Editorial

Apple is close to an all-time high and I'm not selling a single share

Editorial

iWatch and trying to predict the market size of mythical products

Editorial

Should Apple consider adding new board members?

Editorial

Was Apple's Beats acquisition really a 'no brainer'?

Editorial

Apple once again speculated to be the first trillion dollar company — here's why

Editorial

Will Apple's hardware focus cause them to fall behind Google and Facebook?

Editorial

Apple raises a bunch more debt to fund its stock buyback program

Editorial

Apple's 7 for 1 stock split: What you need to know!

Editorial

Apple Q2 2014: Wow, were we wrong!

Editorial

How can Apple excite investors beyond Q2 FY14's boring quarterly report?

Editorial

Why all the fuss about the potential end of iPhone subsidies?

Why would Apple raise iPhone prices when all the money is in the mainstream?

Editorial

Does Apple owe it to shareholders to rush out a new product category?

Editorial

Cleanup on aisle 5: Why Apple is making an 8GB iPhone 5c and re-launching the iPad 4

Editorial

Why would Apple business development executives meet with Tesla Motors?

Editorial

Why Apple 'computers' outselling Microsoft may not be fair, but is incredibly important

Editorial

Why Apple is buying back stock faster than promised

Editorial

Q1 2014: Should Wall Street be hating Apple right now?

Editorial

Forget market share, here's a glimpse at Apple's poolside share!

Editorial

Forget the rumored iPad Pro, what 2014 needs is a better Apple TV

Apple reports Q3 and Wall Street freaks out in another display of short term memory

Apple reports Q3 and Wall Street freaks out in another display of short term memory

Last night Apple reported Q3 fiscal 2012 earnings. If you look at some of the headlines floating around, you’d think Apple was in some kind of trouble. Phrases like “iPhone slump” and “big earnings miss” are being tossed around as if the sky is falling on Cupertino.

What a joke. I think this just proves how short term Wall Street’s memory can be. And I’ll get to that in a bit. For now, let’s go through the basic numbers to understand what all the fuss is about.

The numbers

Revenue was $35 billion for the quarter. While this beat Apple’s own guidance, stocks are measured against Wall Street analyst estimates. The average estimate (known as “consensus”) for revenue was $37.2 billion. So that’s a miss as far as any professional investor is concerned.

Earnings per share (EPS) was $9.32 and this was also higher than Apple’s guidance. But again, Wall Street expected $10.36. Another miss.

It’s worth pointing out that Apple’s own guidance is often viewed as ridiculously conservative. I can’t think of too many companies who have a track record of sandbagging their guidance so significantly and consistently.

So is Apple to blame? Not entirely. Let’s look at the breakdown.

iPhone shipments were 26 million, which is a healthy 28% year-over-year (YoY) growth, but lower growth than we’ve seen in the past from Apple. It was also lower than the 29 million units Wall Street thought Apple would sell. My opinion is that analysts didn’t adequately account for the inventory adjustments going on within Apple’s distribution channels. Recall that Apple was supply constrained for quite some time with the iPhone 4S, and delivered some outstanding numbers in the December and March quarters. This was the cool-off quarter where channel inventory declined.

iPad shipments, however, were incredibly strong. Apple sold 17 million tablets in the quarter. This is up from sales of 11.8 million iPads last quarter, and 9.25 million in the year-ago quarter. Talk about growth! iPad is on fire. Numbers were higher than Wall Street expected, and I think this is extremely important for the company. iPads are becoming PC replacements for many customers, and Apple has the killer product everyone wants.

Heck, they just sold over a million of the iPad 2 to the education market last quarter. Most tablet models from other vendors struggle to sell a million TOTAL. This market is growing like crazy, and Apple is dominant.

It’s not worth spending a ton of time on Mac and iPod, especially since these are much smaller contributors to Apple’s financials. But suffice to say that Mac growth of 2% (year over year) is outpacing the PC market, and the iPod is still by far the market leading MP3 player brand. Over 50% of iPod sales are the iPod touch, which runs iOS and helps edge new customers into the Apple ecosystem.

Guidance disappointed Wall Street

Now let’s talk about Apple’s guidance for the upcoming September quarter. Management’s outlook on the upcoming quarter is at least as important to the stock market’s reaction as the current quarterly numbers. And again, Apple provided a more somber outlook that Wall Street wanted.

Revenue is expected to be $34 billion, down only 4% sequentially. But EPS guidance is $7.65, down 18% sequentially. And gross margin? After seeing Apple report over 42% gross margin, analysts are now being told to expect the company to deliver 38.5% margin in September.

This has Wall Street freaking out, and explains why the stock was down more than 5% in after hours trading on Tuesday evening.

But come on ... do we have no ability to look back at last year and notice that we’re watching this play out all over again? Hey Wall Street ... Bill Murray called. He wants his movie role back.

Before I dive into the numbers to show you what I’m talking about, let’s talk about Apple’s September quarter. Two things usually happen during this quarter.

First, it’s the big “back to school” period. Apple gives discounts to students and teachers. Lots of Macs and iOS devices get sold. Margins are lower. That’s life. It happens ever year.

Second, and arguably more important, the September quarter represents the greatest period of iPhone anticipation by customers. Everyone knows the next model is about to be released. Sales slow down, only to hit a new explosive record in the December quarter.

Groundhog Day: Remembering 2011

Last year Apple’s CFO, Peter Oppenheimer, guided Wall Street to expect gross margin of 38% (down 370 basis points), which is even lower than they guided to this year. The explanation? Back to school promos, mix shifts, and the cost of a future product transition. Sound familiar? Thought so.

Of course the gross margin didn’t end up dropping that much. Apple ended up reporting 40.3% and said that the beat came from lower component costs. Easy excuse for Apple to make, right?

Also last year, Oppenheimer guided for EPS to drop a whopping 29% sequentially. That didn’t happen either. Instead of the $5.50 guidance, Apple ended up reporting $7.05 instead. Not so bad.

A couple of differences this year

All of this said, I’m more inclined to believe Apple is guiding closer to the truth this year simply because of the expected rollout of an iPhone 5 which should incorporate many higher-priced components (LTE radio, in-cell display, better processors, bigger battery, etc). Last year’s iPhone 4S launch was not as big of a deal from a cost perspective.

Apple also gave us more reason (than normal) to believe that iPhone sales are slowing due to iPhone 5 anticipation. Oppenheimer specifically said, “Our weekly iPhone sales continue to be impacted by rumors and speculation regarding new products. “

What does this mean to the stock?

Is this a reason to worry about the future of Apple’s stock price? I don’t think so. All it means is that your products are so popular and highly anticipated that they become much very seasonal. As a long term investor, this doesn’t bother me one bit. And it’s a whole lot better than having to worry if new products will be in demand.

Is there an iPad Mini coming?

I guess at this point pretty much everyone is expecting a smaller iPad ... and a smaller price tag. But just how small will the price tag be? Tim Cook gave an interesting answer in response to one of the analyst questions about “price umbrella”.

Here’s what he said:

“We re-priced the iPad 2 to $399, and it did very well in the quarter. The most popular iPad is the new iPad, but iPad 2 did very well. It was particularly a key in the K-12 area that Peter spoke about earlier where we sold about 1 million units for the quarter... and so, we’ve been very aggressive in the space, and I don’t see changing that in terms of competition. We’ve all seen, I think many different tablets, hundreds of them come to market over the last few year. And I have yet to see any of them really gain what I would call any level of traction at all.”

This answer is open to interpretation, isn’t it? Is he saying that Apple is already aggressive (and the only real winner) and doesn’t need to push the envelope any further? Or is he saying that he doesn’t see their aggressiveness waning?

Tell us what you think.

China: Growth or economic risk?

China is another big source of growth for Apple. The iPhone is clearly doing well there, but the new iPad has only hit China last week. It had no impact on the June quarter, as a result. Same goes for the new Macbook Pro with retina display. These are two major products that start helping Chinese growth right now.

However, this is also a source of risk given the macro-economic concerns that the market faces with respect to this Asian giant. The more China starts to represent to Apple, the more risk the company faces in the event of a major adjustment to the country’s economic growth.

Final thoughts

Apple is firing on all cylinders, and we’re heading into another very normal major product transition. As an investor, I’m hanging onto this one.

DISCLOSURE: I like Apples, and I own shares.

Chris Umiastowski

Chris was a sell side financial analyst covering the tech sector for over 10 years. He left the industry to enjoy a change in lifestyle as an entrepreneur, consultant, and technology writer.

More Posts

 

3
loading...
0
loading...
86
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Contest Winners: Twitter Treasure Hunt and Brandnew Boy codes and iTunes gift cards!

Next up →

OS X Mountain Lion now available, and what it means for iOS users

There are 10 comments. Add yours.

SockRolid says:

Re: "This has Wall Street freaking out, and explains why the stock was down more than 5% in after hours trading on Tuesday evening."

Agree. Also, Wall Street will never forget losing all those billions when the dot-com bubble burst. It proved that the smartest guys on Wall Street don't know shit about technology. And if they did, they were blinded by greed and the herd mentality. The recent Facebook IPO fizzle just reinforced their feelings of ignorance and/or incompetence.

So Wall Street, in general, fears the tech sector in general. It's moving too fast for them to fully understand. They can only look to the past, to their Business 101 case studies, try to draw trend lines from the past to the present, then try to extrapolate those lines into the future. Blindly.

The problem is: that was then, this is now, and the next thing is the future. The future that Wall Street can only analyze after it has actually happened.

Hamble says:

Wish I had a 'disappointing' $8.8 billion profit... I really don't know why anyone listens to these so-called analysts.

DevilishBanker says:

Wall Street is run by people who generally act on emotion. It's a typical "act now, think later" mentality. Fortunately, those with half a brain will use this opportunity to buy in today so we should see a generous correction. All is well. Apple is not going out of business.

lungho says:

<Walks into a crowded theater>

FIRE.....FIRE......FIRE!!!!!!

ctt1wbw says:

If only Apple were as successful as LG. LG beat the pants off Apple in the last quarter's earnings announcement.

Carioca32 says:

The truth is that everything can be analysed from different angles. Apple fans will be outraged by this, and think Wall Street is a joke, but the stock market does not care about fanboysm, only about its own predictions and the bottom line. Both have been wrong in the past, but I think its foolish to quote Apple executives like it was the only representation of the truth, since it is clear that Apple consistently underestimate their growth so they can come and claim "above expectation" earnings.

Apple's position is strong, but its growth will not last forever, and its up to the market to try to sense when Apple starts losing momentum. It is foolish to think it will never happen.

andrewshah says:

Just one of the reasons I think these people are literally some of the stupidest people to walk the earth.

xyvex says:

LG beat the pants off Apple?? really? I want to read this cuz it would make my day!

icebox93 says:

In a nutshell, stocks are priced based on earnings, present and future. Earnings outlook is down, therefore stock goes down. Wall Street is acting in the same way it does with every other listed company. It's not emotional, its business. No surpise. Amazing that imore didn't post last night about this, when the obvious reaction was already apparant. Instead, the blog just uncritically presented apples' numbers. Bravo.

And yes the market is incredibly short sighted. But the reaction is no more loony than the irrational exuberance that normally comes out when apple has good news. And as the article points out, apple historically sandbags its numbers, as it did again this quarter, so why is it surprising that anaylsts don't trust their guidance and set their own numbers?