<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 3.0: Voice Control to Get &quot;Jibbler&quot; With It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:58:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41921</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41921</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Voiceover like on the iPod shuffle would be awesome&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voiceover like on the iPod shuffle would be awesome</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41744</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41744</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Earless puppy:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not really a matter of being against positive forward steps for me... but rather a matter of priority. Lesser-needed features (anything entertainment related) preceding more important features (communications related) annoys me. But it&#039;s just my personal opinion that communication is more important than entertainment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Earless puppy:</p>

<p>It's not really a matter of being against positive forward steps for me... but rather a matter of priority. Lesser-needed features (anything entertainment related) preceding more important features (communications related) annoys me. But it's just my personal opinion that communication is more important than entertainment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icebike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41741</link>
		<dc:creator>icebike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41741</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Earless:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Integral to one is not needed to all,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which feature of the Iphone would that NOT apply to?
If that were the criteria for inclusion, the iPhone would be your basic candybar phone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Adam said &quot;integral to many&quot;, and with more states passing hands-free driving laws the definition of &quot;many&quot; is growing every year when it comes to bluetooth functionality.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Without bluetooth capability, voice control  still leaves you fiddling with the phone when you should be driving.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Earless:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Integral to one is not needed to all,</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Which feature of the Iphone would that NOT apply to?
If that were the criteria for inclusion, the iPhone would be your basic candybar phone.</p>

<p>Adam said "integral to many", and with more states passing hands-free driving laws the definition of "many" is growing every year when it comes to bluetooth functionality.</p>

<p>Without bluetooth capability, voice control  still leaves you fiddling with the phone when you should be driving.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earless puppy</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41736</link>
		<dc:creator>Earless puppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41736</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Integral to one is not needed to all, I am excited on the huge 3.0 improvements, with all the new upcoming features how can this not be viewed as a huge positive step foward?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Integral to one is not needed to all, I am excited on the huge 3.0 improvements, with all the new upcoming features how can this not be viewed as a huge positive step foward?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41726</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41726</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I hope they do implement this and that they allow avrcp to control it via Bluetooth!! If it can&#039;t be controlled over Bluetooth... That would be the usual apple let-down.. Always leaving one thing out which may be integral to many people.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do implement this and that they allow avrcp to control it via Bluetooth!! If it can't be controlled over Bluetooth... That would be the usual apple let-down.. Always leaving one thing out which may be integral to many people.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fassy</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41723</link>
		<dc:creator>fassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41723</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Icebike&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;vlingo is another free app, and I like how it works better than the Google app -- say &quot;find X&quot; to look for X on a map, &quot;search X&quot; to search google, and &quot;call X&quot; to dial, assuming of course X is in your contacts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Icebike</p>

<p>vlingo is another free app, and I like how it works better than the Google app -- say "find X" to look for X on a map, "search X" to search google, and "call X" to dial, assuming of course X is in your contacts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icebike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41719</link>
		<dc:creator>icebike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41719</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Fassy:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You have Map and search functions via voice already.
Install the free Google application.
Why does it have to be via &quot;vlingo&quot; (whateverthehell that is)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fassy:</p>

<p>You have Map and search functions via voice already.
Install the free Google application.
Why does it have to be via "vlingo" (whateverthehell that is)?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tunnelrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41714</link>
		<dc:creator>Tunnelrunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41714</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Voice dialing would be sweet...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voice dialing would be sweet...</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fassy</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41712</link>
		<dc:creator>fassy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41712</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Steve
Amen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though if they want to go beyond just voice dialing, I would much rather see the Maps and Search functions from vlingo as core services before any playlist controls...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve
Amen.</p>

<p>Though if they want to go beyond just voice dialing, I would much rather see the Maps and Search functions from vlingo as core services before any playlist controls...</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41711</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41711</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Please, for the love of all that&#039;s good and holy, let this feature be used through a BT headset.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, for the love of all that's good and holy, let this feature be used through a BT headset.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Reptile</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41710</link>
		<dc:creator>The Reptile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41710</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Playlist?  How about a voice activated apps launcher?  Voice activated Spotlight search too?  If the zen of Palm is the fewest number of clicks then wouldn&#039;t Apple need to do Palm one better by having no clicks?  That would teach the defectors a lesson.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playlist?  How about a voice activated apps launcher?  Voice activated Spotlight search too?  If the zen of Palm is the fewest number of clicks then wouldn't Apple need to do Palm one better by having no clicks?  That would teach the defectors a lesson.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/04/21/iphone-30-voice-control-jibbler/comment-page-1/#comment-41709</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8159#comment-41709</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Playlist, schmaylist... give me voice dialing already. :roll:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playlist, schmaylist... give me voice dialing already. <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

