Apple outlines how it handles law enforcement data requests

Apple law enforcement data requests

Apple has published a new set of guidelines that detail how government entities and law enforcement agencies can request user data, and what information the company can and cannot retrieve upon receipt of a search warrant or legal notice. The guidelines state that Apple will start notifying its customers when it receives law enforcement data requests.

Apple will notify its customers when their personal information is being sought in response to legal process except where providing notice is prohibited by the legal process itself, by a court order Apple receives (e.g., an order under 18 U.S.C. §2705(b)), or by applicable law or where Apple, in its sole discretion, believes that providing notice could create a risk of injury or death to an identifiable individual or group of individuals or in situations where the case relates to child endangerment.

With regards to data extraction, Apple mentions that it can retrieve information from passcode-locked devices, but that data gathering is limited to its native apps such as SMS, photos, videos, contacts, audio recording, and call history. Apple stated that it would not be able to provide access to email, calendar entries or third-party app data, and that the extraction process can be performed on devices "in good working order" at its headquarters. However, when served with a federal wiretap order, Apple will be able to intercept a users' email communications, but not iMessage or FaceTime communications, as they are encrypted.

Apple's changes are indicative of a broader change that is being implemented across major technology giants like Google, Microsoft and Facebook in the way they disclose information to government agencies.

The primary difference here is that Apple, unlike Google and Facebook, doesn't depend on collecting vast amounts of user data to sell advertising against. Apple aggressively tries to keep user data off their servers, even when it means they can't provide otherwise useful services like Google Now's "prescience".

Does that make a difference to you? Does the nature of Apple's business and they way they treat data make you any more likely to trust them and their services?

Source: Apple

9
loading...
0
loading...
59
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Adobe Voice helps iPad users make video stories

Next up →

Debug 35: Scotty on NSConference and RemObjects

There are 9 comments. Add yours.

dalyapp says:

Steve Gibson has pointed out that Apple could intercept your iMessages if they wanted to.

Sent from the iMore App

ehsanshaukat says:

At least we are safe unless and until we do something illegal.
http://www.guidesdiary.com/reject-call-ios-7/

Ides of Buster says:

It does make a difference to me in that the fundamentals of Apple's business is not modeled on an economic imperative to "collect-it-all" and monetize personal information. I'm cool with that.

Making customer data easily accessible at rest on servers or in transit for profit marks Google, Microsoft, and Facebook as easy targets for coercion by the national security state's insatiable desire to sniff without probable cause.

rbreban says:

Report=if your doing something illegal get rid of your smartphone. Buy yourself a disposable phone, change it weekly.

Sent from the iMore App

williamsbh76 says:

+1 see 24 LAD!

Sent from the iMore App

johnnybabble1976 says:

This is a PR doesn't make a difference at all. You are naive if you think apple is any different

infty says:

Is the E-mail that apple can intercept restricted to their iCloud E-mail accounts? Or can they intercept third party E-mail also?

williamsbh76 says:

Good question.

Sent from the iMore App