Apple lawyers claim Samsung lawyer's 'jihadist' comparisons are making talks difficult, Samsung says Apple's being difficult


Apple vs. Samsung: The smartphone war summarized


Shocker: Samsung obfuscated dismal tablet sales


Court overrules Samsung's objection to Apple-highlighted video explaining patents to jurors


Apple sanctions Samsung for sharing confidential data, then releases it anyway


Why Lenovo could be a far bigger threat to Samsung than Apple


Jury says Samsung owes Apple another $290 million


Apple vs. Samsung: Secrets allowed!


New survey says 3 times as many Samsung users switch to iPhone than the other way around


The iPhone 4 row continues: South Korea decries 'protectionist' U.S. government


How the ITC ignoring Samsung's FRAND-abuse forced a veto in Apple's favor


Obama administration overrules ITC ban on iPhone 4, iPad 2

Samsung's S Voice likes to think it's Siri

Samsung design video: High on lifestyle companionship, low on rationale for cheap plastics

Hands-on: iPhone 5 vs. Galaxy S4

On the eve of Samsung's Galaxy S4 event, Apple's Phil Schiller repeats that Android is fragmented, lacks integration, offers poor experience


Judge vacates $450 million in damages from Apple vs. Samsung, orders new trial to re-determine amount


UK appellate judge that ruled for Samsung now consults for them

Samsung re-starts copier, announces Passbook for Galaxy devices


Apple's request for import ban on Samsung Galaxy Nexus rejected

< >

Apple vs. Samsung US verdict is in... but we have no idea what it is yet!

Apple vs. Samsung US verdict is in... but we have no idea what it is yet!

According to a sudden flooding of reports, the jury in the Apple vs. Samsung U.S. trial has come to a verdict...

...and we won't find out what that verdict is until later this afternoon.

Yes, just like American Idol, when they tease results and then cut to commercial, all we can do now is wait until later this afternoon, Pacific Time, to find out more.

Both Apple and Samsung have spent weeks in trial, and millions of dollars presenting their case. Apple has claimed Samsung is a copycat writ large, and Samsung has responded vigorously in the negative. Along the way we've seen some interesting iPhone and iPad prototypes, gotten a glimpse at some interesting moments in iPhone and iPad history, seen what Apple originally offered Samsung, and watched executives on both sides not come to any settlements, but mostly just watched the legal system strut and fret its hours upon the courtroom stage.

So grab a tasty snack, pour some spicy drink, and settle in. We'll update with what will likely be the incredibly complex, item by item, device by device, patent by patent verdict as soon as it becomes available.

Have something to say about this story? Share your comments below! Need help with something else? Submit your question!

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, Review, Vector, and MacBreak Weekly podcasts. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

More Posts



← Previously

Follow iMore and Mobile Nations on

Next up →

Apple vs Samsung verdict: Jury finds predominantly for Apple, orders Samsung to pay over $1 billion in damages

Reader comments

Apple vs. Samsung US verdict is in... but we have no idea what it is yet!


Verdict just in........Samsung to pay $1Billion settlement.

But no, they didn't copy Apple. They were just "inspired" by them.

bro their patent is a rectangular shape with rounded edges and being black.... How this was allowed will be shown by the fact apple bribed the patent office with a few million

No, Child, the rectangular shape with rounded corners was included in the trade-dress argument. The patents included the "bounce back" when over-scrolling, pinch to zoom, and double tap to resize. You haven't been following this very closely, have you?

From cnet;

Verdict scorecard:
* Jury finds Samsung infringement of Apple utility, design patents for some (though not all) products
* Jury upholds Apple utility, design patents
* Jury upholds Apple trade dress '983
* Jury finds Samsung "diluted" Apple's registered iPhone, iPhone 3 and "Combination iPhone" trade dress on some products, not on others
* No Apple infringement of Samsung utility patents
* Jury found Samsung violated antitrust law by monopolizing markets related to the UMTS standard

This is my favourite bit so far :
- Jury says Apple patents were willfully infringed by Samsung (5 out of 7 places).
- Jury finds that all of Apple’s patents ARE VALID. LOL
- Damages to Apple $1,051,855,000- LOL
- iPhone 3G, 3GS, and 4, iPad and iPod touch don’t infringe any Samsung patents. LOL