<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wanted: Faster, More Powerful iPhone Processor Architect + Embedded Video Engineer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/</link>
	<description>More of everything iPhone and iPad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:03:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46443</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a bit off subject but I wanted to know if anyone could enlighten me on this.  Yesterday I was at the Sony store an saw a 12&quot; OLED screen for $2500.  Can someone tell me how Apple can feasibly include a 3.5&quot; OLED screen in a device that is going to cost $199 (I realize that includes a carrier subsidy)?  When you include all of the high-tech components in the iPhone 3G and add (without taking anything away) a compass, OLED screen, increased storage capacity, perhaps a better battery (yes, I type this assuming the iPhone spec rumors are true)...  How can a device with these specs remain at $199, I do not under stand this and in fact, I find it hard to believe that the new iPhone will include these screens.  I think they will stick with LCD for at least one more cycle.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit off subject but I wanted to know if anyone could enlighten me on this.  Yesterday I was at the Sony store an saw a 12&#8243; OLED screen for $2500.  Can someone tell me how Apple can feasibly include a 3.5&#8243; OLED screen in a device that is going to cost $199 (I realize that includes a carrier subsidy)?  When you include all of the high-tech components in the iPhone 3G and add (without taking anything away) a compass, OLED screen, increased storage capacity, perhaps a better battery (yes, I type this assuming the iPhone spec rumors are true)&#8230;  How can a device with these specs remain at $199, I do not under stand this and in fact, I find it hard to believe that the new iPhone will include these screens.  I think they will stick with LCD for at least one more cycle.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcdsim</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46432</link>
		<dc:creator>pcdsim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I smell 4G for next year, OH YES!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I smell 4G for next year, OH YES!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duodenum</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46430</link>
		<dc:creator>duodenum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John Carmack&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Carmack</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46422</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46422</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I just want less lag lmao..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want less lag lmao..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46412</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46412</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm.... if they have only just started looking for an NEON SIMD specialist then its unlikely that we&#039;ll see a Cortex-based iPhone in June or July. Sigh :(&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also highly doubt that Apple will be using a multi-core ARMv7 (Cortex-A9 MPCore) anytime soon. I reckon most applications made for the iPhone won&#039;t be able to effectively take advantage of multiple cores.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The single-core 600 MHz Cortex-A8 (like the OMAP3 used in the Palm Pre or the Pandora) is already 3x more powerful than the 400 MHz ARM11 CPU in the current iPhone. I think this is a good compromise between processing power and battery life. More general-purpose cores would make the chip larger, more expensive and power hungry.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;BTW, NEON is a SIMD extension to the ARM instructions set just like AltiVec is a SIMD extension to PowerPC instructions set and SSE is a SIMD extension to Intel x86 instructions set. Using NEON instructions should reduce the power required to decode audio and video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia has a lot of good information on ARM. Take a look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;. if they have only just started looking for an NEON SIMD specialist then its unlikely that we&#8217;ll see a Cortex-based iPhone in June or July. Sigh <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>I also highly doubt that Apple will be using a multi-core ARMv7 (Cortex-A9 MPCore) anytime soon. I reckon most applications made for the iPhone won&#8217;t be able to effectively take advantage of multiple cores.</p>

<p>The single-core 600 MHz Cortex-A8 (like the OMAP3 used in the Palm Pre or the Pandora) is already 3x more powerful than the 400 MHz ARM11 CPU in the current iPhone. I think this is a good compromise between processing power and battery life. More general-purpose cores would make the chip larger, more expensive and power hungry.</p>

<p>BTW, NEON is a SIMD extension to the ARM instructions set just like AltiVec is a SIMD extension to PowerPC instructions set and SSE is a SIMD extension to Intel x86 instructions set. Using NEON instructions should reduce the power required to decode audio and video.</p>

<p>Wikipedia has a lot of good information on ARM. Take a look:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARM_architecture</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46409</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46409</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Something smells very fishy!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something smells very fishy!!!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46408</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46408</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I guess that leaves &lt;em&gt;me&lt;/em&gt; out. :lol:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess that leaves <em>me</em> out. <img src='http://www.imore.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frog</title>
		<link>http://www.imore.com/2009/05/21/wanted-faster-powerful-iphone-processor-architect-embedded-video-engineer/comment-page-1/#comment-46406</link>
		<dc:creator>frog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theiphoneblog.com/?p=8677#comment-46406</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One hell of a team there building!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One hell of a team there building!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached

Served from: imore.com @ 2012-02-10 23:17:03 -->
