U.K. courts order Apple to state Samsung didn't copy iPad

U.K. courts order Apple to state Samsung didn't copy iPad

The U.K. courts -- the same ones which purportedly ruled recently that Samsung's Galaxy Tab didn't copy the iPad because "it wasn't cool enough" -- have now ruled that Apple must publicly alert the British people of that judgement. Bloomberg reports:

As well as Apple’s website, the company must pay for notices in the Financial Times, the Daily Mail, Guardian Mobile magazine, and T3, according to a draft copy of the order provided by Samsung’s lawyers.

Apple, who doesn't even like to refer to competitors unless they're anthropomorphized in TV commercials, shown off as being equal attenuated on websites, or lacking tablet apps but not calcium content in keynotes, is already appealing the July 9 order.

If Apple succeeds on appeal, it will no doubt be onward and upward to the next round of patent litigation. If it fails, it will be interesting to see how Apple will comply with the order. Will it be the barest, blandest, legalese possible? Will it be as passive aggressive as possible? Or could they find a way to turn even an apology into a tactical advantage?

Apple and Samsung have been waging global thermonuclear patent war since Apple went on first-strike offensive in April 2011, saying:

Rather than innovate and develop its own technology and a unique Samsung style for its smart phone products and computer tablets, Samsung chose to copy Apple's technology, user interface and innovative style in these infringing products.

It's been up and down, back and forth since then. Complicating thing further, Apple remains Samsung's single largest manufacturing partner, with Samsung supplying key parts of the technology they're simultaneously accused of copying. Despite ongoing talks between Apple CEO Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Choi Gee-Sung, no resolution has been found, and court cases continue.

We discussed a lot of this in detail on the iMore show last night, including whether similar looking products make technology as a whole more accessible to mainstream users. (When's the last time you saw a refrigerator trade-dress suit?) I also poked more than a little fun at the situation on yesterday's iMore today...

If, ultimately, Apple has to apologize for calling Samsung a copyist on page 3 of some U.K. papers, well that's the price that sometimes has to be paid when playing high stakes patent poker.

Barring success in appeal, any suggestions for Apple on how they should apologize? Head on over to the comments on the YouTube video above and give us your funniest, wittiest, more creative Apple apology and you'll automagically be entered to win a $50 iTunes gift certificate -- because sometimes consumers deserve to be the ones that win.

Rene Ritchie

Editor-in-Chief of iMore, co-host of Iterate, Debug, Review, The TV Show, Vector, ZEN & TECH, and MacBreak Weekly podcasts. Cook, grappler, photon wrangler. Follow him on Twitter and Google+.

More Posts

 

1
loading...
0
loading...
21
loading...
0
loading...

← Previously

iMore store update: Now shipping iPhone and iPad accessories to more countries around the world for less than ever!

Next up →

Deal of the Day: 45% off Incipio Hive Honeycomb dermaSHOT Silicone Case for New iPad and iPad 2

Reader comments

U.K. courts order Apple to state Samsung didn't copy iPad

9 Comments
Sort by Rating

This is the "special" article that you were working on? If they are ordered to do so and fail in the series of wastefull appeals that always occur in the broken patent litigation system, then yes...they should.

This is so stupid. Why should apple have to advertise for Samsung? The judge must ba an apple hater. I just hope Sunday all these android OEMs will create something original and stop ripping of from apple.

Enjoying your pull down notification panel? Dear Apple, stop acting like your poo doesn't stink. For the life of me I can't figure out why they are trying to bite the hand that feeds them. (Samsung parts in your iOS device...)

Oh please.....this is the only sword you fandroids have these days. If it wasn't for Apple, you'd be sporting a BlackBerry wannabe. Yeah that's right. I said it. You first tried to rip off BB until Apple came along and presented a better device. Only then did google redesign android to accommodate touchscreens.