A U.S. appeals court has revived previously-dismissed patent cases which Apple and Motorola Mobility had brought against each other. The cases had originally been consolidated in the Northern Illinois District of the U.S. District Court before being thrown out in June 2012 due to lack of evidence on both sides. Despite reviving Motorola's case, the appeals court ruled that Motorola could not press for a sales ban on Apple's products despite any patent infringement, due to the patent being standards-essential. Apple had been pursuing a case against Motorola Mobility involving the potential infringement of four patents.
According to Reuters:
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had been hearing two cases - one in which Apple accused Motorola Mobility, which was later bought by Google, of infringing four patents. Motorola accused Apple of infringing a standard essential patent, one necessary to making a mobile phone work.
Was the court right to revive these cases, or should they have been left alone? Let us know in the comments below.
Source: Reuters
UAG's Civilian Series cases offer lightweight yet rugged protection
Urban Armor Gear, or UAG, has released a sharp-looking new case. It's feather-light but is designed to absorb and disperse shocks in case you drop your precious iPhone.
Twitter announces new controls for conversations, available globally now
Twitter has announced that it is changing the way conversations work on Twitter, bringing more control to users so as to make Twitter safer and more comfortable.
Apple and Intel file antitrust lawsuit against patent troll
A report suggests that Apple and Intel have filed a lawsuit against Fortress Investment Group, over claims it has acquired patents for the sole purpose of litigating against large tech companies and that it has violated U.S. antitrust laws.
How to change the color on your AirPods or AirPods Pro
Do you need your new AirPods to match your gorgeous (PRODUCT)RED iPhone? Indeed, you've come to the right place.
