<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bluetooth 3.0... in Time for iPhone 3.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Willie</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40497</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40497</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If I&#039;m not mistaken, this higher bandwidth will allow for higher quality sounding stereo bluetooth headphones. The fidelity in current sets are less than acceptable. We&#039;ll just have to see if this makes possible home stereo systems being able to utilize the HD audio streams and codecs via bluetooth, or maybe I&#039;m jumping way ahead of current technology?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I'm not mistaken, this higher bandwidth will allow for higher quality sounding stereo bluetooth headphones. The fidelity in current sets are less than acceptable. We'll just have to see if this makes possible home stereo systems being able to utilize the HD audio streams and codecs via bluetooth, or maybe I'm jumping way ahead of current technology?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edisontiger</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40437</link>
		<dc:creator>Edisontiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks rpv. I can&#039;t believe the difference. Thanks agian.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks rpv. I can't believe the difference. Thanks agian.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omari James</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40335</link>
		<dc:creator>Omari James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40335</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;WOW. Sounds like it will probably have something to do with BT Tethering. I doubt it has anything to do with sending files over BT since I haven&#039;t heard any news about Apple enabling that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. Sounds like it will probably have something to do with BT Tethering. I doubt it has anything to do with sending files over BT since I haven't heard any news about Apple enabling that.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpv</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40313</link>
		<dc:creator>rpv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40313</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No way, nobody will be able to implement this standard so quickly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Edisontiger: BT 2.0 is up to 2.1Mbit/s, BT 3.0 should be up to 480Mbit/s&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way, nobody will be able to implement this standard so quickly.</p>

<p>@Edisontiger: BT 2.0 is up to 2.1Mbit/s, BT 3.0 should be up to 480Mbit/s</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edisontiger</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40310</link>
		<dc:creator>Edisontiger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 00:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40310</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How much faster are they projecting the BT 3.0 is going to be compared to BT 2.0.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much faster are they projecting the BT 3.0 is going to be compared to BT 2.0.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muero</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/10/bluetooth-30-time-iphone-30/comment-page-1/#comment-40297</link>
		<dc:creator>Muero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=7989#comment-40297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Would a new Bluetooth version require new hardware chips, or can it work on older hardware, like the iPhone 3G?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a new Bluetooth version require new hardware chips, or can it work on older hardware, like the iPhone 3G?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

