<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3G Blackberry Waiting on 3G iPhone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:31:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6330</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6330</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow Gruber to retort:</p>

<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>Why Market Share and Revenue Are Bull[$#!t]
John Gruber
Yesterday, 3:29 PM

Motorola’s quarterly results: 27.4 million phones sold and $7.45 billion in revenue. But the bottom line? A $194 million loss.

What matters is profit; market share and revenue only matter insofar as they lead to making money. Motorola sold 16 times more phones than Apple for at least 8 times more revenue — but is there a person on the planet who would trade Apple’s phone business for Motorola’s?

</td></tr></table>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcol</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator>marcol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6329</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;It could just be that they are not ready.  Unlike what many here seem to think, with only 0.6% of the market, the handheld world does not revolve around the iPhone.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For sure, but in terms of media coverage the iPhone punches way, way above its market share.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>It could just be that they are not ready.  Unlike what many here seem to think, with only 0.6% of the market, the handheld world does not revolve around the iPhone.</td></tr></table>

<p>For sure, but in terms of media coverage the iPhone punches way, way above its market share.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcol</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6328</link>
		<dc:creator>marcol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6328</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won&#039;t get any press other than &quot;oh, btw, rim has 3g too.&quot;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wait for iPhone hype to pass (ok this may be the weak bit of my argument :)) but also piggyback it was my point. Most likely it just isn&#039;t ready though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won't get any press other than "oh, btw, rim has 3g too."</td></tr></table>

<p>Wait for iPhone hype to pass (ok this may be the weak bit of my argument <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) but also piggyback it was my point. Most likely it just isn't ready though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You mean RIM wants to sell &quot;obsolete&quot; (TM Surur) smart phones even longer than Apple??!!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;LOL! Satiric genius again!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean RIM wants to sell "obsolete" (TM Surur) smart phones even longer than Apple??!!</p>

<p>LOL! Satiric genius again!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surur</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6326</link>
		<dc:creator>surur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6326</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt;marcol -

so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won&#039;t get any press other than &quot;oh, btw, rim has 3g too.&quot;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It could just be that they are not ready.  Unlike what many here seem to think, with only 0.6% of the market, the handheld world does not revolve around the iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Surur&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white>marcol -

so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won't get any press other than "oh, btw, rim has 3g too."</td></tr></table>

<p>It could just be that they are not ready.  Unlike what many here seem to think, with only 0.6% of the market, the handheld world does not revolve around the iPhone.</p>

<p>Surur</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmaier</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6325</link>
		<dc:creator>cmaier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6325</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;marcol -&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won&#039;t get any press other than &quot;oh, btw, rim has 3g too.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>marcol -</p>

<p>so why not introduce it FIRST, is the point.  once apple hype begins, rim won't get any press other than "oh, btw, rim has 3g too."</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcol</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6324</link>
		<dc:creator>marcol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 07:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6324</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The iPhone does seem to hog the limelight and you can see how coverage of RIM&#039;s new device could get lost in a tide of iPhone 3G/2.0 reporting. OTOH, if a decent proportion of those iPhone stories include some reference to an imminent new Blackberry that will compete, that could give it a fair bit of free publicity and build some buzz. Perhaps RIM have earned a little from Apple?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPhone does seem to hog the limelight and you can see how coverage of RIM's new device could get lost in a tide of iPhone 3G/2.0 reporting. OTOH, if a decent proportion of those iPhone stories include some reference to an imminent new Blackberry that will compete, that could give it a fair bit of free publicity and build some buzz. Perhaps RIM have earned a little from Apple?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmaier</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6323</link>
		<dc:creator>cmaier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6323</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Frighteningly I agree with Surur.  There is never an advantage to being second to market unless you are going to copy-and-surpass. If apple does something interesting and surprising with the 3G iphone, it would take RIM a year to copy it. (And I&#039;m pretty sure we all know what the 3G iphone will be at this point)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are far better off releasing first if they could.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frighteningly I agree with Surur.  There is never an advantage to being second to market unless you are going to copy-and-surpass. If apple does something interesting and surprising with the 3G iphone, it would take RIM a year to copy it. (And I'm pretty sure we all know what the 3G iphone will be at this point)</p>

<p>They are far better off releasing first if they could.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surur</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>surur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/04/25/3g-blackberry-waiting-on-3g-iphone/#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>&lt;table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td bgcolor=white&gt; And if there is some truth to this speculation, its another knock on RIM and the rest of the smartphone industry. Innovating has never been their strong suit, copying innovation, well that&#039;s another issue. 

Read more at &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/04/3g_blackberry_waiting_on_3g_ip.html&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/04/3g_blackberry_waiting_on_3g_ip.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How is waiting for Apple&#039;s dog and pony hype show to blow over &quot;lacking innovation&quot;? &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Are you actually implying RIM is waiting to copy Apple&#039;s 3G technology at the last minute?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width=100% bgcolor=lightgray><tr><td bgcolor=white> And if there is some truth to this speculation, its another knock on RIM and the rest of the smartphone industry. Innovating has never been their strong suit, copying innovation, well that's another issue. 

Read more at <a href=""http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/04/3g_blackberry_waiting_on_3g_ip.html"" target="_blank">http://www.phonedifferent.com/2008/04/3g_blackberry_waiting_on_3g_ip.html</a></td></tr></table>

<p>How is waiting for Apple's dog and pony hype show to blow over "lacking innovation"? </p>

<p>Are you actually implying RIM is waiting to copy Apple's 3G technology at the last minute?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

