The name game: What Apple could call the 7-inch iPad

The name game: What Apple could call the 7-inch iPad

If and when Apple releases a 7.x-inch iPad, what will they call it? What will appear on the keynote slide high above Phil Schiller at the introduction event? What will appear on Apple.com and, more importantly for shoppers, on Apple's online listings and retail store tables?

Internally, for now, Apple might still be calling it "the 7-inch iPad" and be leaving the big branding decisions for closer to launch time. Or maybe they've already decided to call it an iPad mini or something else. Either way, whatever name they choose will influence how the public understand the new device and its place in Apple's lineup, and that's an interesting topic to explore.

We've already covered why Apple would release a 7-inch iPad, how Apple could implement the iPad mini interface, and how Apple could handle the iPad mini display -- Retina or not.

Now let's take a look at what that smaller iPad could be called.

iOS device-style branding

Originally there was the iPhone. As Apple expanded the iOS family of products, they added new brands to round out the line -- iPhone, iPod touch, iPad.

Individual SKUs are further categorized by color and storage size, and other factors -- White iPhone 4S 16GB, black iPad 64GB Wi-Fi + 3G

Apple could do something similar with the 7-inch iPad -- give it an entirely new brand name. iBook has already been taken by the eReader software and service, but Apple could come up with something else for the smaller-screen tablet.

Individual SKUs could then be further categorized by color, storage size, and Wi-Fi vs. Wi-Fi + 4G.

It seems unlikely Apple would further complicate the product mix for a device for which size alone is the only major differentiator.

iPod-style branding

Originally there was the iPod. As Apple expanded the iPod family of products, they kept the iPod brand but added sub-brands to the mix -- iPod shuffle, iPod nano (replaced iPod mini), iPod classic, and iPod touch.

Individual SKUs are further categorized by color and storage size -- Red iPod nano 8GB, white iPod touch 64GB,

Apple could do something similar with the iPad -- iPad and iPad mini.

Individual SKUs could be further categorized by color, storage size, and Wi-Fi vs. Wi-Fi + 4G.

This branding is simple, clean, and fits with Apple's past (iPod mini) and current (Mac mini) brands.

(It's also what Palm used for the TouchPad Go, to differentiate the 7-inch webOS tablet from the 9.7 inch model, though arguably "Go" is a step more obscure than "mini" since portability is function of size.)

MacBook Air-style branding

When Apple introduced the third generation, redesigned MacBook Air, they added a smaller model to the product family. What they didn't do was add another new brand, or sub-brand. There was no MacBook mini or MacBook Air nano.

If and when size is an issue -- when shopping, comparing, looking for support, etc., they're simply referred to as 11-inch MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Air. (Not MacBook Air 11 or MacBook Air 13.)

Like iPods, individual SKUs are further categorized by storage size -- 64GB and 128GB for the 11-inch and 128GB and 256GB for the 13-inch. Other MacBook's are classified by processor quantity or speed, etc. (I'm ignoring build-to-order options since those don't yet apply to iOS devices.)

Apple could do something similar with the iPad -- 7.85-inch iPad and 9.7-inch iPad.

Individual SKUs would still be further categorized by color, storage size, and Wi-Fi vs. Wi-Fi + 4G.

This is superficially simpler, as there remains only one iPad brand, but not as obvious, as inch-measures require more thought than abstractions like "mini" and "not" mini.

Since the MacBook Air is already a sub-brand (of MacBook, alongside MacBook Pro), going with measures keeps the brand from extending out absurdly, the way a Microsoft brand might. Since the iPad isn't a sub-brand of anything (there's no public iOS device super-brand sitting on top of it), going with measures isn't necessary here.

MacBook-style branding

[Update: This section was added after John Gruber of Daring Fireball proposed the idea of an "iPad air".

When Apple introduced their first new laptop in years, they didn't call it a MacBook mini. They called it a MacBook Air.

Originally there was MacBook, MaBook Pro as well. Apple no longer sells the plain MacBook anymore, so now there's just MacBook Pro and MacBook Air.

Air was and is aspirational and symbolic branding. It focused on the thinness and lightness of the new laptop. And that just might be what Apple wants to focus on with the new, thinner, lighter iPad.

iPad Air could do that.

Google tablet-style branding

Google released their small tablet as the Nexus 7. Since there aren't any other sizes (yet?), it's impossible to say with certainty how Google will handle growing the product line, if they ever decide to grow it. However, if there's a Nexus 7 it makes sense a larger tablet would be called the Nexus 10 (or whatever the size ends up being.)

However, the Nexus branding in general is terribly opaque -- Nexus One, Nexus S, Galaxy Nexus, Nexus 7, Nexus Q,

Most of those are phones, one is a tablet, and one is a sound box. Yet there's no way to tell which is which by the names, which is more recent than any other, or what the brand extensions actually mean. (The Nexus S(amsung) is a phone, but the Nexus Q(ueue) is a music box, yet they're both letters, and the letter that comes earlier in the alphabet was released later, and... sigh.)

Because Apple has used naked numbers to designate generations in the past, like iPad 2 and iPhone 4, they can't use the same system to designate screen size without creating confusion. At least not immediately. (An iPad 7 would make consumers wonder how they missed the iPad 4, 5, and 6.)

Apple almost certainly won't go this route.

Samsung tablet-style branding

Samsung's original tablet was the Galaxy Tab. When they added larger models, they incorporated the actual screen size measures into the brand names -- Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 7.7, Galaxy Tab 7.0 Plus (?!), Galaxy Tab 8.9.

When Samsung added new generations of hardware, they added the generation number in as well -- GalaxyTab 2 10.1, Galaxy Tab 2 7.0.

While Apple uses screen size measures in stores and on product information pages -- 21.5-inch iMac, 27-inch iMac, they don't use them as part of the public facing brand.

An iPad 7.85 wouldn't make it into an Apple keynote.

Conclusion

Apple's branding is typically as succinct as Occam's Razor. Earlier this year, they took it a step further and rebranded what would have been the iPad 3 as simply the (new) iPad. While we probably won't see Phil Schiller on stage beneath a slide reading "the small iPad", we probably will see him beneath one reading the 7-inch iPad, or the iPad mini.

Additional resources

Have something to say about this story? Share your comments below! Need help with something else? Submit your question!

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, Review, Vector, and MacBreak Weekly podcasts. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

More Posts

 

78
loading...
0
loading...
88
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

Checkmark for iPhone review

Next up →

iMore Today: 3GS as in Streaming, in-cell-ation, and get outta my FaceTime

Reader comments

The name game: What Apple could call the 7-inch iPad

55 Comments

I think they may go with the iPad (7.85) like the MacBook Air. It's clean and simple and keeps the naming convention they started with the new iPad. Anything would be better than the god awful Samsung branding. Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 just rolls off the tongue.

All you have to do is ask yourself what is smaller and more convenient than a Pad?
The iTampon.
It will easily be marketed towards women as a 7 incher!

I foresee the mini iPad more as an iPod Touch follow on, than a true iPad, and targeted to younger buyers, and on the go gamers (the kind of people that buy an Sony PspVita), so it must be named after the iPod Touch but not as iPod-Thing neither as thing-iPad but some new name, as iBook or iNote ...

If Apple continues the "the (something) product" branding, one might think that they'll go with an adjective that markets and differentiates the product. While the term "small/cheaper" implies inferiority, a term like "portable" is better suited.

Definitely the iPad mini... or... The NEW New iPad! My bets are on the later of the two it sounds brilliant!

i7™
iSeven™
iSe7en™

I've already sent these to Apple. I'd expect them to be approved within the week.

You're still assuming Apple are going to release a smaller iPad of course.... which is not yet a certainty. But if and when they do, there is exactly zero value in looking at what Google and Samsung do with their naming to determine what Apple will do, other than to pad out an article. I'm more interested in what they might call their TV.

Mostly agree, but remember that this is iMore. They're part of "Mobile Nations" so they're obligated to mention the competition every so often. Some things can't be helped.

Also, there will be an iOS news lull for months until the new iPhone is announced, released, unboxed, disassembled, reviewed, Consumer Reported, ad nauseam. The iMore crew needs to do something to keep traffic up in the meantime. Hence the rumor posts, contests, and yes, the "What if..." posts.

When you think about it, there are only a few "big bang" events with actual iOS-related news every year: MWSF, iPad launch, WWDC, iPhone launch. And only three of those are actual Apple events. Plenty of slow news days in between.

Exactly! Android has actual news on actual new products. All we keep hearing about is when this and that is going to come out. Why can't we have multiple phones to choose from? Android is really starting to appeal to me. Splash! Just jumped ship without even realizing it!

The value is simply to reference what other company's do as opposed to Apple with relation to their branding. This obviously is not going to identify exactly what Apple will or wont do. I think calling it fluff/pad is a bit harsh. So you think that the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Rueters, and Gruber are all wrong on this smaller iPad? Who are you waiting on, Dalrymple?

How about the "iNote", I can see the flack-storm over that one going global. I have and use 10 and 7 inch tablets. Its not about price, but utility, once you hold and use them you get that in seconds.

Samsung's best tablet by miles is the Note, a phone with a stylus. It may look weird if you hold it to your face and make a call, but the other 95% of the time it just rocks. Apples decision to forget the precision stylus option was a mistake.

The obvious name for an 8" iPad would be "iPad mini."

(Yes, eight inches. 7.85" is much closer to 8" than to 7".)

IF... big IF a 7-inch iPad is released I think it will replace the iPod Touch in the line and be referred to as the iTouch. iPad will remain the large size only.

A mini-pad implies a maxi-pad, which could be confusing to the stock boys at Target. And that sort of confusion could lead to awkward moments on Christmas morning.

A cool name would be "Crunch Hardtack", "Biff Steel", "Dash Riprock", "Paul Drake" or "Race Bannon". But I doubt they will go for cool. So maybe iVerticallyChallenged, iHomunculus, or perhaps iMNotAKindle.

iPad mini.
iPad has more brand equity right now than iPod, and this device is going to be a lot more like the iPad than the iPod touch. Mini would be perfect because it's a smaller form factor of the same thing. Air would imply wedge shaped and a lot thinner whereas the iPad is all ready pretty thin. Nano would imply microscopic, and gives you the thought of a gadget that is smaller than either the iPhone or iPod, so something that is bigger than either if those things can't be a nano. A whole new idevice name would be too many idevice names for average customers to keep straight.
iPad mini.

If the iPad 3 = The New iPad with Retina Display then I would call it:

"The new smaller iPad with non-retina display"

Or just call it the iPad Air Nano Mini.

They will call it the "iPad mini" because it is cute, fits well within the product line and leaves rooms for the iPod touch that could be renamed the iPad nano.