the cloud locker enabled, though you won't be able to save tracks to your devices, or create a second library for your rare live stuff you don't want to see accidentally matched to the wrong versions.
Thanks for the improvements, Apple. Now if only the company would implement a "force-upload" option for live tracks...
New, Connect, and Search miscellany
As we round out the Apple Music bundle tour, we've got Apple's two music discovery mechanisms and its second misguided iteration of a musical social network.
New is great if you're someone who wants to keep tabs on the latest and greatest happening in the music scene; I, unfortunately, am not that person. (I will give the section props, though, for letting me discover that new Garbage, Radiohead, and Tegan and Sara albums had arrived — all in the same week! — and gave me an easy way to listen to all of them.)
New's current problem, one year in, is in its clutter. There's just way too much stuff: new songs, new albums, new artists, top charts, Beats 1 on demand, videos, featured brand curators — not to mention it also being where all of Apple's other curated playlists live when not being served via For You. It's a headache of a screen.
The good news is, most of that has been simplified with Apple's fall OS releases: New has become Browse, and each subsection — New Music, Curated Playlists, Top Charts, and Genres — will be separated into its own area, with a single banner rotation at the top that recommends a few new albums, playlists, and featured artists. It's a badly-needed fix if Apple actually wants people to use the section to find new music outside of their current interests.
Connect... I don't know what I can really say about Apple's second attempt at social networking in music, other than it's certainly an attempt. Airplane Mode's Dave Wiskus has a much more concise overview of Connect's problems, but in short: It's difficult to upload content, follower information is opaque, the commenting system is frustrating, and it's Yet Another Social Media network to check.
With iOS 10 and macOS Sierra, Connect has been folded into For You — showing you info from artists you follow in sections, rather than its own separate tab. I'm not sure if that improves things on the artist end, but it's certainly a better interface for users.
Now, if Apple would just add the ability to follow average users and subscribe to their live-updating playlists...
After twelve months of living with Apple Music, it's become a fixture in my house. It's a fixture that needs some rewiring — especially where cloud services is concerned — but there's an operating system electrician coming this fall that promises to fix a lot of the issues.
Even with Apple Music's flaws, I wouldn't consider giving it up for another streaming service — especially with the knowledge of what's coming this fall. Siri integration, Beats 1's on-demand catalog, and For You playlists make the service what it is. iCloud Music Library isn't perfect, no, but it's just one part of the big Apple Music picture.
There are other great music subscription services out there. Spotify is aces at introducing you to new music and providing a great framework for sharing playlists, and Apple certainly struggles with that. Google Play Music has excellent Android integration, and it allows you to upload your music to a locker, separating it from your main iTunes catalog.
Those are areas for Apple Music to improve upon, to be sure. For now, the service remains focused on immersing you in music culture and the musicians themselves — and Apple shows every indication of continuing to build upon that mission.
If that's something you can get behind, Apple Music is well-worth its $9.99 (or $14.99 for a family) subscription. I'm not stopping mine any time soon.